NCT03434652

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of auricular neurostimulation via an non-invasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulator in children and adults with cyclic vomiting syndrome.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
47

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 31, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2018

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2018

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 3, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 3, 2021

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 13, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

February 1, 2018

Results QC Date

November 8, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting & Retching (INVR)

    Acute therapy arm: Daily nausea and vomiting severity assessed by validated scale 0-32 (0=no symptoms; 32=worse possible nausea/vomiting) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater nausea/vomiting). Daily scores for baseline (day 1) and end of therapy (day 7) were compared for both active and sham groups. Chronic therapy arm: Daily nausea and vomiting severity assessed by validated scale 0-32 (0=no symptoms; 32=worse possible nausea/vomiting) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater nausea/vomiting). Daily scores were averaged for each week of the 6 weeks of therapy and compared between a baseline assessment and week 6 of therapy.

    Acute arm: at the start of the first and second illness cycle through next 7 days for each illness cycle (active and sham therapy). Chronic arm: from date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) through 6 weeks of therapy.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Numeric Pain Scale

    From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) through next 7 days for each cycle of therapy with day 7 reported as end of therapy.

  • Anxiety

    From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) to end of therapy. For Chronic therapy arm, end of therapy= 6 weeks. For Acute therapy arm, end of therapy = day 7 (on site).

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems- Health-Related Quality of Life

    From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) to end of therapy and at 3 months follow-up. For Chronic therapy arm, end of therapy = 6 weeks. For Acute therapy arm, end of therapy = day 7.

  • Functional Disability Inventory- Disability in Children

    From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) to end of therapy and 3 months follow-up. For Chronic therapy arm, end of therapy = 6 weeks. For Acute therapy arm, end of therapy = 7 days.

  • Disability in Adults

    Anticipated assessment from date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) and end of therapy for each cycle of therapy as well as follow-up visit after end of therapy. However, no adult participants were enrolled.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Acute therapy: active vs sham percutaneous neurostimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

Subject randomized to 5 days of active or sham neurostimulation therapy during the first illness cycle. With the second illness cycle, each subject will then cross over to the other therapy (active or sham).

Device: Percutaneous neurostimulation

Chronic therapy: active (open-label) percutaneous neurostimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Each subject receives 6 consecutive weeks of active (open-label) neurostimulation therapy.

Device: Percutaneous neurostimulation

Interventions

Auricular percutaneous neurostimulation

Also known as: Neuro-Stim System (NSS)-2 BRIDGE
Acute therapy: active vs sham percutaneous neurostimulationChronic therapy: active (open-label) percutaneous neurostimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Meeting Rome IV Pediatric or Adult criteria for Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome (CVS)
  • Concurrent abdominal pain with CVS cycle
  • English-speaking
  • Lack of other explanation for symptoms
  • Either predictable, 'calendar-timed' episodes or prodromal symptoms for 12-24 hours that are predictive of episodes onset

You may not qualify if:

  • Medically complex and/or suffering from medical condition that may explain symptoms
  • Taking a medication that may explain symptoms
  • Significant developmental delays
  • Patients treated with a new drug affecting the central nervous system within one week of enrollment
  • Infection or severe dermatological condition of ear
  • Stable vital signs
  • No currently implanted electrical device
  • For adults (and adolescents as applicable): pregnancy, severe cardiopulmonary disease, concurrent chronic marijuana use (\>2 times/month over past 6 months prior to enrollment)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kovacic K, Hainsworth K, Sood M, Chelimsky G, Unteutsch R, Nugent M, Simpson P, Miranda A. Neurostimulation for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescents: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;2(10):727-737. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30253-4. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

    PMID: 28826627BACKGROUND
  • Babygirija R, Sood M, Kannampalli P, Sengupta JN, Miranda A. Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation modulates central pain pathways and attenuates post-inflammatory visceral and somatic hyperalgesia in rats. Neuroscience. 2017 Jul 25;356:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 17.

    PMID: 28526575BACKGROUND
  • Miranda A, Taca A. Neuromodulation with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation is associated with reduction in signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal: a multisite, retrospective assessment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2018;44(1):56-63. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2017.1295459. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

    PMID: 28301217BACKGROUND
  • Roberts A, Sithole A, Sedghi M, Walker CA, Quinn TM. Minimal adverse effects profile following implantation of periauricular percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulators: a retrospective cohort study. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Nov 3;9:389-393. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S107426. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27843360BACKGROUND
  • Karrento K, Zhang L, Conley W, Qazi Z, Venkatesan T, Simpson P, Li BUK. Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation improves comorbidities in children with cyclic vomiting syndrome. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 14;4:1203541. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1203541. eCollection 2023.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Familial cyclic vomiting syndromeMigraine Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Headache Disorders, PrimaryHeadache DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Katherine Siegel, Research Manager, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology
Organization
Medical College of Wisconsin

Study Officials

  • Katja Kovacic, MD

    Medical College of Wisconsin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double blind, cross over study for Arm 1 (Acute treatment) only Arm 2: open-label
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Arm 1 (Acute treatment): Each subject randomized to active vs sham therapy during 1st illness cycle after enrollment, then cross over to the other (active vs sham) during the 2nd illness cycle. Arm 2 (Chronic treatment): Active, chronic (prophylactic) therapy (open label) x 6 consecutive weeks of intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2018

First Posted

February 15, 2018

Study Start

January 31, 2018

Primary Completion

March 3, 2021

Study Completion

March 3, 2021

Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Results First Posted

February 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations