Silicone Adhesive Multilayer Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Ulcer
1 other identifier
interventional
1,634
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine if silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings applied to the sacrum, heels and greater trochanter in addition to standard prevention reduce pressure ulcer incidence category II, III, IV, Unstageable and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone, in at risk hospitalised patients. In particular, this trial extends previous trial results obtained in ICU setting. Therefore, only a maximum of 25% of patients will be recruited from ICU settings. The hypothesis is: 'The use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy for pressure ulcer prevention is more effective in reducing pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) incidence rate on sacrum, heels and greater trochanter, compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone.' The null hypothesis is: 'The use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy for pressure ulcer prevention is not more effective in reducing pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) incidence rate on sacrum, heels and greater trochanter, compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 26, 2021
CompletedApril 26, 2021
March 1, 2021
11 months
February 16, 2018
February 24, 2021
March 30, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanter
The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum, heels or greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). Patients in experimental groups 1 and 2 were pooled as the treatment group and compared to the control group (in the intention to treat population (n=1605) Note: The International NPUAP/EPUAP Pressure Ulcer Classification System (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2014)) distinguishes four categories of pressure ulcers: non-blanchable erythema of the intact skin (category I), partial thickness loss of dermis (category II), full thickness tissue loss (category III) and full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle (category IV). Also unstageable pressure ulcers and deep tissue injuries can be recognised. https://npiap.com/
assessment during 14 days
Other Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum
maximum treatment or study period 14 days
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Heel
maximum treatment or study period 14 days
The Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Trochanter
maximum treatment or study period 14 days
Study Arms (3)
Study Arm 1 (on top of standard of care)
EXPERIMENTALAllevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings * Patients at risk for pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) development will receive standard pressure ulcer prevention strategies (as described in the hospital protocol) which include ongoing risk assessment, regular repositioning and skin care. * Skin sites (restricted to sacrum, heel right/left and greater trochanter right/left) will be treated with silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings by Smith \& Nephew (Allevyn® brand).
Study Arm 2 (on top of standard of care)
EXPERIMENTALMepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings * Patients at risk for pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) development will receive standard pressure ulcer prevention strategies (as described in the hospital protocol) which include ongoing risk assessment, regular repositioning and skin care. * Skin sites (restricted to sacrum, heel right/left and greater trochanter right/left) will be treated with silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings by Mölnlycke Health care (Mepilex® brand).
Study Arm 3 (standard of care)
NO INTERVENTION* Patients at risk for pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) development will receive standard pressure ulcer prevention strategies (as described in the hospital protocol) which include ongoing risk assessment, regular repositioning and skin care. * No silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings will be applied on the skin sites of interest for this trial (sacrum, heel right/left, greater trochanter right/left).
Interventions
Skin sites (restricted to sacrum, heel right/left and greater trochanter right/left) will be treated with silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings by Smith\&Nephew (Allevyn® brand).
Skin sites (restricted to sacrum, heel right/left and greater trochanter right/left) will be treated with silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings by Mölnlycke Health care (Mepilex® brand).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At risk for pressure ulcer development based on Braden risk assessment (Braden score ≤17).
- Admitted to hospital within the previous 48 hours. Note: Not more than 25% of patients per site should be recruited at ICU wards.
- Skin at sacrum is assessable and there is no clinically relevant incontinence- associated dermatitis (IAD\*) or another skin condition that would be a contra-indication for the application of the devices under study, and there is no pressure ulcer category II or worse present.
- \*clinically relevant IAD is defined as any of the 4 categories described in the publication http://users.ugent.be/\~dibeeckm/globiadnl/nlv1.0.pdf
- For at least 3 of the following 4 skin sites (heel left, heel right, greater trochanter left, greater trochanter right) one of the following two conditions should apply:
- \- A study dressing can be applied as prevention of a pressure ulcer category II or worse at that skin site (there is no contra-indication)
- \- There is already a pressure ulcer category II or worse at that skin site.
- Written informed consent by the patient or his/her legal representative.
You may not qualify if:
- Aged \< 18 years.
- The length of stay counting from first day of admission in one or (if the patient is transferred to another ward) more participating wards is \< 7 days.
- Both heels amputated
- Previously known/documented allergy for substances used in the devices under study.
- A clinical condition not allowing participation in a clinical study.
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial.
- Patients who exceptionally receive or are planned to receive a dressing for the prevention of pressure ulcers at sacrum, heels and trochanters based on best medical judgment and outside of the surgery setting.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
OLV Aalst
Aalst, 9300, Belgium
AZ Maria Middelares Ghent
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
University of Ghent
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
UZ Brussel
Jette, 1090, Belgium
AZ Groeninge
Kortrijk, 8500, Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
OLV van Lourdes Ziekenhuis Waregem
Waregem, 8790, Belgium
AZ Sint-Elisabeth Zottegem
Zottegem, 9620, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Beeckman D, Fourie A, Raepsaet C, Van Damme N, Manderlier B, De Meyer D, Beele H, Smet S, Demarre L, Vossaert R, de Graaf A, Verhaeghe L, Vandergheynst N, Hendrickx B, Hanssens V, Keymeulen H, Vanderwee K, Van De Woestijne J, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Savoye I, Harrison J, Vrijens F, Hulstaert F. Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a pragmatic noncommercial multicentre randomized open-label parallel-group medical device trial. Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jul;185(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19689. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
PMID: 33216969RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Performance and detection bias may have occurred because patients, caregivers and study personnel could not be blinded to the study procedures/devices. All study nurses were trained, and for most hospitals wound care teams were involved when a PU occurred, further strengthening the correct identification of skin injuries.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jillian Harrison
- Organization
- Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Centre
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dimitri Beeckman
Ugent
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2018
First Posted
February 22, 2018
Study Start
February 8, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 26, 2021
Results First Posted
April 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- From 12 months after publication for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- To achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to trials@KCE.fgov.be. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Access will be granted to non-commercial researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for a relevant research questions. Relevance will be assessed by the Sponsor in collaboration with the Chief investigator.