NCT03432962

Brief Summary

Measuring diet is difficult. This is the first time that brand level foods and nutrient values have been compared with generic food codes to explore the difference this might make to estimated nutrient intakes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 5, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 5, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 14, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 14, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2018

Conditions

Diet RecordsDiet Surveys

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Nutrient intakes by food coding

    comparison of nutrient intakes as a result of the recoding process with brand level data

    24hour recall

Study Arms (1)

Food code group

The participants freely selected foods from the online dietary assessment tool to record what they had eaten over the last 24h. They then provided information on brand details. The recalls were recoded to take into account all branded items and then recoded again to take represent all generic (ie. no brands) foods.

Other: no intervention - recoding of food recall only

Interventions

no intervention - recoding of food recall onlyOTHER

recoding of food recall

Food code group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

In order to reach a broad range of individuals, adult participants from both the University of Leeds and from a convenience sample of members of the public, were invited to participate in the study via email.

You may qualify if:

  • students University of Leeds
  • convenience sample of general public
  • adults

You may not qualify if:

  • none defined

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nutritional Epidemiology Group

Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

Location

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Nutritional Epidemiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2018

First Posted

February 14, 2018

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

May 5, 2016

Study Completion

May 5, 2016

Last Updated

February 14, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

GB(1)