Computerized Cognitive Intervention in the Oldest-Old
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Little is known about preventive strategies with immediate public health impact for cognitive functioning in the oldest-old (OO). Cognitive training improves cognitive functioning in the young-old (YO; 60 to 84), yet has not been examined in the OO. Clinical trials are needed to determine if computerized cognitive training is effective at preventing or delaying cognitive decline in the OO. In order to develop such trials, information regarding use of computers and internet by the OO, and the ability and interest in such a program, must be determined. This study will examine the effects of a computerized cognitive training program, CogniFit™, with a "classic" computerized games program, on cognitive functioning in cognitively healthy OO subjects. Information regarding use of computers and internet by the OO will be collected. Interest in and ability to complete a computerized cognitive training program will be examined, along with the cognitive, demographic, biological, and lifestyle characteristics related to this interest and ability. Efficacy of the CogniFit™ and games programs will be assessed immediately following the training and four months after completing the training. The researchers expect that those who use the CogniFit™ program will have greater improvements than those using the games program. Finally, the participants' characteristics related to the efficacy of the programs will be examined. Subjects recruited for this project will include those already participating in several studies of aging and cognition at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Recruiting from this pool of subjects will provide this program with baseline information regarding numerous subject characteristics, including cognition, family history, lifestyle, and cardiovascular information. This study will inform future large-scale clinical trials of computerized cognitive training programs in the elderly, as well as provide information regarding the efficacy of such training in the OO. In addition, the study will identify characteristics affecting efficacy of computerized training, and thus, may suggest mechanisms through which cognitive training improves cognitive functioning in the most senior citizens of our society.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 16, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2018
CompletedJanuary 12, 2018
January 1, 2018
3.8 years
January 5, 2018
January 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Global Cognition Composite
Memory, Immediate recall; Word List Memory, Delayed recall; Word List Memory, Recognition; Logical Memory Story A, Immediate recall; Logical Memory Story A, Delayed recall; Logical Memory Story A, Recognition, Target Cancellation Tests (diamond and TMX); Trail Making Test (Parts A and B); Digit Symbol Substitution Test; Digit Span tests (Forward and Backward), Similarities; Boston Naming Test; and Category Fluency and Letter Fluency tests at completion of program as compared to baseline.
Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Memory Function
Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Logical Memory Story A
Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Attention/Executive function score
Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Change in Language function score
Baseline and after completion of program (approximately 7-8 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Computerized cognitive training
EXPERIMENTALReceived the Computerized cognitive training program, CogniFit™
Control-games
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceived the Computerized games program
Interventions
The program utilizes 21 tasks, which may develop 14 cognitive domains: awareness, inhibition, spatial perception, visual short term memory, working memory, hand-eye coordination, visual scanning, response time, divided attention, time estimation, visual perception, shifting, naming, and planning.
The program utilizes classic computer games, which may develop cognitive domains. Games will be used over 8 weeks. The participants will use the program 3 days a week, with one rest day between each session. Each session lasts approximately 20 minutes. The participant will use the program for a total number of 24 sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 80+
- Normal cognition by consensus conference, MMSE\> 25th percentile norm, CDR=0
- Has computer with internet access that is capable of running the computerized cognitive training program.
- Willing to dedicate the necessary time to the project
You may not qualify if:
- Prior or current participation in another cognitive intervention study
- Medical disease that precludes consistent participation or that affects cognition
- Poor vision
- Poor hearing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Jewish Home Lifecare
New York, New York, 10025, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinia
New York, New York, 10029, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michal Schnaider-Beeri, PhD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants are not told which group they are assigned to, and the investigator (PI) and coordinators completing the cognitive evaluation are not told which group the participants are assigned to.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2018
First Posted
January 12, 2018
Study Start
March 10, 2011
Primary Completion
December 16, 2014
Study Completion
December 16, 2014
Last Updated
January 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01