Study Stopped
Methodological problems/problems in the study design (competing pain and a placebo effect). No serious adverse events or other safety issues
Popliteal Plexus Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
The Effect of the Popliteal Plexus Block on Postoperative Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the analgesic effect of the popliteal plexus block as a supplement to a femoral triangle block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started May 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 23, 2018
CompletedApril 25, 2019
August 1, 2018
3 months
January 18, 2018
April 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success of the popliteal plexus block (PPB)
Success of the PPB is defined as the proportion of patients with significant postoperative pain (NRS \> 3) after FTB, who drop in pain score to NRS ≤ 3 after PPB and maintain NRS ≤ 3 without any opioids until 60 minutes after PPB
60 minutes after placement of the PPB
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Onset time of the PPB
The pain scores after PPB are evaluated every 5 minutes until 15 minutes after PPB and hereafter every 15 minutes until 60 minutes after PPB
The effect of the PPB on cutaneous sensation
Baseline and 2 hours after the placement of the PPB
The effect of PPB on isometric muscle strength of the he dorso- and plantar flexors of the ankle joint
Baseline and 2 hours after the placement of the PPB
Opioid consumption from 0-4 hours
Subjects receiving PPB: From after PPB placement and up until 4 hours after PPB. Subjects not receiving PPB: From the end of the primary observation period (POP) and up until 4 hours after the end of the POP
Opioid consumption from 4-24 hours
Subjects receiving PPB: From 4 hours after PPB placement and up until 24 hours after PPB. Subjects not receiving PPB: From 4 hours after the end of the POP and up until 24 hours after the end of the POP
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active Popliteal Plexus Block
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 ml Bupivacaine-Epinephrine 0.5%-1:200,000 Injectable Solution
Placebo Popliteal Plexus Block
PLACEBO COMPARATOR10 ml Sodium Chloride 0.9 %
Interventions
10 ml
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female at least 50 years of age at screening
- Scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty in spinal anesthesia
- Normal sensory function at the lateral part of the thigh and lower leg
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1, 2, or 3
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to cooperate and follow the study protocol
- Communication problems
- Allergic towards any medical product administered in the study
- Diabetes requiring medical treatment
- Preoperative opioid treatment (dosed \> once daily)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Silkeborg Regional Hospital
Silkeborg, 8600, Denmark
Related Publications (11)
Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. The Optimal Analgesic Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):711-719. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000485.
PMID: 27685346BACKGROUNDWong WY, Bjorn S, Strid JM, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Defining the Location of the Adductor Canal Using Ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):241-245. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000539.
PMID: 28002228BACKGROUNDGARDNER E. The innervation of the knee joint. Anat Rec. 1948 May;101(1):109-30. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091010111. No abstract available.
PMID: 18915634BACKGROUNDAbdallah FW, Chan VW, Gandhi R, Koshkin A, Abbas S, Brull R. The analgesic effects of proximal, distal, or no sciatic nerve block on posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2014 Dec;121(6):1302-10. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000406.
PMID: 25099748BACKGROUNDAbdallah FW, Madjdpour C, Brull R. Is sciatic nerve block advantageous when combined with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty? a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2016 May;63(5):552-68. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0613-2. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
PMID: 26896282BACKGROUNDRunge C, Borglum J, Jensen JM, Kobborg T, Pedersen A, Sandberg J, Mikkelsen LR, Vase M, Bendtsen TF. The Analgesic Effect of Obturator Nerve Block Added to a Femoral Triangle Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):445-51. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000406.
PMID: 27171822BACKGROUNDMcNamee DA, Parks L, Milligan KR. Post-operative analgesia following total knee replacement: an evaluation of the addition of an obturator nerve block to combined femoral and sciatic nerve block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Jan;46(1):95-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460117.x.
PMID: 11903080BACKGROUNDTaha AM. Brief reports: ultrasound-guided obturator nerve block: a proximal interfascial technique. Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):236-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318237fb40. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
PMID: 22025494BACKGROUNDGoffin P, Lecoq JP, Ninane V, Brichant JF, Sala-Blanch X, Gautier PE, Bonnet P, Carlier A, Hadzic A. Interfascial Spread of Injectate After Adductor Canal Injection in Fresh Human Cadavers. Anesth Analg. 2016 Aug;123(2):501-3. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001441.
PMID: 27442773BACKGROUNDHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18929686BACKGROUNDRunge C, Moriggl B, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. The Spread of Ultrasound-Guided Injectate From the Adductor Canal to the Genicular Branch of the Posterior Obturator Nerve and the Popliteal Plexus: A Cadaveric Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):725-730. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000675.
PMID: 28937534BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charlotte R Sørensen, MD
Silkeborg Regional Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2018
First Posted
February 20, 2018
Study Start
May 15, 2018
Primary Completion
August 23, 2018
Study Completion
August 23, 2018
Last Updated
April 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-08