NCT03408249

Brief Summary

The objective of the IBDoc® user performance evaluation is to demonstrate the ease-of-use of the IBDoc® calprotectin home test to allow patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to independently and correctly determine calprotectin concentration in their own stool sample. The study is based on Chapter 8 of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standard, ISO 15197:2013 "In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus". The study is a prospective, multicenter study, not blinded for patients, and includes a total of 61 patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 5, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 22, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 22, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2018

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 24, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

January 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, fecal calprotectin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Trueness/ accuracy of patients IBDoc® results

    Patients' IBDoc results are compared to reference calprotectin values obtained by laboratory methods

    24 hours

  • Quantifiable feedback from the enrolled patients about the ease-of-use of the test

    Ease-of-use of the test, clearness of test results and comprehensiveness of the instructions for use is assessed in a questionnaire, with 12 statements, scored on a 1-to-5 Likert scale, with one (1) indicating "I strongly disagree" and five (5) "I strongly agree". The mean and standard deviation of scores obtained from all participating patients will be evaluated for each statement.

    24 hours

  • Quantifiable feedback from healthcare providers

    Quantifiable feedback from the healthcare providers about the ability of the patients to correctly perform the IBDoc® assay. Assessment will be made through a questionnaire with five (5) statements, scored on a 1-to-5 Likert scale, with one (1) indicating "I strongly disagree" and five (5) "I strongly agree". The mean and standard deviation of scores obtained from all participating healthcare providers will be evaluated for each statement.

    24 hours

Study Arms (1)

IBD patients

EXPERIMENTAL

IBD patients performing IBDoc calprotectin test and ease-of-use questionnaires

Diagnostic Test: IBDoc calprotectin testOther: questionnaire

Interventions

Patients are asked to perform a single IBDoc calprotectin home test.

IBD patients

Patients evaluate the ease-of-use of the test, clearness of test results and comprehensiveness of the instructions for use through a specific questionnaire implementing Likert scales.

IBD patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients \> 12 years
  • IBD Outpatients from a tertiary gastroenterological health care center willing to participate.
  • At least 30% patients should display active disease. This can be defined by a Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) \> 5 in CD and a clinical Mayo score \> 2 in UC
  • Remaining patients in clinical remission or only mildly active disease defined by a HBI\<7 in CD and a clinical Mayo score \< 3 in UC with a stable medical treatment
  • In case of a prescribed endoscopy, the observation period starts \>3 days after colonoscopy
  • Stable care of a treating physician
  • Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Other known pathology or predisposition that may interfere with the ability to perform the measurement procedures or that may influence calprotectin levels such as acute diarrhea or chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Inability to understand the procedures
  • Inability to psychologically handle potential test outcomes

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Alberta,

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R7, Canada

Location

GIRI (GI Research Institute)

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5, Canada

Location

Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis,

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Moore AC, Huang VW, Bourdages R, Fedorak RN, Reinhard C, Leung Y, Bressler B, Rosenfeld G. IBDoc Canadian User Performance Evaluation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 May 4;25(6):1107-1114. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy357.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesCrohn DiseaseColitis, Ulcerative

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesColitisColonic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Greg Rosenfeld, MD

    GIRI (GI Research Institute), Vancouver, Canada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2018

First Posted

January 23, 2018

Study Start

May 5, 2017

Primary Completion

August 22, 2017

Study Completion

August 22, 2017

Last Updated

January 24, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations