Impact of Local Anesthetic Volume During Ultrasound-guided Stellate Ganglion Block
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the temperature changes of the upper extremities when using local anesthetic of various volume (4ml, 6ml, 8ml) in the ultrasound guided stellate ganglion block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2018
CompletedJune 25, 2019
June 1, 2019
8 months
January 4, 2018
June 23, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Temperature change(°C) in ipsilateral arm
Temperature is measured with a laser thermometer on the palmar aspect of 3 cm below from the middle finger.
thirty minute after US-guided SGB
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Temperature changes(°C) in ipsilateral arm
10 and 20 min after US-guided SGB
Temperature changes in ipsilateral face
10, 20, and 30 min after US-guided SGB
Temperature changes in contralateral face
10, 20, and 30 min after US-guided SGB
Temperature changes in ipsilateral medial elbow
10, 20, and 30 min after US-guided SGB
Temperature changes in contralateral medial elbow
10, 20, and 30 min after US-guided SGB
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
4 ml of 1% lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure: 4 ml of 1% lidocaine is injected for stellate ganglion block using the Ultrasound(US)-guided lateral approach at the sixth cervical vertebral level.
6 ml of 1% lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure: 6 ml of 1% lidocaine is injected for stellate ganglion block using the US-guided lateral approach at the sixth cervical vertebral level.
8 ml of 1% lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure: 8 ml of 1% lidocaine is injected for stellate ganglion block using the US-guided lateral approach at the sixth cervical vertebral level.
Interventions
Well trained pain physician performs all the ultrasound(US)-guided stellate ganglion block(SGB)s, who is not involved in evaluating study variables. Electrocardiography, noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation were monitored for all patients before, while, and after conducting procedure. For US-guided SGB, patients are supine positioned, and skin preparation on injection site is done with chlorohexidine. Procedure is conducted under ultrasound guidance at C6 level. 4 ml, 6 ml, and 8 ml of 1% lidocaine is injected for the each group, respectively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 to 85 years
- Patients with a new or known diagnosis of chronic neuropathic pain at the upper extremity or face.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of a patient
- Any vascular disease in the upper extremities (or face)
- Previous history of thoracic sympathetic or stellate ganglion neurolysis (e.g. thermocoagulation, radiofrequency neuromodulation, and/or chemical neurolysis)
- Coagulopathy
- Systemic infection or local infection at the needle injection site
- Major deformation at the level of the neck (radiotherapy, surgery, etc.)
- Concomitant chronic pain syndrome at other sites.
- Post-pneumonectomy on the controlateral side
- Known allergy to local anesthetics of amide type
- Inability to understand a numeric rating pain scale (cognitive dysfunction)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (4)
Kapral S, Krafft P, Gosch M, Fleischmann D, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound imaging for stellate ganglion block: direct visualization of puncture site and local anesthetic spread. A pilot study. Reg Anesth. 1995 Jul-Aug;20(4):323-8.
PMID: 7577781BACKGROUNDSchurmann M, Gradl G, Wizgal I, Tutic M, Moser C, Azad S, Beyer A. Clinical and physiologic evaluation of stellate ganglion blockade for complex regional pain syndrome type I. Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):94-100. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200103000-00012.
PMID: 11289093BACKGROUNDJung G, Kim BS, Shin KB, Park KB, Kim SY, Song SO. The optimal volume of 0.2% ropivacaine required for an ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Mar;60(3):179-84. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.60.3.179. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
PMID: 21490819RESULTStevens RA, Stotz A, Kao TC, Powar M, Burgess S, Kleinman B. The relative increase in skin temperature after stellate ganglion block is predictive of a complete sympathectomy of the hand. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 May-Jun;23(3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90053-0.
PMID: 9613538RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jee Youn Moon, MD, PhD
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2018
First Posted
January 17, 2018
Study Start
November 21, 2017
Primary Completion
July 21, 2018
Study Completion
July 31, 2018
Last Updated
June 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share