Superior Hypogastric Blockade for Postoperative Pain
The Efficacy of Superior Hypogastric Blockade for Postoperative Pain
1 other identifier
observational
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary indication for superior hypogastric (SHP) block is visceral pelvic pain, most commonly from malignancy of the ovary, uterus, cervix, bladder, rectum or prostate. Percutaneous SHP blocks should be done under guidance of ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance or computed tomography. Because of the close proximity of SHP to major vessels, and structures like vertebral column (for posterior) and guts (for anterior) are being on the way of the needle, these percutaneous blocks are associated with serious complications. Performing SHP during hysterectomy surgery, gives advantages to rule out these complications by exploring the whole intraabdominal anatomy. The investigators' theory is to find out if SHP blocks (during pelvic surgery) are useful for decreasing VAS pain scores and opioid consumption for postoperative pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 3, 2019
CompletedMarch 13, 2024
February 1, 2024
5 months
January 30, 2018
July 24, 2018
February 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative Pain Scores
Patients' pain scores will be scored with a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Each will be scored between 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst pain ever) (PACU: Post-anesthesia care unit) VAS-PACU: VAS scores at PACU VAS 1: VAS scores at postoperative 1st hour (ward) VAS 6: VAS scores at postoperative 6th hour (ward) VAS 12: VAS scores at postoperative 12th hour (ward) VAS 24: VAS scores at postoperative 24th hour (ward) VAS 48: VAS scores at postoperative 48th hour (ward)
postoperative 48 hour follow-up (PACU and ward)
Postoperative Analgesic Consumption
Total number of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and opioid vials that are applied to patients in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at ward will be recorded. Target VAS score for NSAID is \>4; if there is no response to NSAID and pain is worsening opioid drugs will be applied (this is our routine clinical practice) NSAID: Diclofenac sodium 75mg per vial; opioid: Tramadol 100mg per vial.
postoperative 48 hour follow-up (PACU and ward)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Rescue Analgesic Time
48 hours (time to the first analgesic demand will be recorded)
Duration of Operation
from the induction of anesthesia and the end of the surgery
Length of Hospital Stay
assessed up to 1 week
Number of Participants With Complications Due to SHP Block
From the SHP block time (intraoperative) until discharge
Study Arms (2)
Hypo
The participants with a superior hypogastric block
NoHypo
The participants without a superior hypogastric block; the patients with an epidural catheter, who receive a different block technique (ie: TAP block), or who are unsuitable for SHP block (ie: if retro-peritoneum is opened intraoperatively by the surgeon)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
The patients who are scheduled for elective hysterectomy under general anesthesia.
You may qualify if:
- ASA I - II
- Elective hysterectomy
You may not qualify if:
- ASA III
- Different kind of surgery
- Known allergy to local anesthetic drugs
- Different analgesia protocol (ie: epidural, TAP block,..)
- Refusal of the patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Kocaeli, Derince, 41900, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Plancarte R, de Leon-Casasola OA, El-Helaly M, Allende S, Lema MJ. Neurolytic superior hypogastric plexus block for chronic pelvic pain associated with cancer. Reg Anesth. 1997 Nov-Dec;22(6):562-8.
PMID: 9425974BACKGROUNDde Leon-Casasola OA, Kent E, Lema MJ. Neurolytic superior hypogastric plexus block for chronic pelvic pain associated with cancer. Pain. 1993 Aug;54(2):145-151. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90202-Z.
PMID: 8233527BACKGROUNDSindt JE, Brogan SE. Interventional Treatments of Cancer Pain. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Jun;34(2):317-39. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.01.004.
PMID: 27208713BACKGROUNDChoi JW, Kim WH, Lee CJ, Sim WS, Park S, Chae HB. The Optimal Approach for a Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block. Pain Pract. 2018 Mar;18(3):314-321. doi: 10.1111/papr.12603. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
PMID: 28520297BACKGROUNDTurker G, Basagan-Mogol E, Gurbet A, Ozturk C, Uckunkaya N, Sahin S. A new technique for superior hypogastric plexus block: the posteromedian transdiscal approach. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005 Jul;206(3):277-81. doi: 10.1620/tjem.206.277.
PMID: 15942158BACKGROUNDErdine S, Yucel A, Celik M, Talu GK. Transdiscal approach for hypogastric plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;28(4):304-8. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(03)00191-3.
PMID: 12945023BACKGROUNDRapp H, Ledin Eriksson S, Smith P. Superior hypogastric plexus block as a new method of pain relief after abdominal hysterectomy: double-blind, randomised clinical trial of efficacy. BJOG. 2017 Jan;124(2):270-276. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14119. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
PMID: 27292167RESULTAytuluk HG, Kale A, Astepe BS, Basol G, Balci C, Colak T. Superior Hypogastric Plexus Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Abdominal Hysterectomies. Clin J Pain. 2020 Jan;36(1):41-46. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000767.
PMID: 31567396DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr
- Organization
- Derince Training and Research Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hande G. Aytuluk, MD
Derince Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Gulfem Basol, MD
Derince Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Ahmet Kale, Prof
Derince Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Canan Balci, Assoc Prof
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Days
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2018
First Posted
February 9, 2018
Study Start
February 9, 2018
Primary Completion
July 23, 2018
Study Completion
July 24, 2018
Last Updated
March 13, 2024
Results First Posted
June 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators do not prefer to share the study plan and records.