NCT03427047

Brief Summary

Randomized study comparing surgical and economic parameter of Total Knee Arthroplasty performed using two different specific surgical techniques.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 2, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2018

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2022

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 13, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 13, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

February 2, 2018

Results QC Date

March 17, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Compare Time-saving Associated With the Two Procedures.

    Measure clean up time at end of surgery in minutes

    Day of surgery

  • Patient OR Time From Both Study Arms

    Measure skin to skin, tourniquet time and femoral and tibial resection time in minutes

    Day of surgery

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Estimated Blood Loss From Both Study Arms

    Day of surgery

  • Baseline of Hemoglobin Both Study Arms

    Baseline, 1 day post-op or at discharge from hospital

  • Volume of Transfusions Both Study Arms

    Day of surgery

  • Instrument Trays Sent to Sterilization Both Study Arms

    Day of surgery

  • Amount of Waste From Surgery Both Study Arms

    Day of surgery

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

MyKnee with single use Efficiency Instrument

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized in this group will undergo Total Knee Arthroplasty utilizing patient matched cutting blocks and single use instruments. Customization will be by a CT scan of patients knee.

Device: MyKnee with single use Efficiency Instrument

Stryker Navigational with conventional metal instruments

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized in this group will undergo Total Knee Arthroplasty with conventional metal instruments. CT scan are not utilized with this arm.

Device: Stryker Navigational with conventional metal instruments

Interventions

Total Knee Arthroplasty utilizing a CT scan for customization of cutting blocks with single use instrumentation

MyKnee with single use Efficiency Instrument

Total Knee Arthroplasty without customization of cutting blocks using conventional metal instruments.

Stryker Navigational with conventional metal instruments

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 75 years 2) BMI ≤35 3) Undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis (primary or post-traumatic OA) with the Medacta GMK Sphere 4) Able and willing to give consent and to comply with study requirements, including follow up visit at 6 weeks

You may not qualify if:

  • Is participating in another clinical study 2) Has inflammatory arthritis 3) Has knee avascular necrosis 4) Has severe deformity, defined as greater than 15 degrees varus or 10 degrees valgus relative to the mechanical axis. 5) Has retained hardware in the knee that requires removal and interferes with TKA procedure 6) Has prior high tibial osteotomy (HTO)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Methodist Sports Medicine Research & Education Foundation

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46280, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Rena Mandino, Director, Clinical Research
Organization
Medacta USA

Study Officials

  • John Hur, MD

    Forte Sports Medicine and Orthopedics

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2018

First Posted

February 9, 2018

Study Start

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion

January 1, 2022

Study Completion

January 1, 2022

Last Updated

June 13, 2023

Results First Posted

June 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Locations