Study Stopped
Difficulty to recruit patient.
Efficacy of Cryotherapy Combined or Not With Analgesics in Uncontrolled Painful Musculoskeletal Metastasis
CRYO
Randomized Controlled Multicenter Prospective Open-label Study of the Efficacy of the Percutaneous Cryotherapy Combined or Not With a Medical Analgesia in the Treatment of Patients With Uncontrolled Painful Musculoskeletal Metastasis
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy of 2 analgesic strategies, based on percutaneous cryotherapy plus medical supportive care versus medical supportive care alone in the treatment of cancer patients with painful musculoskeletal metastasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2020
CompletedOctober 19, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.9 years
January 29, 2018
October 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to analgesic strategy failure
Failure will be defined as at least, one of the following situations: Reescalation of the mean local pain by 2 points or more from the lowest pain score from baseline; Absence of pain relief ≥ 2 points 3 months after randomization; Indication of any other loco regional analgesic procedure (radiotherapy, interventional radiology or surgery).
Time from the date of randomization to the date of analgesic strategy failure assessed up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Percentage of pain relief
Weekly for the first 3 months, then monthly assessed up to 6 months
Depth of local pain relief
Numeric rating scale (scale range from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]): Weekly for the first 3 months, then monthly assessed up to 6 months
Depth of local pain relief
Brief Pail Inventory : Monthly assessment up to 6 months
The impact of local pain on the patient's quality of life
Monthly assessment up to 6 months
The impact of local pain on the patient's quality of life
Monthly assessment up to 6 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Date of last visit (Month 6 +/- 28 days)
Cost-utility analysis
Date of last visit (Month 6 +/- 28 days)
Budget impact analyses
One-year baseline period. Will be performed in case the experimental strategy dominates the standard strategy
Study Arms (2)
Cryotherapy + medical analgesics
EXPERIMENTALPercutaneous Cryotherapy and medical analgesics according to the investigator's discretion
Medical analgesics
ACTIVE COMPARATORMedical analgesics alone according to the investigator's discretion
Interventions
Percutaneous cryotherapy: A complete cycle of treatment will require 2 freezing 10-minutes periods, separate by a 9-minutes passive and 1-minute active thaw, with the cryoablation system. Dimension of the iceball coverage above the tumor will be monitored by non-contrast CT or MRI during the freezing cycle. Medical supportive care: Best analgesic therapy at investigator's discretion
Best analgesic therapy at investigator's discretion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years at the day of consenting to the study;
- Patient with at least 1 painful metastasis with a musculoskeletal involvement;
- Patient referred to a Pain Management Unit to optimize the analgesic strategy;
- Painful metastatic lesion that fulfils with all the following :
- Pain must be correlated with an identifiable lesion on imaging (Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography)
- Level of mean pain within the past 24 hours of at least 4/10 (numeric rating scale)
- Painful metastasis suitable for a procedure of percutaneous cryotherapy
- Life-expectancy longer than 6 months;
- Performance Status of the ECOG ≤2;
- Neutrophils count \> 1 Gi/l within the past 14 days;
- Adequate coagulation panel (as per the investigator judgement);
- Ability to understand and willingness for follow-up visits;
- Covered by a medical insurance;
- Signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient has been informed of all the pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrolment.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with a primary tumor of leukemia, lymphoma or myeloma;
- Tumor involving a weight bearing long bone of the lower limbs with the tumor causing more than 50% of cortical bone;
- Lesion amenable to any curative intervention;
- Formal indication for local analgesic procedure other than percutaneous cryotherapy;
- Prior radiotherapy on the targeted lesion within the 3 weeks prior to randomization;
- Patient with any contraindication for the procedure of percutaneous cryotherapy, including treatment requiring ice ball formation within 0.5 cm of the spinal cord, brain, other critical nerve, structure, large abdominal vessels such as the aorta or inferior vena cava, bowel or bladder (except if active or passive thermic protection can be performed);
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding disorders;
- Evidence of pregnancy, breast-feeding, or patient wishing to become pregnant during the study;
- Active, uncontrolled infection;
- Any cognitive impairment or any disease that may restrain the use of numeric scales and the administration of quality of life questionnaires;
- Clinically significant unrelated systemic illness (e.g., serious infection or significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or other organ dysfunction) that would likely interfere with study procedures or results;
- Concurrent participation in other experimental studies that could interfere with the primary endpoint assessment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69008, France
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13273, France
Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier-Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34298, France
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Centre René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
Institut Paul Strauss
Strasbourg, 67065, France
CHRU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091, France
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94805, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles MASTIER, MD
Centre Leon Berard
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2018
First Posted
February 22, 2018
Study Start
July 19, 2018
Primary Completion
May 30, 2020
Study Completion
August 30, 2020
Last Updated
October 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10