Acceptability and Tolerability of Magnetic Assisted Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Gastroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dyspepsia is a common presenting complaint that doctors have to manage and this is true both in the primary and secondary care setting. OGD is a useful test for investigating a variety of suspected upper GI disorders including dyspepsia. However, it is uncomfortable for patients and incurs the risk of intubation and sedation. Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the investigation of choice for diseases of the small bowel. It is safe, non-invasive and well tolerated, the main risk being capsule retention occurring in up to 1-2% of procedures. The investigators wish to undertake a prospective study comparing acceptability and tolerability of MACE and OGD in the investigation of dyspepsia. Patients presenting to general practice or the outpatients department with symptoms of dyspepsia who are referred for investigation are invited to take part in the study. Patients will undergo MACE prior to OGD performed by an endoscopist blinded to the MACE findings. . A comparison of tolerance and acceptance of both procedures will be measured by means of using structured and validated, qualitative questionnaires. The aim is to assess for whether there is a significant difference between the perception and experience of both modalities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedApril 25, 2024
April 1, 2024
3.5 years
January 29, 2018
April 23, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Endoscopy Concerns Score
Differences in the Endoscopy Concerns Score (ECS) when patients have magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy (MACE) and when they have conventional gastroscopy
procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinician rating of visualization of upper GI Tract
procedure
Study Arms (2)
magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will undergo magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy at the sloan medical centre
gastroscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll participants will undergo gastroscopy as standard of care at sheffield teaching hospitals
Interventions
a thin, flexible tube called an end oscope is used to look inside the oesophagus (gullet), stomach and first part of the small intestine (duodenum)
The patient will be given 500 to 1000mls of water with 6 drops of simethicone added to drink. This is to enable adequate distension of the stomach. The patient then swallows the capsule in the presence of the PI. MACE of the oesophagus and stomach will be carried out by the PI. Once the PI is satisfied that an adequate examination has been completed the capsule will be allowed to pass into and through the small bowel.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 years and over and up to but not exceeding 80 years
- Patients presenting symptoms of dyspepsia whom require gastroscopy as per national guidelines
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under the age of 18 years
- Patients over the age of 80 years
- Active vomiting
- Patients with a permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or REVEAL device
- Patients with any electronic/magnetic/mechanically controlled devices e.g. sacral nerve stimulators, bladder stimulators
- Patients with dysphagia, odynophagia or known swallowing disorder
- Patients with known Zenker's diverticulum
- Patients with suspected bowel obstruction or bowel perforation
- Patients with prior bowel obstruction
- Patients with gastroparesis or known gastric outlet obstruction
- Patients with known Crohn's disease
- Patients who are taking daily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (excluding prophylactic doses of aspirin) for more than six months
- Patients who have received abdominopelvic radiotherapy treatment
- Patients with a history of GI tract surgery (Billroth I, Billroth II, Oesophagectomy, gastrectomy or bariatric procedure)
- Patients that are pregnant or lactating
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark McAlindon
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2018
First Posted
February 5, 2018
Study Start
March 7, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04