Consciousness Field Project: Intention Host Device-mediated Distant Intentionality
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the potential for a new kind of wellness improvement intervention, utilizing the cutting edge model of William Tiller, PhD, material scientist and Stanford Professor Emeritus. The Tiller model suggests that through the use of focused human intentionality, the investigators can impact many things, one of which is the wellness of a population. Prof. Tiller's research found that intention in the form of information can be imprinted on a simple electric device, called an Intention-Host Device, or IHD. This device then energetically broadcasts (or transmits) this information to the study participants. This present study examines what effect an intention broadcasted from an IHD has on well defined outcome variables in adult subjects, namely self-compassion, wellness, and awakening in adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2019
CompletedJanuary 2, 2020
December 1, 2019
3.6 years
November 19, 2017
December 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Neff Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form
The Neff Short Form consists of 12 questions cover Self-Kindness (2, 6), Self-Judgment (11, 12), Common Humanity (5, 10), Isolation (4, 8), Mindfulness (3, 7), Over-Identification (1, 9) and they are rated on a Likert scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always) with the total score derived by adding the means of each subscale together. The 6 subscales measure an individual's level of self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness and over-identification. Sub scale scores are calculated as the mean of the sub scale items. The total self-compassion score reverses the negative sub scale items of self-judgment, isolation, over-identification (i.e. 1=5, 2=4, 3=3, 4=2, 1=5) to compute a total mean. Change from baseline for total and subscales are tracked. Higher scores indicate higher self-compassion
18 months
NIH PROMIS Global Health Short Form
PROMIS® Global Health Short Form (10 items). The 10 global health items include ratings of the five core PROMIS domains. It includes the most widely used self-rated health item (global01). PROMIS® includes a single item that provides a pure rating of physical health (global03) and another item for mental health (global04). Also included is an overall quality of life item (global02). The remaining items provide global ratings of physical function (global06), fatigue (global08), pain (global07), emotional distress (global10), and social health (global05 and global09). The 10 PROMIS® Global Health items each have 5 response choices, with the exception of the common 11-point pain intensity item ("How would you rate your pain on average" with 0=No pain and 10=Worst imaginable pain). Global 1-5, 9 range from 5 (Excellent) to 1 (Poor), with higher numbers meaning greater health. Certain items are restored (Global 7 such that 5=0 no pain, and 1=10 worst pain), Global8 (5=None, 1=Very Severe),
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The text analysis Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (2007)
18 months
Barrett Values Inventory
18 months
Study Arms (2)
Wellness Intention Transmission Groups
EXPERIMENTALAim of this part of the study is to examine whether intention broadcasted from an Intention Host Device (a device which stores and transmits an intention) will affect self-compassion, general wellness, and awakening. 300 trial participants will be randomly allocated to 1/3 in control and 2/3 in the experimental IHD group, respectively. Differences in outcomes between control and experimental groups are expected. To address potential bias, those who enter the study but drop out are compared to those who complete the study to gauge potential differences between the two groups, and will report on this potential bias in the published manuscript.
Independent Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONDue to the "global, emergent entanglement" phenomenon, the investigators are curious if the investigators can test this idea within the context of the proposed study. The investigators added an additional but smaller control group which will complete the same three questionnaires for the first 6 months only and will be unaware of the larger study being conducted. These 50 subjects will be told they are completing the questionnaires in the context of a distinct, separate study and will be unaware of the Consciousness Field Project.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- volunteers over age 18 speaking English
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who cannot read, anybody with a legally authorized representative (LAR), site/sponsor employees directly involved with the study and their family members, site/sponsor employees NOT directly involved with the study and their family members, statutory minors
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Merraki Institutelead
- University of California, San Diegocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Merraki Institute
Palo Alto, California, 94303, United States
Related Publications (5)
Radin D, Hayssen G, Walsh J. Effects of intentionally enhanced chocolate on mood. Explore (NY). 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2007.06.004.
PMID: 17905358BACKGROUNDRadin D, Schlitz M, Baur C. Distant Healing Intention Therapies: An Overview of the Scientific Evidence. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Nov;4(Suppl):67-71. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2015.012.suppl. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
PMID: 26665044BACKGROUNDTarg E. Evaluating distant healing: a research review. Altern Ther Health Med. 1997 Nov;3(6):74-8.
PMID: 9375432BACKGROUNDNisha Manek, William Tiller. Feasibility of Information Medicine as Delivered by Intention Host Devices: A Case Report Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 Nov; 2(Suppl): S152. Published online 2013 Nov 1. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.097CP.P05.09 PMCID: PMC3875095
BACKGROUNDHyland ME. Does a form of 'entanglement' between people explain healing? An examination of hypotheses and methodology. Complement Ther Med. 2004 Dec;12(4):198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.10.002.
PMID: 15649833BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paul Mills, Ph.D.
Professor of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator and participants involved in this clinical trial are prevented from having knowledge which intervention is assigned to individual participants. A second control group has no knowledge of the parallel conducted Consciousness Field Project.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2017
First Posted
January 19, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share