NCT03442946

Brief Summary

Malnutrition is common among critically ill patients, and has negative effects on clinical outcomes. Artificial nutrition therapy in the form of enteral or parenteral nutrition is therefore considered an integral part of standard care. While it has long been widely accepted that it is unethical to withhold nutrition therapy from those at risk of malnutrition, we and our collaborators provide first evidence that nutrition practices significantly influence clinically important outcomes such as length of stay, morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Among these, cardiac surgery patients are routinely exposed to significant systemic inflammation due to the need for a cardiopulmonary bypass, which triggers a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. As a consequence, the releases of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines lead to life-threatening complications in cardiac surgical patients. For such patients, aggressive life-sustaining therapies are needed while their organs recover. Besides, underfeeding is a major issue in this specific patient population. Often nutrition starts late and reaches only low nutrition adequacy. Recent data from our collaborators suggest that providing at least 80% of prescribed amounts of protein and energy is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Achieving this threshold of 80% of prescribed amounts of protein has been shown to be associated with reduced mortality in "at-risk" ICU patients and is more important than achieving energy goals. Despite these benefits, enteral or parenteral feeding should always be adopted with caution, as nutrition practices themselves are not per se without adverse effects or risks. Making decisions regarding the most effective and safe means of feeding patients in the ICU can be challenging, and consequently considerable variation exists in nutrition practices in this setting, whereas no guidelines yet exists specific of cardiac surgery patients. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are "systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances", and therefore aid in the implementation of evidence-based medicine. The Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Adult Patients published in 2003 by our close collaborator Prof Heyland and most recently updated in 2015, sought to improve nutrition practices in ICUs across Canada and worldwide by providing guidance to select and deliver the most appropriate form of nutrition therapy at the appropriate time via the most appropriate route. A validation study prior to the widespread dissemination of the Canadian Critical Care Nutrition CPGs concluded that adoption of the recommendations should lead to improved nutrition practices and potentially to better patient outcomes \[24\]. To change clinical practice, attention must extend beyond initial development to guideline implementation, dissemination and evaluation. Implementation strategies will vary by ICU, health care system and region and should be guided by local factors including the ICU's barriers and facilitators to following best practice. Evaluating and monitoring nutrition performance and focussing on different groups of critically ill patients, should be part of an on-going improvement strategy to improve nutrition care and clinical outcome. The few studies regarding the process of knowledge translation conducted in the ICU setting have demonstrated by our collaborators that guidelines and guideline implementation strategies improve the processes, outcomes, and the costs of caring for critically ill patients.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
280

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Geographic Reach
5 countries

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 15, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 22, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 26, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

February 15, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

nutrition guidelinescritical carecardiovascularnutrition therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in nutrition adequacy in the ICU

    Adequacy of nutrition (an indicator of overall performance) will be calculated as the amount of calories or protein received (from either enteral (EN) or appropriate parenteral nutrition (PN) but not oral) plus propofol, divided by the amount prescribed as per the baseline assessment and expressed as a percentage. Days without EN or PN will be included and counted as 0% adequacy. Days after permanent progression to exclusive oral intake will be excluded from the calculation of nutritional adequacy. We arbitrarily selected \>80% nutritional adequacy as an indicator of high performance.

    day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 5, day 6, day 7, day 8, day 9, day 10, day 11, day 12

Study Arms (1)

INS

Patients in need of a cardiovascular surgery will be included in this observational study. The focus is on the nutrition therapies provided to these critically ill patients according to institutional or international nutrition guidelines, what ever applies for the participating sites.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients in need of a cardiovascular surgery and meeting the inclusion criteria are considered to be eligible for this study.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients undergoing cardiac surgery
  • Mechanically ventilated within 48 hours of ICU admission
  • Stay on ICU \> 72 hours

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

University of Utah Medical Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States

Location

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Canada

Location

University hospital RWTH Aachen

Aachen, Germany

Location

Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center

Tehran, Iran

Location

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Novosibirsk, Russia

Location

Related Publications (30)

  • Giner M, Laviano A, Meguid MM, Gleason JR. In 1995 a correlation between malnutrition and poor outcome in critically ill patients still exists. Nutrition. 1996 Jan;12(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/0899-9007(95)00015-1.

  • Heyland DK. Nutritional support in the critically ill patients. A critical review of the evidence. Crit Care Clin. 1998 Jul;14(3):423-40. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70009-9.

  • Heyland DK, Novak F, Drover JW, Jain M, Su X, Suchner U. Should immunonutrition become routine in critically ill patients? A systematic review of the evidence. JAMA. 2001 Aug 22-29;286(8):944-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.8.944.

  • Heyland DK, Drover JW, Dhaliwal R, Greenwood J. Optimizing the benefits and minimizing the risks of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: role of small bowel feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002 Nov-Dec;26(6 Suppl):S51-5; discussion S56-7. doi: 10.1177/014860710202600608.

  • Novak F, Heyland DK, Avenell A, Drover JW, Su X. Glutamine supplementation in serious illness: a systematic review of the evidence. Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):2022-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00011.

  • Gramlich L, Kichian K, Pinilla J, Rodych NJ, Dhaliwal R, Heyland DK. Does enteral nutrition compared to parenteral nutrition result in better outcomes in critically ill adult patients? A systematic review of the literature. Nutrition. 2004 Oct;20(10):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.06.003.

  • Stoppe C, Meybohm P, Coburn M, Goetzenich A. [Cardioprotection in cardiac surgical patients : Everything good comes from the heart]. Anaesthesist. 2016 Mar;65(3):169-82. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0141-z. German.

