Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improve the Absolute Walking Distance in Patients With Intermittent Claudication Compared to Best Available Treatment?
NESIC
A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Study: Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improve the Absolute Walking Distance in Patients With Intermittent Claudication (NESIC) Compared to Best Available Treatment?
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Intermittent claudication (IC) is caused by a blockage in the artery of the leg, causing muscle pain. Although some evidence of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the management of patients with IC exists, further high quality research is required. This proposed study is vital to identify the contribution of clinical change using NMES, compared to the current gold standard recommended practice of supervised exercise therapy (SET) and, actual standard of care offered in the majority of the UK and Ireland, including best medical therapy (BMT). The device is expected to increase the walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication (IC), and therefore have a benefit on the same when provided in addition to supervised exercise programmes. It is also expected to cause a reduction in pain symptoms and reduced likelihood of major intervention in late stage peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The principal research objective is to assess the clinical efficacy of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device as an adjunct to the local standard care that is available at the study randomisation sites, in order to improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication (IC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 10, 2024
CompletedApril 11, 2024
April 1, 2024
3.1 years
January 8, 2018
July 8, 2022
April 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in the Absolute Walking Distance (AWD) at 3 Months Between the Two Treatment Groups
Measured by treadmill testing. Absolute walking distance in meters at baseline and 3 months
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Difference in the Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) at 3 Months Between the Two Treatment Groups
3 months
Quality of Life - Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Quality of Life - EuroQoL 5D (EQ5D) Health Scale
Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months
Quality of Life Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary
Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months
Haemodynamic Assessment - Duplex Ultrasonography - Difference in Volume Flow Between Baseline and 3 Months
3 months
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Sub-group Analysis 1 - Difference in Absolute Walking Difference Between Baseline and 3 Months SET Sites vs Non-SET Sites
3 months
Sub-group Analysis 2 - Difference in Absolute Walking Difference Between Baseline and 3 Months (NMES+SET+BMT vs SET+BMT)
3 months
Sub-group Analysis 3 - Difference in Absolute Walking Difference Between Baseline and 3 Months (NMES+BMT vs BMT)
3 months
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThere will be no change to the local site standard of care for patients with IC attributed to participation in this trial. Those sites with Supervised Exercise Therapy (SET) will continue to provide this intervention as per their normal standard of care and locally agreed protocol.
Device
EXPERIMENTALLocal therapy + Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Capacity to provide informed consent
- Aged 18 or above
- Positive Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire
- ABPI \<0.9 OR positive stress test (fall in ankle pressure \>30mmHg, 40 secs post 1 min treadmill at 10% gradient, 4 km/h)
You may not qualify if:
- Severe IC requiring invasive intervention as determined by the treating clinician
- Critical limb Ischaemia as defined by the European Consensus Document
- Co-morbid disease prohibiting walking on a treadmill or taking part in supervised exercise therapy.
- Popliteal entrapment syndrome
- Commenced vascular symptom specific medication in previous 6 months e.g. naftidrofuryl oxalate, cilostazol
- Pregnancy
- Any implanted electronic, cardiac or defibrillator device
- Acute deep vein thrombosis
- Broken or bleeding skin including leg ulceration
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Recent lower limb injury or lower back pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
The Royal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Bournemouth, United Kingdom
North Bristol NHS Trust
Bristol, BS10 5NB, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Dorchester, United Kingdom
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hull, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Taunton, TA1 5DA, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
We did not stratify by baseline absolute walking distance AWD for the primary outcome analysis. Only 160 patients had analysable primary outcome data due to missing treadmill data. Absence of a sham device comparator.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Laura Burgess
- Organization
- Imperial College London
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Professor Davies
Chief Investigator
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2018
First Posted
February 26, 2018
Study Start
February 16, 2018
Primary Completion
March 31, 2021
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
April 11, 2024
Results First Posted
April 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share