Pacemaker Therapy for Drug-refractory Symptoms in Mid-cavity Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Distal Ventricular Pacing and Intraventricular Gradient Reduction for Symptomatic Relief in Drug Refractory Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients With Mid-cavity Obstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main aim of this study is to assess the acute effects of a pacemaker on reducing abnormally high intracavity pressures in the hearts of patients with mid-cavity obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). During a 12-month period of double-blinded follow-up, descriptive data will be collected on patients symptomatic and physical performance during dichotomous pacemaker settings for 6-months each (active and back-up). The statistical information collected will be used to design a much larger research trial of patient benefit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2023
CompletedFebruary 1, 2023
February 1, 2023
4.9 years
January 17, 2018
January 31, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Invasive gradient (mmHg)
Acute invasively defined gradient change in mmHg across the mid-cavity with optimal ventricular pacing setting
Measured during pacemaker implant. Pressure gradients will be measured at different pacing sites during the implant.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Symptomatic assessment via SF36 questionnaire
Pre-implant, 4 months, and 8 months
Symptomatic assessment via Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaire
Pre-implant, 4 months, and 8 months
Symptomatic assessment via calculation of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
Pre-implant, 4 months, and 8 months
Exercise performance assessed by 6 minute walk test (6MWT)
Pre-implant, 4 months, and 8 months
Exercise performance assessed by Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) stress echocardiography.
Pre-implant, 4 months, and 8 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active pacing
EXPERIMENTALActive ventricular pacing. The pacemaker is set-up with a short atrio-ventricular delay to allow for appropriate pacing capture of the ventricle.
Back-up pacing
SHAM COMPARATORBack-up pacing. The pacemaker is set-up to sense and pace only in the right atrium (AAI) without any pacing capacity in the ventricle.
Interventions
Ventricular pacing via the invasive haemodynamic study-defined optimal pacing site in order to relieve pressure gradient across the mid-cavity obstruction in mid-cavity obstructive variant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Back-up pacing. The pacemaker is set-up to sense and pace only in the right atrium (AAI) without any pacing capacity in the ventricle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, \>18 years.
- Referred for PPM +/- ICD implantation for either primary prevention of sudden cardiac death or other indications such as heart block or obstructive physiology.
- HCM patients with evidence of mid-cavity gradient demonstrated by echocardiography and gradient ≥30 mmHg confirmed by cardiac catheterisation at rest or with isoprenaline provocation.
- All patients should be taking maximum tolerated doses of beta blockers or verapamil with or without disopyramide.
- Symptoms refractory to optimum medical therapy as above, for example breathlessness, chest pain, dizziness, or syncope.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with multi-level obstruction, i.e. across the mid-cavity and outflow tract.
- Patients with moderate or severe valvular stenosis or regurgitation.
- Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome.
- Patients unable to provide informed consent.
- Patients in atrial fibrillation.
- Pregnancy.
- Renal failure.
- If considered unsuitable by clinician.
- Patients already participating in trials involving invasive procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Barts Heart Centre
London, Thames, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Malcolmson JW, Hughes RK, Husselbury T, Khan K, Learoyd AE, Lees M, Wicks EC, Smith J, Simms AD, Moon JC, Lopes LR, O'Mahony C, Sekhri N, Elliott PM, Petersen SE, Dhinoja MB, Mohiddin SA. Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;17(7):e012570. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012570. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
PMID: 39012930DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Saidi A Mohiddin, BSc, MBChB, FRCP, MD
Barts Health NHS Trust and Queen Mary University of London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2018
First Posted
March 1, 2018
Study Start
February 9, 2018
Primary Completion
January 20, 2023
Study Completion
January 20, 2023
Last Updated
February 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02