Comparison of Chloroprocaine vs Lidocaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery
A Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing 3% Chloroprocaine Versus 2 % Lidocaine/ Epinephrine/ Bicarbonate/ Fentanyl for Epidural Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Regional anesthesia is commonly used for elective and emergency cesarean delivery. It provides numerous safety advantages when compared to general anesthesia for both the mother and fetus1. Epidurals also have the added benefit of being able to provide pain relief throughout labor and in the event of cesarean delivery, epidural analgesia can be "extended" to provide surgical anesthesia. Numerous studies have been performed to assess the onset times of various local anesthetics when administered through an epidural catheter. Attempts to reduce anesthetic onset time and improve the quality of intraoperative analgesia have been attempted by using different local anesthetic solutions and by the addition of other drugs to the epidural solution (such as epinephrine, fentanyl and sodium bicarbonate).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 27, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2020
CompletedApril 13, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.1 years
January 22, 2018
February 12, 2020
March 30, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Onset Time to Surgical Anesthesia
The onset time to surgical anesthesia, as reported by the participant using a standard procedure This will be measured by the time taken from the end of the epidural loading dose to develop a loss of touch sensation using a neurotip® (Owen Mumford, USA) device bilaterally at the T7 dermatomal level using a non-inferiority study design. A non-inferiority limit of 3 minutes was chosen apriori.
Up to 35 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary Outcome: Number of Participants With Requirement for Intraoperative Analgesia Supplementation
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
2% Lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup LEBF received 20 ml of 2% lidocaine (combined with the following adjuncts \[0.15 ml of 0.1% epinephrine, 2 ml of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate and 2 ml of 100 mcg fentanyl
3% Chloroprocaine
EXPERIMENTAL20 ml of 3% chloroprocaine with 4 ml 0.9% sodium chloride
Interventions
2% Lidocaine using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE)
3% Chloroprocaine using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years of age for the mother
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestation \> 36 weeks
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class II
- Provides written consent
- Infant of mother
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Non-elective or urgent/emergent cesarean sections
- ASA class III or above
- Unable to understand English
- Significant back surgery or scoliosis
- Known fetal abnormality
- Weight \> 120 kg
- Height \< 150 cm
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Concurrent use of sulfonamides
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Related Publications (1)
Sharawi N, Bansal P, Williams M, Spencer H, Mhyre JM. Comparison of Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine With Epinephrine, Sodium Bicarbonate, and Fentanyl for Epidural Extension Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Noninferiority Study. Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):666-675. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005141.
PMID: 32852294DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nadir El Sharawi
- Organization
- UAMS
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nadir Sharawi, MD
University of Arkansas
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2018
First Posted
January 29, 2018
Study Start
February 15, 2018
Primary Completion
March 27, 2019
Study Completion
March 27, 2019
Last Updated
April 13, 2020
Results First Posted
April 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share