Computed Tomography Perfusion Colorectal Cancer With Tumor Grade
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. The 5-years survival rate depends on the tumor stage and grade at patient presentation. Individual treatment strategy based on the tumor stage and grade should be applied to improve the prognosis, So the pre-operative diagnostic evaluation and grading of colorectal cancer are important.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2019
CompletedFebruary 28, 2018
February 1, 2018
1 year
February 22, 2018
February 22, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Blood flow of tumor
Accuracy of blood flow of the tumor in prediction of tumor grade in correlation with histopathological results
One month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Blood volume of the tumor
One month
Mean transient time of the tumor
One month
Permeability surface of the tumor
One month
Study Arms (1)
Patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma
The patients will undergo computed tomography perfusion
Interventions
Pre-contrast images will be obtained to identify the colorectal tumor location. Then Fifty milliliters of iopromide (Ultravist ) will be injected intra-venously at rate of 5 milliliter per second via an automatic pump injector for computed tomography perfusion scans. Computed tomography perfusion scans will be performed at the mid-portion of the tumor for 60seconds beginning 5 seconds after contrast injection. Then arterial input will be defined by using the mouse to place a circular region of interest and the tumor region of interest will be placed on the most enhanced area of the tumor. Tumor blood flow, blood volume, mean transient time \& permeability surface measurements will be obtained.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with colorectal mass pathologically proved to be adenocarcinoma by colonoscpoic biopsy
You may qualify if:
- Any patient with primary colorectal mass
You may not qualify if:
- Colorectal mass pathologically proved to be benign Female patient at child bearing period with suspected pregnancy Raised renal chemistry Hypersensitivity to contrast.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine
Asyut, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Sun H, Xu Y, Yang Q, Wang W. Assessment of tumor grade and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer: whole-volume perfusion CT. Acad Radiol. 2014 Jun;21(6):750-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.02.011.
PMID: 24809317BACKGROUNDKim JW, Jeong YY, Chang NK, Heo SH, Shin SS, Lee JH, Hur YH, Kang HK. Perfusion CT in colorectal cancer: comparison of perfusion parameters with tumor grade and microvessel density. Korean J Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-97. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.S1.S89. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
PMID: 22563293BACKGROUNDGoh V, Glynne-Jones R. Perfusion CT imaging of colorectal cancer. Br J Radiol. 2014 Feb;87(1034):20130811. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130811.
PMID: 24434157BACKGROUNDDighe S, Castellano E, Blake H, Jeyadevan N, Koh MU, Orten M, Swift I, Brown G. Perfusion CT to assess angiogenesis in colon cancer: technical limitations and practical challenges. Br J Radiol. 2012 Oct;85(1018):e814-25. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19855447. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
PMID: 22514101BACKGROUNDMarley AR, Nan H. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2016 Sep 30;7(3):105-114. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27766137BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter E Megala, MBBCh
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2018
First Posted
February 28, 2018
Study Start
March 10, 2018
Primary Completion
March 10, 2019
Study Completion
July 10, 2019
Last Updated
February 28, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share