Comparing Different Methods for Collection of Comorbidity Data Per the HCT-CI
2 other identifiers
observational
360
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comorbidity assessment in the field of HCT might be a burden on the medical team at the clinic or the research staff. This research study aims to explore and validate new methods, Claims-based and patient questionnaire-based, as alternatives to the standard chart-based method in order to facilitate comorbidity coding. The study aims to save time and effort of medical personnel and to ensure the inclusion of comorbidity information in all clinical trials and outcome research studies in order to improve the accuracy of treatment decision-making, patient assignment to appropriate HCT strategy and hence HCT outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2013
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 22, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2018
CompletedMay 31, 2023
May 1, 2018
3.2 years
February 9, 2018
May 30, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the rate of agreement on HCT-CI scores between 3 measures
3 measures: the questionnaire-based and the claims-based methods versus the chart-based method.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Assess the accuracy of predicting HCT outcomes and resource utilization (e.g., hospitalization) between the three methods of scoring
2 years
Eligibility Criteria
Patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies who are being treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
You may qualify if:
- Patients eligible for autologous or allogeneic HCT.
- Able to speak and read English.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent.
- There is no restriction based on diagnosis, intensity of conditioning regimen, type of donor graft, degree of HLA-matching, or stem cell source.
- Patients \>20 years old
- Access to a telephone for study-related communications.
You may not qualify if:
- HCT candidates who cannot read, write, or speak English.
- Patients \<20 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Related Publications (20)
Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storer B, Sandmaier BM, Diaconescu R, Flowers C, Maloney DG, Storb R. Comparing morbidity and mortality of HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative and myeloablative conditioning: influence of pretransplantation comorbidities. Blood. 2004 Aug 15;104(4):961-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0545. Epub 2004 Apr 27.
PMID: 15113759BACKGROUNDDiaconescu R, Flowers CR, Storer B, Sorror ML, Maris MB, Maloney DG, Sandmaier BM, Storb R. Morbidity and mortality with nonmyeloablative compared with myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-matched related donors. Blood. 2004 Sep 1;104(5):1550-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0804. Epub 2004 May 18.
PMID: 15150081BACKGROUNDPiccirillo JF, Vlahiotis A, Barrett LB, Flood KL, Spitznagel EL, Steyerberg EW. The changing prevalence of comorbidity across the age spectrum. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Aug;67(2):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
PMID: 18375141BACKGROUNDGloeckler Ries LA, Reichman ME, Lewis DR, Hankey BF, Edwards BK. Cancer survival and incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Oncologist. 2003;8(6):541-52. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-6-541.
PMID: 14657533BACKGROUNDMcClune BL, Weisdorf DJ, Pedersen TL, Tunes da Silva G, Tallman MS, Sierra J, Dipersio J, Keating A, Gale RP, George B, Gupta V, Hahn T, Isola L, Jagasia M, Lazarus H, Marks D, Maziarz R, Waller EK, Bredeson C, Giralt S. Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1878-87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4821. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
PMID: 20212255BACKGROUNDvan Spronsen DJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Lemmens VE, Peters WG, Coebergh JW. Independent prognostic effect of co-morbidity in lymphoma patients: results of the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Eur J Cancer. 2005 May;41(7):1051-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.01.010.
PMID: 15862755BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PMID: 3558716BACKGROUNDDi Iorio B, Cillo N, Cirillo M, De Santo NG. Charlson Comorbidity Index is a predictor of outcomes in incident hemodialysis patients and correlates with phase angle and hospitalization. Int J Artif Organs. 2004 Apr;27(4):330-6. doi: 10.1177/039139880402700409.
PMID: 15163067BACKGROUNDGoldstein LB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Horner RD. Charlson Index comorbidity adjustment for ischemic stroke outcome studies. Stroke. 2004 Aug;35(8):1941-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000135225.80898.1c. Epub 2004 Jul 1.
PMID: 15232123BACKGROUNDHemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Quan H, Ghali WA. Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jul;42(1):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00415-3.
PMID: 12830464BACKGROUNDSachdev M, Sun JL, Tsiatis AA, Nelson CL, Mark DB, Jollis JG. The prognostic importance of comorbidity for mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 18;43(4):576-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.031.
PMID: 14975466BACKGROUNDLubke T, Monig SP, Schneider PM, Holscher AH, Bollschweiler E. [Does Charlson-comorbidity index correlate with short-term outcome in patients with gastric cancer?]. Zentralbl Chir. 2003 Nov;128(11):970-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44805. German.
PMID: 14669119BACKGROUNDFirat S, Byhardt RW, Gore E. Comorbidity and Karnofksy performance score are independent prognostic factors in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: an institutional analysis of patients treated on four RTOG studies. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Oct 1;54(2):357-64. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02939-5.
PMID: 12243808BACKGROUNDSabin SL, Rosenfeld RM, Sundaram K, Har-el G, Lucente FE. The impact of comorbidity and age on survival with laryngeal cancer. Ear Nose Throat J. 1999 Aug;78(8):578, 581-4.
PMID: 10485151BACKGROUNDSingh B, Bhaya M, Stern J, Roland JT, Zimbler M, Rosenfeld RM, Har-El G, Lucente FE. Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with head and neck cancer: a multi-institutional study. Laryngoscope. 1997 Nov;107(11 Pt 1):1469-75. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199711000-00009.
PMID: 9369392BACKGROUNDExtermann M. Measuring comorbidity in older cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2000 Mar;36(4):453-71. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00319-6.
PMID: 10717521BACKGROUNDKatz JN, Chang LC, Sangha O, Fossel AH, Bates DW. Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review? Med Care. 1996 Jan;34(1):73-84. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199601000-00006.
PMID: 8551813BACKGROUNDCorser W, Sikorskii A, Olomu A, Stommel M, Proden C, Holmes-Rovner M. "Concordance between comorbidity data from patient self-report interviews and medical record documentation". BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr 16;8:85. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-85.
PMID: 18416841BACKGROUNDSorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, Storer B. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005 Oct 15;106(8):2912-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004. Epub 2005 Jun 30.
PMID: 15994282BACKGROUNDBacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V, Apperley J, Slavin S, Pasquini M, Sandmaier BM, Barrett J, Blaise D, Lowski R, Horowitz M. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Dec;15(12):1628-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
PMID: 19896087BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Sorror, MD
Associate Member, Fred Hutch
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2018
First Posted
February 15, 2018
Study Start
March 22, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share