NCT03439787

Brief Summary

This study aims to assess the analgesic effect of the popliteal plexus block as a supplement to a femoral triangle block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 23, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 23, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 24, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAnesthetics, LocalPain, PostoperativeNerve BlockBupivacaineEpinephrine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success of the popliteal plexus block (PPB)

    Success of the PPB is defined as the proportion of patients with significant postoperative pain (NRS \> 3) after FTB, who drop in pain score to NRS ≤ 3 after PPB and maintain NRS ≤ 3 without any opioids until 60 minutes after PPB

    60 minutes after placement of the PPB

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Onset time of the PPB

    The pain scores after PPB are evaluated every 5 minutes until 15 minutes after PPB and hereafter every 15 minutes until 60 minutes after PPB

  • The effect of the PPB on cutaneous sensation

    Baseline and 2 hours after the placement of the PPB

  • The effect of PPB on isometric muscle strength of the he dorso- and plantar flexors of the ankle joint

    Baseline and 2 hours after the placement of the PPB

  • Opioid consumption from 0-4 hours

    Subjects receiving PPB: From after PPB placement and up until 4 hours after PPB. Subjects not receiving PPB: From the end of the primary observation period (POP) and up until 4 hours after the end of the POP

  • Opioid consumption from 4-24 hours

    Subjects receiving PPB: From 4 hours after PPB placement and up until 24 hours after PPB. Subjects not receiving PPB: From 4 hours after the end of the POP and up until 24 hours after the end of the POP

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active Popliteal Plexus Block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

10 ml Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.5%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution

Drug: Bupivacaine-EPINEPHrine 0.5%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution

Placebo Popliteal Plexus Block

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

10 ml Sodium Chloride 0.9 %

Other: Sodium Chloride 0.9 %

Interventions

10 ml

Also known as: Marcain-adrenaline
Active Popliteal Plexus Block

10 ml

Placebo Popliteal Plexus Block

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female at least 50 years of age at screening
  • Scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty in spinal anesthesia
  • Normal sensory function at the lateral part of the thigh and lower leg
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1, 2, or 3
  • Able to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to cooperate and follow the study protocol
  • Communication problems
  • Allergic towards any medical product administered in the study
  • Diabetes requiring medical treatment
  • Preoperative opioid treatment (dosed \> once daily)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Silkeborg Regional Hospital

Silkeborg, 8600, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. The Optimal Analgesic Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):711-719. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000485.

    PMID: 27685346BACKGROUND
  • Wong WY, Bjorn S, Strid JM, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Defining the Location of the Adductor Canal Using Ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):241-245. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000539.

    PMID: 28002228BACKGROUND
  • GARDNER E. The innervation of the knee joint. Anat Rec. 1948 May;101(1):109-30. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091010111. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18915634BACKGROUND
  • Abdallah FW, Chan VW, Gandhi R, Koshkin A, Abbas S, Brull R. The analgesic effects of proximal, distal, or no sciatic nerve block on posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2014 Dec;121(6):1302-10. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000406.

    PMID: 25099748BACKGROUND
  • Abdallah FW, Madjdpour C, Brull R. Is sciatic nerve block advantageous when combined with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty? a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2016 May;63(5):552-68. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0613-2. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

    PMID: 26896282BACKGROUND
  • Runge C, Borglum J, Jensen JM, Kobborg T, Pedersen A, Sandberg J, Mikkelsen LR, Vase M, Bendtsen TF. The Analgesic Effect of Obturator Nerve Block Added to a Femoral Triangle Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):445-51. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000406.

    PMID: 27171822BACKGROUND
  • McNamee DA, Parks L, Milligan KR. Post-operative analgesia following total knee replacement: an evaluation of the addition of an obturator nerve block to combined femoral and sciatic nerve block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Jan;46(1):95-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460117.x.

    PMID: 11903080BACKGROUND
  • Taha AM. Brief reports: ultrasound-guided obturator nerve block: a proximal interfascial technique. Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):236-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318237fb40. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

    PMID: 22025494BACKGROUND
  • Goffin P, Lecoq JP, Ninane V, Brichant JF, Sala-Blanch X, Gautier PE, Bonnet P, Carlier A, Hadzic A. Interfascial Spread of Injectate After Adductor Canal Injection in Fresh Human Cadavers. Anesth Analg. 2016 Aug;123(2):501-3. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001441.

    PMID: 27442773BACKGROUND
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

    PMID: 18929686BACKGROUND
  • Runge C, Moriggl B, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. The Spread of Ultrasound-Guided Injectate From the Adductor Canal to the Genicular Branch of the Posterior Obturator Nerve and the Popliteal Plexus: A Cadaveric Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):725-730. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000675.

    PMID: 28937534BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Sodium Chloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Study Officials

  • Charlotte R Sørensen, MD

    Silkeborg Regional Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2018

First Posted

February 20, 2018

Study Start

May 15, 2018

Primary Completion

August 23, 2018

Study Completion

August 23, 2018

Last Updated

April 25, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-08

Locations