Ethanol Gel Versus Steroid in Refractory Lumbar Discogenic Pain
IDIS
Intradiscal Gelified Ethanol Versus Intradiscal Steroid in Refractory Lumbar Discogenic Pain: a Randomized Single-blind Study
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
5
Brief Summary
DISCOGEL® is on the market since 2007. About 20,000 kits were sold to date (October 2017). The device re-obtained its CE mark in 2017. A clinical evaluation was performed by bibliographic route in 2016. Clinical data on more than 600 patients treated by DISCOGEL® were analyzed. These data should be confirmed by monitoring on the long term, with a large cohort of patients, over a two-year follow-up period. As part of the post-CE surveillance, the manufacturer GELSCOM is responsible of this "Post-Market Clinical Follow-up" (PMCF) study in accordance with Directive 93/42/EEC and MEDDEV guide 2.12/2, to assess the efficacy and the long-term safety of DISCOGEL®. The study is comparative. The results will evaluate the performance and safety of the CE-marked medical device used in "real life", in comparison with a steroid infiltration, used according to its indication and to the current standards. It will include economic data. Patients and evaluators will be blinded. Both DISCOGEL® and HYDROCORTANCYL 2,5 POUR CENT are authorized products used according to their intended use. This is an interventional, prospective, national, multi-center, comparative, randomized, single-blind (patient and evaluator) post-market clinical study. The primary objective is to compare the short-term efficacy profile of DISCOGEL® versus intradiscal steroid.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2027
ExpectedSeptember 29, 2025
September 1, 2025
5.8 years
January 9, 2018
September 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Short-term efficacy profile
Compare the short-term efficacy profile of DISCOGEL® versus intradiscal steroid: percentage of patients with a pain relief defined by a Low Back Pain (LBP) intensity\<4 cm on a Local Verbal Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 10 = maximum imaginable pain)
Month 3
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Long-term efficacy profile
Month 12
Long-term efficacy profile
Month 24
Short-term safety profile
Month 3
Long-term safety profile
Month 12
Long-term safety profile
Month 24
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ethanol gel
EXPERIMENTALCE-marked medical device used according to its instructions for use: GELSCOM® Single injection in the selected disc(s) of 0.6 to 2.2 ml
Steroid infiltration
ACTIVE COMPARATORAuthorized drug used according to its summary product characteristics: HYDROCORTANCYL 2,5 POUR CENT Single injection in the selected disc(s) of 0.2 to 2.0 ml
Interventions
Intradiscal infiltration of steroids
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient 18 years of age or older;
- month refractory pain to conservative treatment, non-surgical patients;
- Chronic discogenic pain (1 or 2 lumbar discs) with concordant MR imaging;
- Symptomatic for at least 8 weeks despite appropriate medical treatment;
- Patient who agrees to participate in the study and who signed the informed consent form;
- Patient with social protection.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgical treatment of the studied disc(s);
- Patient with pure radicular pain;
- Sick leave of more than 12 months secondary to the symptoms;
- Patients who cannot read or write French;
- History of cognitive-behavioral disorders that could interact with assessment by self-questionnaire;
- Local or general infection, or suspicion of infection;
- Severe coagulation disorders;
- Other rheumatic inflammatory disease;
- Undercurrent serious pathology with life expectancy \< 2 years;
- Subject who has forfeited their freedom by administrative or legal award, or is under guardianship or under limited judicial protection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gelscom SASlead
- CEISOcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Hospital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, France
Hospital St-Dié-des-Vosges
Saint-Dié, France
Hospital SUD La Reunion
Saint-Pierre, France
Hospital St-Etienne
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
Hospital Valence
Valence, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mathieu de Sèze, Dr
CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2018
First Posted
January 30, 2018
Study Start
May 29, 2018
Primary Completion
February 29, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 29, 2027
Last Updated
September 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share