NCT03435770

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new ablation catheter developed by MEDICAL TAEWOONG for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasm (pancreatic adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumour). The ablation is performed using EUSRA needle and radio frequency waves under ultrasound imaging. The subject who will be recruited into this study are patients who are deemed as non-surgical candidates.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2018

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

February 10, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

EUS-guided RFAEndoscopic ultrasoundradio frequency ablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • To measure the technical success of EUS-guided RFA

    It is defined as successful puncture of the pancreatic lesion with the RFA needle and completion of the ablation cycle.

    18 months

  • To measure side effects and adverse event of EUS-guided RFA

    Adverse events specific to RFA would be graded according to the lexicon of endoscopic adverse events (PB Cotton GIE 2010). Potential adverse events specific to RFA include: * Post-RFA syndrome: Combination of flu like symptoms including fever, malaise, pain at the site of ablation, nausea, and/or vomiting and that no other septic source is identified. * Pancreatitis: Clinical presence of abdominal pain with an increase in amylase level \>3 times above the normal serum amylase levels. * Pancreatic leak: The presence of an abdominal collection with an amylase level that is \>3 times normal serum amylase levels. * Thermal injury: Coagulative necrosis occurring at the site of needle entry within the gastrointestinal tract with or without clinical sequelae.

    18 months

Study Arms (1)

EUSRA RFA needle

EXPERIMENTAL

This procedure is very similar to the standard technique of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration. All patients would undergo EUS with a linear array or therapeutic echoendoscope. The location and size of the lesion would be assessed for suitability of treatment. After locating the lesion, the EUSRA RFA needle would be inserted to the centre of the lesion. RFA would then be initiated and hyperechoic interferences would be observed around the electrode signifying heating of the tissue.

Device: EUSRA RFA needle

Interventions

A 19-gauge RFA electrode and a RF generator with a electrode that is needle-shaped and echogenic that allows EUS guided puncture of the target lesion. The active electrode tip is 1 cm in length. During ablation, the RF electrode is cooled and perfused internally with circulating chilled saline solution (0°C) delivered via a pump to maintain a constant temperature. A setting of 50W energy would be used for RFA and the duration of application is 10 seconds. Sequential applications of up to 7 times per session are allowed for complete ablation of the lesions.

EUSRA RFA needle

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 21 years-old or above
  • Suffering from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour or pancreatic ductal carcinoma that was confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology
  • Unsuitable for surgery, due to one (or more) of the following items:
  • ASA score \>/= III
  • An alternative advanced malignancy
  • Unsuitable for surgery upon expert's opinion for any other reason
  • Individuals who are not keen for surgical resection
  • Eligible for endoscopic intervention
  • Written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1.5, partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control), platelet count \<50,000x103/uL
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with a poor mental condition or mental retardation, unable to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study
  • Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
  • Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, 169856, Singapore

Location

Related Publications (25)

  • Rossi S, Fornari F, Pathies C, Buscarini L. Thermal lesions induced by 480 KHz localized current field in guinea pig and pig liver. Tumori. 1990 Feb 28;76(1):54-7. doi: 10.1177/030089169007600114.

    PMID: 2181746BACKGROUND
  • McGahan JP, Browning PD, Brock JM, Tesluk H. Hepatic ablation using radiofrequency electrocautery. Invest Radiol. 1990 Mar;25(3):267-70. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199003000-00011. No abstract available.

    PMID: 2185179BACKGROUND
  • Bai H, Huangz X, Jing L, Zeng Q, Han L. The effect of radiofrequency ablation vs. liver resection on survival outcome of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Mar-Apr;62(138):373-7.

    PMID: 25916066BACKGROUND
  • Qi X, Tang Y, An D, Bai M, Shi X, Wang J, Han G, Fan D. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 May-Jun;48(5):450-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000008.

    PMID: 24172183BACKGROUND
  • De Filippo M, Bozzetti F, Martora R, Zagaria R, Ferretti S, Macarini L, Brunese L, Rotondo A, Rossi C. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of renal tumors. Radiol Med. 2014 Jul;119(7):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0412-1. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

    PMID: 25024061BACKGROUND
  • Smith SL, Jennings PE. Lung radiofrequency and microwave ablation: a review of indications, techniques and post-procedural imaging appearances. Br J Radiol. 2015 Feb;88(1046):20140598. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140598. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

    PMID: 25465192BACKGROUND
  • Liu SY, Ng EK, Lee PS, Wong SK, Chiu PW, Mui WL, So WY, Chow FC. Radiofrequency ablation for benign aldosterone-producing adenoma: a scarless technique to an old disease. Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):1058-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318f66936.

    PMID: 21107117BACKGROUND
  • Keane MG, Bramis K, Pereira SP, Fusai GK. Systematic review of novel ablative methods in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 7;20(9):2267-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2267.

