0.2% Chx Gel vs Implant Bacterial Contamination
A Prospective, Randomized-controlled Study of the Effect of a Chlorhexidine Based Gel on the Internal Implant Surface Treatment on the Reduction of Bacterial Load and on the Regressive Bone Modelling.
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this human randomized, double blind, placebo-control (RDBPC) study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel on reducing bacterial load and peri-implant inflammation at implant-abutment interface during the early healing stage.Thirty-six healthy patients (mean age 52,28 years; range 29-75 years) without a significant past medical anamnesis, all non-smokers, will be recruited as candidates for single implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation.Patients will be randomly divided in group A (control) and group B (test) as indicated by the randomization chart. All Implants (Cortex classic, Shalomi, Israel)would be inserted by two skilled operators who followed a two-stage protocol and placed them according to the manufacturer's instructions.Eventually, all patients will be rehabilitated with a single implant-supported crown. During all the stages either a gel containing 0.20% CHX (Plak ®Gel; Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) or a placebo gel (Placebo, Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) will be used. The two gels are perfectly alike in packaging, color and smell and nobody knew the exact location of placebo or test gel, which will be revealed, only after data collection would be performed, by the person who prepared them. A or B gel will be placed on the internal connection abutments and then a cover screw would be inserted. Finally, the site would be sutured with non-absorbable nylon sutures. Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation (CBCT) (VatechIpax 3D PCH-6500, Fort Lee, NJ USA) would be performed both for pre-operative and post-surgical implant placement. Both gels will be given to the patients, according to the protocol, and applied 2 times/day until suture removal after 7 days. Soft tissue biopsies would be performed by means of a circular scalpel (5.5 mm in diameter) at the implant insertion (T0) and after two months of healing (second stage surgery)(T1) to analyze the peri-implant inflammatory infiltrate and the micro-vessel density (MVD) in both groups. All the radiographs taken during the study time points would be analysed to measure the bone resorption after 1 year or on other studt time points.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedFebruary 13, 2018
February 1, 2018
3.2 years
January 15, 2018
February 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
bone resorption around dental implants on both study groups
The bone resorption will be measured on periapical radiographs that would be taken during the clinical phases of the study. It would be used also an individual bite block to assure the reproducibility of the same position during all the phases. The distance between the crestal bone level and the first point where the bone attaches to the implant will be measured. The measurements will be in millimetres.
1 year after implant placement
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Microbiological quantitative evaluation, bacteria count cfu/ml
3 months after implant placement
Study Arms (2)
control group A
PLACEBO COMPARATORon this group a placebo gel will be applied on the internal surface of the implant during all the surgical and prosthetic phases of the treatment.
test group B
EXPERIMENTALon this group a 0.20% chlorhexidine gel will be applied on the internal surface of the implant during all the surgical and prosthetic phases of the treatment described on the study protocol.
Interventions
On control group A once the dental implants are inserted on both mandible or maxilla of the patient placebo (group A) would be applied on the internal surface of the implants on all the surgical or prosthetic phases of the study.
On test group B once the dental implants are inserted on both mandible or maxilla of the patient a 0.20% chlorhexidine gel would be applied on the internal surface of the implants on all the surgical or prosthetic phases of the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients of both sex between 18 and 75 years,
- good systemic and oral health,
- need of single crown implant supported restoration,
- at least six months of healing after tooth extraction,
- cortical bone thickness \> 5 mm measured by means of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
You may not qualify if:
- poor oral hygiene,
- active periodontal disease or other oral disorders,
- insufficient bone thickness for implant insertion,
- bone augmentation procedures,
- immediate loading protocols,
- uncontrolled diabetes mellitus,
- immune diseases,
- smoking
- bruxism.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
G. d'Annunzio University
Chieti, CH, 66100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Sinjari B, D'Addazio G, De Tullio I, Traini T, Caputi S. Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo-A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 16;2018:5326340. doi: 10.1155/2018/5326340. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30410934DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sergio caputi, MD, DDS
g. d'annunzio chieti-pescara university
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- full time professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2018
First Posted
February 13, 2018
Study Start
November 17, 2015
Primary Completion
January 12, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
February 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02