Development and Validation of the Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale in Patients With Periodontal Problems

NCT03436537 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 17-KAEK-131
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 100
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Aesthetics for individuals become increasingly important, while the aesthetic effects of periodontal disease is an important issue that should be assessed by the patient's perception. The results demonstrate that the periodontal aesthetic perception scale showed reliable and valid scores in healthy controls and periodontal patients. The periodontal aesthetic perception scale may be an appropriate tool to assess periodontal esthetic in clinical and research settings.

Conditions

Gingival Enlargement; Gingival Recession

Keywords

aesthetic; development; periodontal; reliability; validity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Validity of PAPS

  The KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) test produced a value of 0.80, which was greater than the recommended threshold value of 0.50.

  6 months

Study Arms (3)

Gingival recession (GR) group

GR group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale

Other: Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale

Gingival enlargement (GE) group

GE group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale.

Other: Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale

periodontal healthy (H) group

H group answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale.

Other: Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale

Interventions

Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale OTHER

Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale

Gingival enlargement (GE) group; Gingival recession (GR) group; periodontal healthy (H) group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who fulfilled the criteria for inclusion presenting at the periodontology clinic were asked to participate in the study and those agreeing to interview were asked how and what aesthetically disturbing symptoms in their gingiva.

You may qualify if:

• \- The presence of gingival recession (Miller Class I, II, III, or IV) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.
• The presence of gingival enlargement (Grade 0, I, II, III, or IV) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.

You may not qualify if:

• The presence of prosthesis, tooth loss or caries in the anterior teeth
• The precence of the psychological or systemic disease

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Gaziosmanpasa University

Tokat Province, 60250, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994 Mar;11(1):3-11.

  PMID: 8193981 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival Hyperplasia; Gingival Recession

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival Overgrowth; Gingival Diseases; Periodontal Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases; Periodontal Atrophy

Study Officials

• Ozge Gokturk

  Study Principal Investigator

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CONTROL
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: asst. assoc.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 12, 2018
• First Posted: February 19, 2018
• Study Start: January 2, 2017
• Primary Completion: July 1, 2017
• Study Completion: December 1, 2017
• Last Updated: February 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02

Locations

TU (1)