  • Kim BS, Jacobs D, Emontzpohl C, Goetzenich A, Soppert J, Jarchow M, Schindler L, Averdunk L, Kraemer S, Marx G, Bernhagen J, Pallua N, Schlemmer HP, Simons D, Stoppe C. Myocardial Ischemia Induces SDF-1alpha Release in Cardiac Surgery Patients. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016 Jun;9(3):230-238. doi: 10.1007/s12265-016-9689-x. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

  • Dreymueller D, Goetzenich A, Emontzpohl C, Soppert J, Ludwig A, Stoppe C. The perioperative time course and clinical significance of the chemokine CXCL16 in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cell Mol Med. 2016 Jan;20(1):104-15. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12708. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

  • Stoppe C, McDonald B, Benstoem C, Elke G, Meybohm P, Whitlock R, Fremes S, Fowler R, Lamarche Y, Jiang X, Day AG, Heyland DK. Evaluation of Persistent Organ Dysfunction Plus Death As a Novel Composite Outcome in Cardiac Surgical Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jan;30(1):30-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.035. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

  • Drover JW, Cahill NE, Kutsogiannis J, Pagliarello G, Wischmeyer P, Wang M, Day AG, Heyland DK. Nutrition therapy for the critically ill surgical patient: we need to do better! JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):644-52. doi: 10.1177/0148607110372391.

  • Rahman A, Hasan RM, Agarwala R, Martin C, Day AG, Heyland DK. Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: Further validation of the "modified NUTRIC" nutritional risk assessment tool. Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;35(1):158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

  • Heyland DK, Cahill N, Day AG. Optimal amount of calories for critically ill patients: depends on how you slice the cake! Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2619-26. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318226641d.

  • Nicolo M, Heyland DK, Chittams J, Sammarco T, Compher C. Clinical Outcomes Related to Protein Delivery in a Critically Ill Population: A Multicenter, Multinational Observation Study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607115583675. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

  • Mentec H, Dupont H, Bocchetti M, Cani P, Ponche F, Bleichner G. Upper digestive intolerance during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: frequency, risk factors, and complications. Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1955-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00018.

  • Heyland DK, MacDonald S, Keefe L, Drover JW. Total parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1998 Dec 16;280(23):2013-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.23.2013.

  • Heyland DK, Schroter-Noppe D, Drover JW, Jain M, Keefe L, Dhaliwal R, Day A. Nutrition support in the critical care setting: current practice in canadian ICUs--opportunities for improvement? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Jan-Feb;27(1):74-83. doi: 10.1177/014860710302700174.

  • Mead P. Clinical guidelines: promoting clinical effectiveness or a professional minefield? J Adv Nurs. 2000 Jan;31(1):110-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01254.x.

  • Miller M, Kearney N. Guidelines for clinical practice: development, dissemination and implementation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Sep;41(7):813-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.09.005.

  • Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P; Canadian Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Sep-Oct;27(5):355-73. doi: 10.1177/0148607103027005355.

  • Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Day A, Jain M, Drover J. Validation of the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients: results of a prospective observational study. Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2260-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145581.54571.32.

  • Pilon CS, Leathley M, London R, McLean S, Phang PT, Priestley R, Rosenberg FM, Singer J, Anis AH, Dodek PM. Practice guideline for arterial blood gas measurement in the intensive care unit decreases numbers and increases appropriateness of tests. Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;25(8):1308-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00016.

  • Pitimana-aree S, Forrest D, Brown G, Anis A, Wang XH, Dodek P. Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for stress ulcer prophylaxis increases appropriateness and decreases cost of care. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Mar;24(3):217-23. doi: 10.1007/s001340050553.

  • Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Randall J, Allen CJ. Evaluation of a practice guideline for noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Chest. 2003 Jun;123(6):2062-73. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.6.2062.

  • Martin CM, Doig GS, Heyland DK, Morrison T, Sibbald WJ; Southwestern Ontario Critical Care Research Network. Multicentre, cluster-randomized clinical trial of algorithms for critical-care enteral and parenteral therapy (ACCEPT). CMAJ. 2004 Jan 20;170(2):197-204.

  • Burns SM, Earven S, Fisher C, Lewis R, Merrell P, Schubart JR, Truwit JD, Bleck TP; University of Virginia Long Term Mechanical Ventilation Team. Implementation of an institutional program to improve clinical and financial outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients: one-year outcomes and lessons learned. Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;31(12):2752-63. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000094217.07170.75.

  • Cahill NE, Dhaliwal R, Day AG, Jiang X, Heyland DK. Nutrition therapy in the critical care setting: what is "best achievable" practice? An international multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):395-401. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0263d.

  • Compher C, Chittams J, Sammarco T, Nicolo M, Heyland DK. Greater Protein and Energy Intake May Be Associated With Improved Mortality in Higher Risk Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter, Multinational Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):156-163. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002083.

  • Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Wang M, Day AG. The prevalence of iatrogenic underfeeding in the nutritionally 'at-risk' critically ill patient: Results of an international, multicenter, prospective study. Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug;34(4):659-66. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

  • Heyland DK, Heyland RD, Cahill NE, Dhaliwal R, Day AG, Jiang X, Morrison S, Davies AR. Creating a culture of clinical excellence in critical care nutrition: the 2008 "Best of the Best" award. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):707-15. doi: 10.1177/0148607110361901.

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PD Dr. med. Christian Stoppe

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2018

First Posted

February 22, 2018

Study Start

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion

December 31, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

May 26, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Locations