NCT03443518

Brief Summary

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was introduced in 1990 for the first time as a minimally invasive procedure instead of the conventional open surgical repair, with the aim to decrease morbidity and mortality . Nowadays EVAR has become an acceptable management for patients with infra-renal aortic aneurysms (AAA) . A lot of anesthetic techniques have been used successfully for EVAR. EVAR requires sedative analgesic medications to achieve an acceptable level of comfort to the patient and cardiorespiratory stability. This is prospective randomized single blinded study of patients presenting with aorto-iliac aneurysm who will undergo EVAR. Patient's demographic data will be assessed, as well as clinical presentation, intraoperative complications. 30 patients undergoing elective EVAR will be included and will be divided equally into 2 groups. First group is the psoas compartment block (PCB) (15 patients): 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% will be infused over 3 minutes at the anatomical landmark. Second group is the LA and remifentanil group (LR) (15 patients): lidocaine 5 ml of 2% will be injected subcutaneous as local infiltration then remifentanil infusion with rate 0.03-0.1 μg kg-1 min-1. to achieve visual analog scale (VAS) 3 or less. Vital date will be recorded as baseline then every 5 minutes till the end of the procedure. VAS will be recorded as baseline then every 5 minutes till the end of the procedure. Also stress response which will be measured subjectively as vital data and VAS and objectively as cortisol level in the blood which will be measured as base line and immediate after the end of the procedure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 6, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 10, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

February 6, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 14, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

EVAR, analgesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The primary outcome was Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess perioperative analgesia and pain management. Pain was assessed using the 100-mm visual analog scale, ranging from 0 to 100. The lowest score is 0 (no pain/excellent analgesia) and the highest score is 100 (Max pain).

    Assessment to be done at baseline (immediate before starting the procedure), then every 10 min through study till 4 hours after given the anesthesia.The event was determent via asking patient about pain experience every time using 100 mm VAS

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Arterial blood pressure

    will be recorded at baseline (immediate before starting the procedure), then every 5 min through study till 4 hours after given the anesthesia.

  • Satisfactions Score

    Time frame include 2 time points, first time point: immediate at the end of the procedure and the second time point: 2 hours after the end of the procedure

  • heart rate (HR)

    Will be recorded at baseline (immediate before starting the procedure), then every 5 min through study till 4 hours after given the anesthesia.

  • Oxygen saturation

    Will be recorded at baseline (immediate before starting the procedure), then every 5 min through study till 4 hours after given the anesthesia.

Study Arms (2)

Psoas Compartment Block (PCB)

EXPERIMENTAL

30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% will be infused over 3 minutes at the anatomical land mark for psoas plexus, also normal saline 0.9% IV infusion will be in the same rate of the Remifentanil infusion for the other group.

Procedure: Psoas Compartment Block (PCB)Drug: Normal saline 0.9% IV infusion

L.A infiltration /Remifentanil infusion

EXPERIMENTAL

L.A infiltration (lidocaine) 5 ml of 2% will be injected subcutaneous as L.A infiltration then Remifentanil infusion with rate 0.03-0.1 μg / kg / min to achieve Visual Analog Scale 3 or less.

Procedure: Local Anesthesia infiltrationDrug: Remifentanil infusion

Interventions

30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% will be infused over 3 minutes at the anatomical landmark for Psoas Compartment Block (PCB)

Psoas Compartment Block (PCB)

Lidocaine 5 ml of 2% will be injected subcutaneous as local infiltration.

L.A infiltration /Remifentanil infusion

Normal saline 0.9% IV infusion at the same rate of the Remifentanil infusion(0.05-0.1 μg/ kg/min).

Psoas Compartment Block (PCB)

Remifentanil infusion with rate 0.03-0.1 μg/ kg/ min to achieve Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 3 or less

L.A infiltration /Remifentanil infusion

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All elective patients presenting with aortoiliac aneurysm who will undergo percutaneous EVAR.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

DR Erfan hospital

Jeddah, 0000, Saudi Arabia

Location

Erfan hospital

Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Interventions

Anesthesia, LocalSaline SolutionInfusions, Intravenous

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdministration, IntravenousDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeuticsInfusions, Parenteral

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Physicians giving intraoperative care and recording data were blind to group type. Meanwhile, the anesthesiologist caring for the patient was aware to group type
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesia consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2018

First Posted

February 23, 2018

Study Start

February 6, 2018

Primary Completion

November 10, 2018

Study Completion

December 10, 2018

Last Updated

February 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Locations