Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Using Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Versus Flexible Intubation Video Endoscope (FIVE) in Obese Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Tracheal intubation is one of the most common medical procedures performed in hospitals. On one hand, it is highly successful and easy to perform using a rigid laryngoscope. On the other hand, hypoxic brain damage and death may result rapidly if it is unsuccessful. This disastrous outcome happens when the airway cannot be secured by intubation and face mask ventilation becomes difficult. Careful preoperative evaluation to identify patients in whom tracheal intubation and mask ventilation may prove to be difficult can save lives. Over the past 40 years, different techniques of tracheal intubation have been introduced, the most effective under different conditions being fiberoptic intubation. The flexible intubation video endoscope is a relatively new device which delivers clear, pixel-free images without a Moiré pattern. The flexible intubation video endoscope can be directly connected to the C-MAC® monitor. Due to the Distal Chip technology the user enjoys a full-format direct video imaging with improved image quality with a resolution higher than fiberoptic bronchoscopy which has another disadvantage of being Fragile where Fibres can be broken or have transmission loss when wrapped around curves of only a few centimeters radius. After ethics approval and informed consent from patients, 60 obese patients aging from 20-60 years will randomly allocated and divided into two groups each is (Thirty) patients in each group, using flexible intubation video endoscope(FIVE) in (group1) and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in (group 2). The study will compare the techniques for time of intubation, hemodynamic (SBP, DBP and HR) changes, success rate, number of attempts and complications in both groups. investigators expect from this study that flexible intubation video endoscope(FIVE) has become a good alternative and associated with better visualization of laryngeal structures in shorter time as compared to traditional flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 11, 2018
CompletedMarch 16, 2018
March 1, 2018
1 month
December 26, 2017
March 14, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful intubation
Time in Minutes of successful intubation.
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rate of first successful intubation
Intraoperative
Second trial for successful intubation
Intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy
EXPERIMENTALFiberoptic intubation has been considered for a long time the gold standard technique for intubation when there is anticipated or known difficult airway or as a rescue device in can't intubate but can ventilate scenarios
Fexible intubation video endoscopy
EXPERIMENTALVideo-assisted techniques allow to indirectly visualize the laryngeal structures with fiber optical or camera chip technique and to show the video picture on an external or built-in monitor
Interventions
Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy versus flexible intubation video endoscope regarding intubation time in obese patients
Fexible intubation video endoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 20 and 50 years.
- Scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation.
- Patient with ASA physical status I-II.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to give consent
- Patient with ASA physical status more than II.
- Age \< 20years old and \>50years
- Pregnant patient.
- Known, difficult airway
- Loose teeth
- Require a rapid sequence induction,
- If special endotracheal tube (ETT) is needed for the case.
- Emergency surgeries
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
- Mohamed, Ahmed A., M.D.collaborator
- Mai Wedad Ahmedcollaborator
- Norhan Abdelaleem Alicollaborator
- Magdy Abdelmohsen Elsayedcollaborator
- Atef Kamel Salamacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed
Cairo, 11451, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- In this prospective randomized controlled study 60 patients with ASA physical status Ӏ-ӀӀ, aging 20-50 years will be randomly allocated into two groups, 30 patients in each group
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesia&I.C.U and Pain Clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 26, 2017
First Posted
February 6, 2018
Study Start
January 4, 2018
Primary Completion
February 5, 2018
Study Completion
February 11, 2018
Last Updated
March 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Via scholar Gate