Evaluation of Safety and Feasibility of EUS-guided RFA for Solid Pancreatic Neoplasms
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new ablation catheter developed by MEDICAL TAEWOONG for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasm (pancreatic adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumour). The ablation is performed using EUSRA needle and radio frequency waves under ultrasound imaging. The subject who will be recruited into this study are patients who are deemed as non-surgical candidates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 20, 2018
February 1, 2018
1.5 years
February 10, 2018
February 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To measure the technical success of EUS-guided RFA
It is defined as successful puncture of the pancreatic lesion with the RFA needle and completion of the ablation cycle.
18 months
To measure side effects and adverse event of EUS-guided RFA
Adverse events specific to RFA would be graded according to the lexicon of endoscopic adverse events (PB Cotton GIE 2010). Potential adverse events specific to RFA include: * Post-RFA syndrome: Combination of flu like symptoms including fever, malaise, pain at the site of ablation, nausea, and/or vomiting and that no other septic source is identified. * Pancreatitis: Clinical presence of abdominal pain with an increase in amylase level \>3 times above the normal serum amylase levels. * Pancreatic leak: The presence of an abdominal collection with an amylase level that is \>3 times normal serum amylase levels. * Thermal injury: Coagulative necrosis occurring at the site of needle entry within the gastrointestinal tract with or without clinical sequelae.
18 months
Study Arms (1)
EUSRA RFA needle
EXPERIMENTALThis procedure is very similar to the standard technique of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration. All patients would undergo EUS with a linear array or therapeutic echoendoscope. The location and size of the lesion would be assessed for suitability of treatment. After locating the lesion, the EUSRA RFA needle would be inserted to the centre of the lesion. RFA would then be initiated and hyperechoic interferences would be observed around the electrode signifying heating of the tissue.
Interventions
A 19-gauge RFA electrode and a RF generator with a electrode that is needle-shaped and echogenic that allows EUS guided puncture of the target lesion. The active electrode tip is 1 cm in length. During ablation, the RF electrode is cooled and perfused internally with circulating chilled saline solution (0°C) delivered via a pump to maintain a constant temperature. A setting of 50W energy would be used for RFA and the duration of application is 10 seconds. Sequential applications of up to 7 times per session are allowed for complete ablation of the lesions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 21 years-old or above
- Suffering from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour or pancreatic ductal carcinoma that was confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology
- Unsuitable for surgery, due to one (or more) of the following items:
- ASA score \>/= III
- An alternative advanced malignancy
- Unsuitable for surgery upon expert's opinion for any other reason
- Individuals who are not keen for surgical resection
- Eligible for endoscopic intervention
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1.5, partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control), platelet count \<50,000x103/uL
- Pregnancy
- Patients with a poor mental condition or mental retardation, unable to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study
- Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
- Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169856, Singapore
Related Publications (25)
Rossi S, Fornari F, Pathies C, Buscarini L. Thermal lesions induced by 480 KHz localized current field in guinea pig and pig liver. Tumori. 1990 Feb 28;76(1):54-7. doi: 10.1177/030089169007600114.
PMID: 2181746BACKGROUNDMcGahan JP, Browning PD, Brock JM, Tesluk H. Hepatic ablation using radiofrequency electrocautery. Invest Radiol. 1990 Mar;25(3):267-70. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199003000-00011. No abstract available.
PMID: 2185179BACKGROUNDBai H, Huangz X, Jing L, Zeng Q, Han L. The effect of radiofrequency ablation vs. liver resection on survival outcome of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Mar-Apr;62(138):373-7.
PMID: 25916066BACKGROUNDQi X, Tang Y, An D, Bai M, Shi X, Wang J, Han G, Fan D. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 May-Jun;48(5):450-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000008.
PMID: 24172183BACKGROUNDDe Filippo M, Bozzetti F, Martora R, Zagaria R, Ferretti S, Macarini L, Brunese L, Rotondo A, Rossi C. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of renal tumors. Radiol Med. 2014 Jul;119(7):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0412-1. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
PMID: 25024061BACKGROUNDSmith SL, Jennings PE. Lung radiofrequency and microwave ablation: a review of indications, techniques and post-procedural imaging appearances. Br J Radiol. 2015 Feb;88(1046):20140598. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140598. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
PMID: 25465192BACKGROUNDLiu SY, Ng EK, Lee PS, Wong SK, Chiu PW, Mui WL, So WY, Chow FC. Radiofrequency ablation for benign aldosterone-producing adenoma: a scarless technique to an old disease. Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):1058-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318f66936.
