Auricular Neurostimulation for Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
Efficacy of Auricular Neurostimulation for Children and Adults With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy of auricular neurostimulation via an non-invasive percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulator in children and adults with cyclic vomiting syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 3, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2026
CompletedFebruary 13, 2026
January 1, 2026
3.1 years
February 1, 2018
November 8, 2022
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting & Retching (INVR)
Acute therapy arm: Daily nausea and vomiting severity assessed by validated scale 0-32 (0=no symptoms; 32=worse possible nausea/vomiting) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater nausea/vomiting). Daily scores for baseline (day 1) and end of therapy (day 7) were compared for both active and sham groups. Chronic therapy arm: Daily nausea and vomiting severity assessed by validated scale 0-32 (0=no symptoms; 32=worse possible nausea/vomiting) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater nausea/vomiting). Daily scores were averaged for each week of the 6 weeks of therapy and compared between a baseline assessment and week 6 of therapy.
Acute arm: at the start of the first and second illness cycle through next 7 days for each illness cycle (active and sham therapy). Chronic arm: from date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) through 6 weeks of therapy.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Numeric Pain Scale
From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) through next 7 days for each cycle of therapy with day 7 reported as end of therapy.
Anxiety
From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) to end of therapy. For Chronic therapy arm, end of therapy= 6 weeks. For Acute therapy arm, end of therapy = day 7 (on site).
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems- Health-Related Quality of Life
From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) to end of therapy and at 3 months follow-up. For Chronic therapy arm, end of therapy = 6 weeks. For Acute therapy arm, end of therapy = day 7.
Functional Disability Inventory- Disability in Children
From date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) to end of therapy and 3 months follow-up. For Chronic therapy arm, end of therapy = 6 weeks. For Acute therapy arm, end of therapy = 7 days.
Disability in Adults
Anticipated assessment from date of baseline assessment (therapy start date) and end of therapy for each cycle of therapy as well as follow-up visit after end of therapy. However, no adult participants were enrolled.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Acute therapy: active vs sham percutaneous neurostimulation
SHAM COMPARATORSubject randomized to 5 days of active or sham neurostimulation therapy during the first illness cycle. With the second illness cycle, each subject will then cross over to the other therapy (active or sham).
Chronic therapy: active (open-label) percutaneous neurostimulation
EXPERIMENTALEach subject receives 6 consecutive weeks of active (open-label) neurostimulation therapy.
Interventions
Auricular percutaneous neurostimulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Meeting Rome IV Pediatric or Adult criteria for Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome (CVS)
- Concurrent abdominal pain with CVS cycle
- English-speaking
- Lack of other explanation for symptoms
- Either predictable, 'calendar-timed' episodes or prodromal symptoms for 12-24 hours that are predictive of episodes onset
You may not qualify if:
- Medically complex and/or suffering from medical condition that may explain symptoms
- Taking a medication that may explain symptoms
- Significant developmental delays
- Patients treated with a new drug affecting the central nervous system within one week of enrollment
- Infection or severe dermatological condition of ear
- Stable vital signs
- No currently implanted electrical device
- For adults (and adolescents as applicable): pregnancy, severe cardiopulmonary disease, concurrent chronic marijuana use (\>2 times/month over past 6 months prior to enrollment)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (5)
Kovacic K, Hainsworth K, Sood M, Chelimsky G, Unteutsch R, Nugent M, Simpson P, Miranda A. Neurostimulation for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescents: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;2(10):727-737. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30253-4. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
PMID: 28826627BACKGROUNDBabygirija R, Sood M, Kannampalli P, Sengupta JN, Miranda A. Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation modulates central pain pathways and attenuates post-inflammatory visceral and somatic hyperalgesia in rats. Neuroscience. 2017 Jul 25;356:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 17.
PMID: 28526575BACKGROUNDMiranda A, Taca A. Neuromodulation with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation is associated with reduction in signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal: a multisite, retrospective assessment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2018;44(1):56-63. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2017.1295459. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28301217BACKGROUNDRoberts A, Sithole A, Sedghi M, Walker CA, Quinn TM. Minimal adverse effects profile following implantation of periauricular percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulators: a retrospective cohort study. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Nov 3;9:389-393. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S107426. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27843360BACKGROUNDKarrento K, Zhang L, Conley W, Qazi Z, Venkatesan T, Simpson P, Li BUK. Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation improves comorbidities in children with cyclic vomiting syndrome. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 14;4:1203541. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1203541. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37389229DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Katherine Siegel, Research Manager, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Organization
- Medical College of Wisconsin
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katja Kovacic, MD
Medical College of Wisconsin
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double blind, cross over study for Arm 1 (Acute treatment) only Arm 2: open-label
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2018
First Posted
February 15, 2018
Study Start
January 31, 2018
Primary Completion
March 3, 2021
Study Completion
March 3, 2021
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Results First Posted
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share