Comparison of Two Different Virtual Reality Methods in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Comparison of the Effects of Two Different Virtual Reality Treatment Methods in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
51
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
As a chronic, autoimmune, inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neurologic problem which the most frequent cause of disability in young adults. Fatigue, pain, spasticity, muscle weakness, depression, as well as balance and gait disorders are amongst the symptoms of MS. Balance disorders and the falls caused by them are the most frequent problems which result in disability of MS patients, with 75% of all patients being affected during the course of disease. When considering previous studies carried out on physiotherapy and rehabilitation practices in the light of balance disorders and other related problems faced by MS patients, it can been that various physiotherapeutic approaches are applied with varying follow-up times and in the form of hospital sessions, home sessions, or group training. Posture and balance problems in MS patients are tried to be solved through long-lasting treatment sessions using traditional methods of physiotherapy, where less patient participation is observed. Fatigue, psychological impairment, and insufficient motivation are other aspects which influence the success of treatment and which need to be addressed in MS patients. In contrast to traditional methods of physiotherapy applied in form of long-lasting treatment sessions, technology-supported rehabilitation approaches have emerged in recent years. It can be seen that different systems have started to be employed in the physiotherapy of many chronic diseases, either alone or in company with traditional methods. Even though the clinical use of these systems is becoming widespread, there are certain gaps in terms of the systems' impacts, comparative advantages, or cost effectiveness. Keeping this in mind, the purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the impacts of 'Nintendo Wii Fit' and 'Balance Trainer', as two of the technologic methods with therapeutic impact which have started to be used for different diagnosis groups in recent years, on the balance and posture parameters of MS patients, with the ultimate aim to introduce a whole new point of view to traditional physiotherapy and rehabilitation studies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis
Started Jul 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2018
CompletedFebruary 19, 2018
February 1, 2018
1 year
December 11, 2017
February 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Berg Balance Scale
The Berg Balance Scale is a 56-point scale designed to measure balance among older people by the assessment of functional tasks. Its concurrent validity has been established for people with multiple sclerosis. The Berg Balance Scale is a five point ordinal scale and consisting of 14 balance activity. Each activity is scored between 0-4 and higher total scores indicating less impaired balance. 45-56=independent, 21-44=assisted walking, 0-20=dependent.
Change between baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention were assessed.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Timed Up and Go Test
Change between baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention were assessed.
Six Minutes Walk Test
Change between baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention were assessed.
Fatigue Severity Scale
Change between baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention were assessed.
Study Arms (3)
Nintendo Wii Fit
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the Nintendo Wii group were included to exercise program that consisted of 16 individual PT-supervised sessions (two 60-minute sessions/week), which were prepared to improve balance. Each session started with 10 minutes of non-resistance cycling work for warm-up.
Balance Trainer
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the Balance Trainer group were included to exercise program that consisted of 16 individual PT-supervised sessions (two 60-minute sessions/week), which were prepared to improve balance. Each session started with 10 minutes of non-resistance cycling work for warm-up.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in the 'Group III-control group' were included in the waiting list until the end of the study.
Interventions
Nintendo Wii Fit' training protocol consisted of 'Penguin Slide', 'Table Tilt', 'Ski Slalom', 'Heading' and 'Balance Bubble' games that selected from the Wii Fit Plus balance games section
Balance Trainer' training protocol consisted of 'Collect Apples', 'Outline', 'Paddle War' and 'Evaluation of Movement' games which were included in the device software and allowed the patients to done balance exercises in different directions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants who were ambulatory and volunteer to participate to the study, in a stable phase of the disease, without relapses or worsening in the last 3 months, with an EDSS between 2.5-6 and aged between 25 to 60 years
You may not qualify if:
- physical activity more than 150 minutes per week, were pregnant, had blurred vision, had psychiatric problems, or severe cognitive impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Biruni Universitylead
- Istanbul Universitycollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2017
First Posted
February 19, 2018
Study Start
July 15, 2016
Primary Completion
July 15, 2017
Study Completion
July 15, 2017
Last Updated
February 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share