Electromyographic Estimation of Neuro-muscular Coordination of Masticatory Muscles in Patients Treated With Implants (D-2012-057)
1 other identifier
interventional
105
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The result of the study will demonstrate that the functional activity of maxillofacial area with edentulous posterior bounded spaces recovers more effectively in patients treated with restorations on implants comparing to patients treated with fixed dentures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedJanuary 30, 2018
January 1, 2018
3 months
January 28, 2016
January 23, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The signals were averaged over 25 ms, with muscle activity assessed as the root mean square (RMS) of the amplitude (µV). sEMG signals were recorded for further analysis.
The present study demonstrated that Osseo Speed implants are safe and reasonable way of treatment for partial tooth loss in the lateral side. There was observed healthy soft tissue and marginal bone stability around the implants. Received data analysis using surface EMG allow to assume than functional state of maxillofacial region and neuromuscular coordination of the muscles of mastication in patients with bounded edentulous space in the lateral side (molars and/or premolars) with implant-supported prosthesis is considerably better than in patients with fixed bridges. Implant-supported prosthesis provide greater bite force for chewing function in comparison with fixed bridges , but certainly less effective than natural teeth. Implant-supported prosthesis increase patients' quality of life and is more convenient for dentoalveolar apparatus.
up to 3 months.
Study Arms (3)
ASTRA TECH implants
ACTIVE COMPARATORimplant restoration(replace of a missing tooth) - 35 patients
CROWN
ACTIVE COMPARATORto fixed denture restorations in own teeth - 32 patients
non-edontulos
PLACEBO COMPARATORcontrol group will consist 38 non-edotulos patients
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Partially edentulous bounded space in dental arch (not more that 3 teeth absent)
- Patients ages 20-45 y.o.
You may not qualify if:
- Chronical third-degree cardiac failure
- Connective tissue diseases
- Decompensated diabetes
- Neoplastic processes
- Strokes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2016
First Posted
January 30, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 23, 2018
Last Updated
January 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01