    PMID: 24605026BACKGROUND
  • Kim HJ, Seo DW, Hassanuddin A, Kim SH, Chae HJ, Jang JW, Park DH, Lee SS, Lee SK, Kim MH. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of the porcine pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Nov;76(5):1039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.015.

    PMID: 23078928BACKGROUND
  • Song TJ, Seo DW, Lakhtakia S, Reddy N, Oh DW, Park DH, Lee SS, Lee SK, Kim MH. Initial experience of EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):440-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.048. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

    PMID: 26344883BACKGROUND
  • Chu KF, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014 Mar;14(3):199-208. doi: 10.1038/nrc3672.

    PMID: 24561446BACKGROUND
  • Goldberg SN, Mallery S, Gazelle GS, Brugge WR. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation in the pancreas: results in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Sep;50(3):392-401. doi: 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98847.

    PMID: 10462663BACKGROUND
  • Varadarajulu S, Jhala NC, Drelichman ER. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation with a prototype electrode array system in an animal model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Aug;70(2):372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

    PMID: 19560138BACKGROUND
  • Carrara S, Arcidiacono PG, Albarello L, Addis A, Enderle MD, Boemo C, Campagnol M, Ambrosi A, Doglioni C, Testoni PA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided application of a new hybrid cryotherm probe in porcine pancreas: a preliminary study. Endoscopy. 2008 Apr;40(4):321-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995595.

    PMID: 18389449BACKGROUND
  • Carrara S, Arcidiacono PG, Albarello L, Addis A, Enderle MD, Boemo C, Neugebauer A, Campagnol M, Doglioni C, Testoni PA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided application of a new internally gas-cooled radiofrequency ablation probe in the liver and spleen of an animal model: a preliminary study. Endoscopy. 2008 Sep;40(9):759-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077520. Epub 2008 Aug 13.

    PMID: 18702032BACKGROUND
  • Matsui Y, Nakagawa A, Kamiyama Y, Yamamoto K, Kubo N, Nakase Y. Selective thermocoagulation of unresectable pancreatic cancers by using radiofrequency capacitive heating. Pancreas. 2000 Jan;20(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200001000-00002.

    PMID: 10630378BACKGROUND
  • Elias D, Baton O, Sideris L, Lasser P, Pocard M. Necrotizing pancreatitis after radiofrequency destruction of pancreatic tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Feb;30(1):85-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.10.013.

    PMID: 14736529BACKGROUND
  • Hadjicostas P, Malakounides N, Varianos C, Kitiris E, Lerni F, Symeonides P. Radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(1):61-4. doi: 10.1080/13651820500466673.

    PMID: 18333241BACKGROUND
  • Wu Y, Tang Z, Fang H, Gao S, Chen J, Wang Y, Yan H. High operative risk of cool-tip radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pancreatic head cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;94(5):392-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.20580.

    PMID: 16967436BACKGROUND
  • Spiliotis JD, Datsis AC, Michalopoulos NV, Kekelos SP, Vaxevanidou A, Rogdakis AG, Christopoulou AN. Radiofrequency ablation combined with palliative surgery may prolong survival of patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Jan;392(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0098-5. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

    PMID: 17089173BACKGROUND
  • Girelli R, Frigerio I, Salvia R, Barbi E, Tinazzi Martini P, Bassi C. Feasibility and safety of radiofrequency ablation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2010 Feb;97(2):220-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6800.

    PMID: 20069610BACKGROUND
  • Arcidiacono PG, Carrara S, Reni M, Petrone MC, Cappio S, Balzano G, Boemo C, Cereda S, Nicoletti R, Enderle MD, Neugebauer A, von Renteln D, Eickhoff A, Testoni PA. Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided cryothermal ablation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Dec;76(6):1142-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

    PMID: 23021160BACKGROUND
  • 1. Pai M, Yang J, Zhang X, Jin Z, Wang D, Senturk H, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN, Kahaleh M, Habib N, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2013;62(Suppl 1):A153.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pai M, Senturk H, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN, Cicinnati C, Kabar I, Beckebaum S, Jin Z, Wang D, Yang J, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) for Cystic Neoplasms and Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(5S): AB143-AB144

    BACKGROUND
  • Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20189503BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic NeoplasmsAdenoma, Islet Cell

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesAdenomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic Type

Study Officials

  • Yung Ka Chin, MBChB

    Department of Gastroenterology & Herpetology, Singapore General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: prospective, open label
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2018

First Posted

February 19, 2018

Study Start

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion

September 1, 2019

Study Completion

September 1, 2019

Last Updated

February 20, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD on study protocol will be made available

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
12months after completion
Access Criteria
Information will be made available after requestors sign a data assess agreement.

Locations