PMID: 21107117BACKGROUNDKeane MG, Bramis K, Pereira SP, Fusai GK. Systematic review of novel ablative methods in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 7;20(9):2267-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2267.
PMID: 24605026BACKGROUNDKim HJ, Seo DW, Hassanuddin A, Kim SH, Chae HJ, Jang JW, Park DH, Lee SS, Lee SK, Kim MH. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of the porcine pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Nov;76(5):1039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.015.
PMID: 23078928BACKGROUNDSong TJ, Seo DW, Lakhtakia S, Reddy N, Oh DW, Park DH, Lee SS, Lee SK, Kim MH. Initial experience of EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):440-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.048. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
PMID: 26344883BACKGROUNDChu KF, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014 Mar;14(3):199-208. doi: 10.1038/nrc3672.
PMID: 24561446BACKGROUNDGoldberg SN, Mallery S, Gazelle GS, Brugge WR. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation in the pancreas: results in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Sep;50(3):392-401. doi: 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98847.
PMID: 10462663BACKGROUNDVaradarajulu S, Jhala NC, Drelichman ER. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation with a prototype electrode array system in an animal model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Aug;70(2):372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
PMID: 19560138BACKGROUNDCarrara S, Arcidiacono PG, Albarello L, Addis A, Enderle MD, Boemo C, Campagnol M, Ambrosi A, Doglioni C, Testoni PA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided application of a new hybrid cryotherm probe in porcine pancreas: a preliminary study. Endoscopy. 2008 Apr;40(4):321-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995595.
PMID: 18389449BACKGROUNDCarrara S, Arcidiacono PG, Albarello L, Addis A, Enderle MD, Boemo C, Neugebauer A, Campagnol M, Doglioni C, Testoni PA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided application of a new internally gas-cooled radiofrequency ablation probe in the liver and spleen of an animal model: a preliminary study. Endoscopy. 2008 Sep;40(9):759-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077520. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
PMID: 18702032BACKGROUNDMatsui Y, Nakagawa A, Kamiyama Y, Yamamoto K, Kubo N, Nakase Y. Selective thermocoagulation of unresectable pancreatic cancers by using radiofrequency capacitive heating. Pancreas. 2000 Jan;20(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200001000-00002.
PMID: 10630378BACKGROUNDElias D, Baton O, Sideris L, Lasser P, Pocard M. Necrotizing pancreatitis after radiofrequency destruction of pancreatic tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Feb;30(1):85-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.10.013.
PMID: 14736529BACKGROUNDHadjicostas P, Malakounides N, Varianos C, Kitiris E, Lerni F, Symeonides P. Radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(1):61-4. doi: 10.1080/13651820500466673.
PMID: 18333241BACKGROUNDWu Y, Tang Z, Fang H, Gao S, Chen J, Wang Y, Yan H. High operative risk of cool-tip radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pancreatic head cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;94(5):392-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.20580.
PMID: 16967436BACKGROUNDSpiliotis JD, Datsis AC, Michalopoulos NV, Kekelos SP, Vaxevanidou A, Rogdakis AG, Christopoulou AN. Radiofrequency ablation combined with palliative surgery may prolong survival of patients with advanced cancer of the pancreas. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Jan;392(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0098-5. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
PMID: 17089173BACKGROUNDGirelli R, Frigerio I, Salvia R, Barbi E, Tinazzi Martini P, Bassi C. Feasibility and safety of radiofrequency ablation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2010 Feb;97(2):220-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6800.
PMID: 20069610BACKGROUNDArcidiacono PG, Carrara S, Reni M, Petrone MC, Cappio S, Balzano G, Boemo C, Cereda S, Nicoletti R, Enderle MD, Neugebauer A, von Renteln D, Eickhoff A, Testoni PA. Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided cryothermal ablation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Dec;76(6):1142-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
PMID: 23021160BACKGROUND1. Pai M, Yang J, Zhang X, Jin Z, Wang D, Senturk H, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN, Kahaleh M, Habib N, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2013;62(Suppl 1):A153.
BACKGROUNDPai M, Senturk H, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN, Cicinnati C, Kabar I, Beckebaum S, Jin Z, Wang D, Yang J, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) for Cystic Neoplasms and Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(5S): AB143-AB144
BACKGROUNDCotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available.
PMID: 20189503BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yung Ka Chin, MBChB
Department of Gastroenterology & Herpetology, Singapore General Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2018
First Posted
February 19, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion
September 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 12months after completion
- Access Criteria
- Information will be made available after requestors sign a data assess agreement.
IPD on study protocol will be made available