NCT03403764

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the potential for a new kind of wellness improvement intervention, utilizing the cutting edge model of William Tiller, PhD, material scientist and Stanford Professor Emeritus. The Tiller model suggests that through the use of focused human intentionality, the investigators can impact many things, one of which is the wellness of a population. Prof. Tiller's research found that intention in the form of information can be imprinted on a simple electric device, called an Intention-Host Device, or IHD. This device then energetically broadcasts (or transmits) this information to the study participants. This present study examines what effect an intention broadcasted from an IHD has on well defined outcome variables in adult subjects, namely self-compassion, wellness, and awakening in adults.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
230

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 19, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 2, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

November 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 29, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

IntentionDistant HealingWellnessDistant IntentionalityDistant Healing Intention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Neff Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form

    The Neff Short Form consists of 12 questions cover Self-Kindness (2, 6), Self-Judgment (11, 12), Common Humanity (5, 10), Isolation (4, 8), Mindfulness (3, 7), Over-Identification (1, 9) and they are rated on a Likert scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always) with the total score derived by adding the means of each subscale together. The 6 subscales measure an individual's level of self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness and over-identification. Sub scale scores are calculated as the mean of the sub scale items. The total self-compassion score reverses the negative sub scale items of self-judgment, isolation, over-identification (i.e. 1=5, 2=4, 3=3, 4=2, 1=5) to compute a total mean. Change from baseline for total and subscales are tracked. Higher scores indicate higher self-compassion

    18 months

  • NIH PROMIS Global Health Short Form

    PROMIS® Global Health Short Form (10 items). The 10 global health items include ratings of the five core PROMIS domains. It includes the most widely used self-rated health item (global01). PROMIS® includes a single item that provides a pure rating of physical health (global03) and another item for mental health (global04). Also included is an overall quality of life item (global02). The remaining items provide global ratings of physical function (global06), fatigue (global08), pain (global07), emotional distress (global10), and social health (global05 and global09). The 10 PROMIS® Global Health items each have 5 response choices, with the exception of the common 11-point pain intensity item ("How would you rate your pain on average" with 0=No pain and 10=Worst imaginable pain). Global 1-5, 9 range from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor), with higher numbers meaning greater health. Certain items are restored (Global 7 such that 5=0 no pain, and 1=10 worst pain), Global8 (5=None, 1=Very Severe),

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The text analysis Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (2007)

    18 months

  • Barrett Values Inventory

    18 months

Study Arms (2)

Wellness Intention Transmission Groups

EXPERIMENTAL

Aim of this part of the study is to examine whether intention broadcasted from an Intention Host Device (a device which stores and transmits an intention) will affect self-compassion, general wellness, and awakening. 300 trial participants will be randomly allocated to 1/3 in control and 2/3 in the experimental IHD group, respectively. Differences in outcomes between control and experimental groups are expected. To address potential bias, those who enter the study but drop out are compared to those who complete the study to gauge potential differences between the two groups, and will report on this potential bias in the published manuscript.

Other: Wellness Intention

Independent Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Due to the "global, emergent entanglement" phenomenon, the investigators are curious if the investigators can test this idea within the context of the proposed study. The investigators added an additional but smaller control group which will complete the same three questionnaires for the first 6 months only and will be unaware of the larger study being conducted. These 50 subjects will be told they are completing the questionnaires in the context of a distinct, separate study and will be unaware of the Consciousness Field Project.

Interventions

Also known as: Distant Intentionality
Wellness Intention Transmission Groups

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • volunteers over age 18 speaking English

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who cannot read, anybody with a legally authorized representative (LAR), site/sponsor employees directly involved with the study and their family members, site/sponsor employees NOT directly involved with the study and their family members, statutory minors

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Merraki Institute

Palo Alto, California, 94303, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Radin D, Hayssen G, Walsh J. Effects of intentionally enhanced chocolate on mood. Explore (NY). 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2007.06.004.

    PMID: 17905358BACKGROUND
  • Radin D, Schlitz M, Baur C. Distant Healing Intention Therapies: An Overview of the Scientific Evidence. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Nov;4(Suppl):67-71. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2015.012.suppl. Epub 2015 Nov 1.

    PMID: 26665044BACKGROUND
  • Targ E. Evaluating distant healing: a research review. Altern Ther Health Med. 1997 Nov;3(6):74-8.

    PMID: 9375432BACKGROUND
  • Nisha Manek, William Tiller. Feasibility of Information Medicine as Delivered by Intention Host Devices: A Case Report Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 Nov; 2(Suppl): S152. Published online 2013 Nov 1. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.097CP.P05.09 PMCID: PMC3875095

    BACKGROUND
  • Hyland ME. Does a form of 'entanglement' between people explain healing? An examination of hypotheses and methodology. Complement Ther Med. 2004 Dec;12(4):198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.10.002.

    PMID: 15649833BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Paul Mills, Ph.D.

    Professor of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The investigator and participants involved in this clinical trial are prevented from having knowledge which intervention is assigned to individual participants. A second control group has no knowledge of the parallel conducted Consciousness Field Project.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants receive one of two alternative interventions during the initial phase of the study and receive the other intervention during the second phase of the study and are evaluated in parallel against a control group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2017

First Posted

January 19, 2018

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

November 1, 2019

Study Completion

November 1, 2019

Last Updated

January 2, 2020

Record last verified: 2019-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations