NCT03433716

Brief Summary

Lateral epicondylitis (LE), also known as tennis elbow, refers to a painful condition at or around the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and common extensor tendon (CET) that is aggravated by dorsiflexion and/or supination of the wrist against resistance. Lateral epicondylitis is one of the most common injuries of the elbow, affecting 1-3% of the population. Therefore, determining an effective intervention that helps manage the condition and lessens the financial burden is important. Passive physical modalities, including electrotherapy and orthotic devices, are common treatments for the management of elbow pain. Passive physical modalities are physical treatments involving a device that does not require active participation by the patient. In a systematic review, 2017, Dion et al examined the effectiveness of passive physical modalities for the treatment of soft tissue injuries of the elbow, but little evidence exists to support or refute their use. Clinically, an invasive technique has appeared, known as Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation (PNM). This minimally invasive intervention consists in the applicacion of a percutaneous electrical stimulation (PES) through an acupuncture needle-like electrode that is placed in close proximity to the nerve or motor point of the muscle with ultrasound guidance. At the clinical level, the PES is always used with the therapeutic aim of relieving chronic pain and neuropathic pain. Similarly, in sports, PES is used with the aim of improving muscular activity. Therefore, according to the characteristics and the therapeutic benefits of this technique, further research is needed to discover multiple clinical indications. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the effects of a percutaneous neuromodulation intervention in patients with unilateral refractory lateral epicondylitis. Findings from this study may provide further evidence for the relevance of neural tissues in determining the elbow pain and may indicate effects of US-guided NMP technique on the rehabilitation and/or prevention of in patients with unilateral refractory LE.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2018

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 6, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 6, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

February 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Percutaneous Neuromodulation, radial nerve, pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • average pain at palpation

    Numerical rating scale (NRS) (0, points; 10, maximum points).

    Baseline and up to 1 month

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)

    Baseline and up to 1 month

  • radial nerve cross-sectional area (CSA)

    Baseline and up to 1 month

  • Strengt-Duration (SD) curves

    Baseline and up to 1 month

Study Arms (2)

PNM group

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects were treated for 3 weeks, once a week. Specifically, this consisted in the application of a square wave biphasic electrical current, with 10Hz frequency, a 250µs pulse width, and the maximal tolerable intensity to cause an exacerbated muscle contraction for a total of 1.5 mins, according to the protocol by Valera and Minaya. The subjects were seated while their arms were supported by an arm rest, forearms pronated and elbows moderately flexed. The radial nerve was located at 4cm proximal to the tip of the lateral epicondyle of humerus using an ultrasound machine (cross-section), subsequently, an acupuncture needle (0.30mm x 30mm) was inserted in a short axis approach, perpendicular to the surface of the skin, until the perineurium of the radial nerve (in close proximity).

Other: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

the subects of the control group received no any treatment

Interventions

It's a new intervention of sport physiotherapy. It´s an invasive technique. It is necessary an ultrasound

PNM group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of pain in the elbow region at least for three months
  • Flares with activity
  • Tenderness at or within 2cm of the lateral humeral epicondyle on resisted extension of the wrist and/or the third finger.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who had constant or radicular pain
  • Any previous surgery or acute trauma in the upper extremity.
  • Elbow deformity
  • Bilateral symptoms
  • Clinical or electrophysiological findings referable to peripheral nerve (ulnar and median) disease and

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Blanca de La Cruz Torres

Seville, 41010, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tennis ElbowPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Elbow TendinopathyTendinopathyMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesElbow InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesTendon InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • BLANCA DE LA CRUZ, DR

    University of Seville

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PT, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2018

First Posted

February 15, 2018

Study Start

May 6, 2018

Primary Completion

May 6, 2018

Study Completion

June 15, 2018

Last Updated

February 24, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Locations