Predicting Fluid Responsiveness Using Transiently Increased Intrathoracic Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to identify in patients requiring active fluid resuscitation and mechanical ventilation for circulatory shock, can a controlled increase in intrathoracic pressure (either by positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or tidal volume (TV)) predict responsiveness to additional fluid resuscitation. We hypothesize that a temporary, physiologically-safe increase in positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and/or a temporary increase in tidal volume (from 6 cc/kg predicted body weight (PBW) to 8 cc/kg PBW) in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will predict fluid responsiveness based upon an assessment of the change in pulse pressure and stroke volume variation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 13, 2018
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
9 months
January 11, 2018
January 15, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pulse Pressure Variation
Temporary increase in intrathoracic pressure (PEEP or TV) will predict fluid responsiveness using an absolute increase in pulse pressure variation by 3% or more.
Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Heart Rate
Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge
Mean Arterial Pressure
Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge
Mortality
7 days
Stroke Volume Variation
Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge
End-tidal carbon dioxide
Following 60 seconds of intrathoracic pressure challenge
Study Arms (2)
Fluid responders
OTHERPatient's identified to have a significant increase in their cardiac output following a fluid bolus.
Fluid non-responders
OTHERPatient's identified to NOT have a significant increase in their cardiac output following a fluid bolus.
Interventions
Will transiently increase intrathoracic pressure for 60 seconds and monitor for changes in hemodynamics during this time.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mechanically ventilated
- Identified by treatment team as requiring intravenous fluid bolus
- Acute circulatory failure during admission (systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≤70 mmHg or requiring vasopressors to maintain SBP \>90 mmHg or MAP \>70 mmHg, along with one or more of the following:
- urinary flow ≤0.5 mL/kg/min for ≥2 hours,
- heart rate ≥100 beats per minute
- presence of skin mottling
- blood lactate concentration ≥4 mmol/L
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to fluid bolus
- Assynchrony Index \> 10%
- Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia
- Severe valvular heart disease
- Chest tubes with air leak
- Abdominal compartment syndrome
- Pregnancy
- Concurrent nebulized medication or inhaled nitric oxide
- Transthoracic echogenicity unsuitable for measuring velocity-time integral of aortic blood flow (SVI)
- Prisoner
- Clinical brain death
- PEEP \> 15 cmH2O
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Adams, MD
Attending Physician
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2018
First Posted
January 29, 2018
Study Start
December 27, 2017
Primary Completion
September 13, 2018
Study Completion
September 13, 2018
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01