Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine
1 other identifier
interventional
144
2 countries
10
Brief Summary
The efficacy of intranasal kinetic oscillation stimulation using the Chordate System S211 as a preventative treatment will be examined in patients diagnosed with chronic migraine. The medical device system will be applied in 6 treatments at weekly intervals. The study will examine the effects on monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 6, 2025
CompletedJanuary 6, 2025
November 1, 2024
4.4 years
January 9, 2018
February 18, 2024
November 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.
Least square mean change from Baseline (4-week screening period) in monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity in 4-week performance assessment period.
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active Treatment
EXPERIMENTALSham Treatment
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is legally competent, has been informed of the nature, the scope and the relevance of the study, voluntarily agrees to participation and the study's provisions, and has duly signed the informed consent form (ICF);
- Male or female aged between 18 and 65 years (inclusive) at the time of providing informed consent;
- Diagnosed as suffering from chronic migraine with or without aura (≥15 headache days per month for more than 3 months before screening including at least 8 migraine days) according to the IHS classification (International Classification of Headache Disorders \[ICHD\]-III beta);
- Migraine onset before the age of 60 years;
- Reported history of migraine for at least 1 year before screening;
- Reported stable prophylactic migraine medication regimen, if any, during the 3 months prior to screening;
- Able and willing to maintain current prophylactic migraine medication regimen (no change in type, frequency or dose) from screening to end of follow-up;
- Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use highly effective contraceptive methods (failure rate \<1% per year when used consistently and correctly) during the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to distinguish between migraine headaches and other headache types;
- Treatment with Botox in the head/neck area within 4 months of the screening visit, or planned Botox treatment during the study;
- Previous or ongoing treatment with an implanted stimulator or other implanted device in the head and/or neck;
- Known pronounced anterior septal deviation, or other known relevant abnormality in the nasal cavity, including bacterial infection and wounds;
- History of relevant sinus surgery, transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary or other lesions or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea;
- Fitted with a pacemaker/defibrillator;
- Previously treated with therapeutic x-ray intervention in the facial region (that could have influenced the nasal mucosa);
- Ongoing upper respiratory infection or malignancy in the nasal cavity;
- History of regular nose bleeding (epistaxis), or concomitant condition or medication that could cause excessive bleeding including treatment with an anticoagulant;
- Head injury or open wound that contraindicates use of the Chordate Headband;
- Known allergy to polyvinylchloride, a material used in the Chordate Catheter, or medicinal liquid paraffin;
- Concurrent condition or risk of non-compliance that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect the interpretation of performance or safety data or which otherwise contraindicates participation in a clinical investigation;
- Pregnant and lactating women;
- Participation in a clinical investigation within 3 months of enrolment or planned participation at any time during this clinical investigation;
- Previous participation in this study;
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chordate Medicallead
- Vinnovacollaborator
- FGK Clinical Research GmbHcollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Terveystalo Ruoholahti
Helsinki, 00180, Finland
Helsingin päänsärkykeskus / Aava Itäkeskus
Helsinki, 00930, Finland
Terveystalo Tampere
Tampere, 33100, Finland
Suomen Terveystalo Turku
Turku, 20100, Finland
Lewis Neurologie
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70178, Germany
Neurologie- & Kopfschmerzzentrum
München, Bavaria, 80802, Germany
Klinikum Großhadern / Neurologische Klinik der Universität München
München, Bavaria, 81377, Germany
Migräne-Klinik Königstein
Königstein im Taunus, Hesse, 61462, Germany
Universitätsmedizin Rostock / Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie
Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 18147, Germany
CTC North am Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20251, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Hoffmann J, Kaube H, Rimmele F, Jurgens TP, Nissila M, Gaul C, Kallela M, Keski-Santti P, Sumelahti ML, Straube A, Lewis D, Hoffmann V, Wirtz L, Rempel A, Bohm O, May A. Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Neurology. 2025 Feb 11;104(3):e210220. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210220. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
PMID: 39787477DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Jan Hermansson
- Organization
- Chordate Medical AB
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arne May, Prof. Dr.
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2018
First Posted
January 17, 2018
Study Start
March 22, 2018
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
August 1, 2022
Last Updated
January 6, 2025
Results First Posted
January 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Due to uncertainties in EU data protection legislation individual deidentified participant data are not shared. The main uncertainty is the concept of what "deidentified" means. It appears not to mean that the data set of a person is simply separated from the person's name. What additional operations have to be done appears to depend on technological capabilities to re-identify the persons associated with the data set. A common perception is that the technological capabilities for re-identification are permanently increasing. This could have the effect that public data sets that are regarded as deidentified now might become re-identifiable data sets in the future. Once this happens, the sponsor is no longer able to make the publication of the data sets un-happen. This could result in punishment by EU data protection authorities. The sponsor wants to avoid this.