Pioneering Advances in Care and Education (PACE)
PACE
Development, Validation, and Dissemination of an Integrated Risk Prediction Model and Decision Aid to Discern Aggressive Versus Indolent Prostate Cancer
3 other identifiers
interventional
119
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This clinical trial evaluates the use of novel decision support educational materials and services using health coaches. The study includes men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. A 160 men will be recruited. Half of the men will receive a call from a health coach before their initial consultation visit with their urologist to review their treatment concerns and questions. The other half will receive usual care provided by the urologist, such as educational materials and services provided by the urologist.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedJune 12, 2023
June 1, 2023
2.2 years
November 30, 2017
June 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decision Quality Index (DQI) scores
The DQI measures patient Knowledge, Concordance, and Decision process. For each fact about prostate cancer item, a correct response = 1 point. Missing responses=0 points. Total score is calculated for all patients who complete at least half of the items and scaled from 0-100%, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. Patients rate their goals and concerns on an 11-point importance scale from 0 (not important at all) to 10 (extremely important). These questions + one question about patient's treatment preference can be used to calculate a concordance score. Patients are asked about whether they were offered a choice, how much pros and cons were discussed, and whether the health care provider asked for their preferences. Participants get 1 point for a response of "yes" / "a lot/some.", total points are summed, then divided by total number of items for a decision making process score from 0-100%. Higher scores indicate a more shared decision making process.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) scores
12 months
Decision Self-Efficacy (DSE) Scores
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants assigned to the control arm will receive usual care, including whatever information materials are provided to them by their urologist.
Decision Support Intervention (DSI)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants assigned to the intervention will receive Decision Support Intervention in the form of a decision aid plus health coaching. The decision aid (delivered by internet and as a Portable Document Format (PDF) document) provides participants with a report on options and outcomes as described in the literature; along with more tailored risk information. The tailored risk information will include their estimated risk of harboring more aggressive prostate cancer based on their clinical/pathologic features (i.e., "My Clinical Risk"). The DSI was developed and piloted at UCSF according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (see http://ipdas.ohri.ca/) (IRS# 14-13332), and incorporates tailored risk models developed and validated.
Interventions
A question list (QL) that includes areas of patient concern are created by the health coach for use by the patient and the urologist at their first consultation visit where they discuss the extent of their cancer and consider treatment options. The coach uses the Prostate Cancer SCOPED model to complete a "Prostate Cancer SCOPED Model Form". The SCOPED model uses concepts such as the situation, choices (treatment), objectives (personal goals and priorities), people (involved in supporting a treatment decision), evaluation and decisions (clarifying which choice is best and next steps).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male \>=18 years of age and newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) (within 3-months).
- Documentation of a low-risk PCa diagnosis as evidenced by clinical features of the following criteria:
- PSA test at diagnosis \<=15 ng/ml
- Localized PCa (cT1/T2,N0,M0)
- Biopsy Gleason grade 2-6 OR (or 3+4 AND \<=33% cores are positive for adenocarcinoma)
- \*\*\*A minimum of 10 diagnostic cores taken by a systematic directed approach. Sampling may be obtained by target transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI imaging.
- No treatment yet
- No previous radiation or simultaneous use of androgen deprivation
- Prior use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitor is allowed if they have been stopped for 6 or more months and biopsy performed when patient was not taking the drug
- English language proficient and ability to provide informed consent
- Managing urologist considers them a candidate for active surveillance
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study, including the ability to read and speak English.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants will be ineligible if they:
- have pursued any active therapy for prostate cancer will be excluded;
- are unable to read/speak English; or
- if their managing urologist does NOT deem them as a candidate for active surveillance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, San Franciscolead
- CentraCare Adult & Pediatric Urologycollaborator
- Lancaster Urologycollaborator
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Centercollaborator
- Palo Alto Medical Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Palo Alto, California, 94301, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
CentraCare Clinic Adult & Pediatric Urology
Sartell, Minnesota, 56377, United States
Lancaster Urology
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604-3200, United States
Related Publications (1)
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fruro.2023.1127089/full
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter R Carroll, MD, MPH
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2017
First Posted
January 11, 2018
Study Start
July 19, 2018
Primary Completion
September 30, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
June 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available through a formal data request