NCT03397160

Brief Summary

This clinical trial evaluates the use of novel decision support educational materials and services using health coaches. The study includes men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. A 160 men will be recruited. Half of the men will receive a call from a health coach before their initial consultation visit with their urologist to review their treatment concerns and questions. The other half will receive usual care provided by the urologist, such as educational materials and services provided by the urologist.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
119

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 11, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 19, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 12, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 8, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate cancerTransformative Impact AwardEarly stageActive surveillanceDecision aidCoaching sessionPersonalizedUniversity of California, San Francisco (UCSF)Validation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Decision Quality Index (DQI) scores

    The DQI measures patient Knowledge, Concordance, and Decision process. For each fact about prostate cancer item, a correct response = 1 point. Missing responses=0 points. Total score is calculated for all patients who complete at least half of the items and scaled from 0-100%, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. Patients rate their goals and concerns on an 11-point importance scale from 0 (not important at all) to 10 (extremely important). These questions + one question about patient's treatment preference can be used to calculate a concordance score. Patients are asked about whether they were offered a choice, how much pros and cons were discussed, and whether the health care provider asked for their preferences. Participants get 1 point for a response of "yes" / "a lot/some.", total points are summed, then divided by total number of items for a decision making process score from 0-100%. Higher scores indicate a more shared decision making process.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) scores

    12 months

  • Decision Self-Efficacy (DSE) Scores

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Usual care

NO INTERVENTION

Participants assigned to the control arm will receive usual care, including whatever information materials are provided to them by their urologist.

Decision Support Intervention (DSI)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants assigned to the intervention will receive Decision Support Intervention in the form of a decision aid plus health coaching. The decision aid (delivered by internet and as a Portable Document Format (PDF) document) provides participants with a report on options and outcomes as described in the literature; along with more tailored risk information. The tailored risk information will include their estimated risk of harboring more aggressive prostate cancer based on their clinical/pathologic features (i.e., "My Clinical Risk"). The DSI was developed and piloted at UCSF according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (see http://ipdas.ohri.ca/) (IRS# 14-13332), and incorporates tailored risk models developed and validated.

Behavioral: Decision Support Intervention (DSI)

Interventions

A question list (QL) that includes areas of patient concern are created by the health coach for use by the patient and the urologist at their first consultation visit where they discuss the extent of their cancer and consider treatment options. The coach uses the Prostate Cancer SCOPED model to complete a "Prostate Cancer SCOPED Model Form". The SCOPED model uses concepts such as the situation, choices (treatment), objectives (personal goals and priorities), people (involved in supporting a treatment decision), evaluation and decisions (clarifying which choice is best and next steps).

Also known as: PCa SCOPED model
Decision Support Intervention (DSI)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male \>=18 years of age and newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) (within 3-months).
  • Documentation of a low-risk PCa diagnosis as evidenced by clinical features of the following criteria:
  • PSA test at diagnosis \<=15 ng/ml
  • Localized PCa (cT1/T2,N0,M0)
  • Biopsy Gleason grade 2-6 OR (or 3+4 AND \<=33% cores are positive for adenocarcinoma)
  • \*\*\*A minimum of 10 diagnostic cores taken by a systematic directed approach. Sampling may be obtained by target transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI imaging.
  • No treatment yet
  • No previous radiation or simultaneous use of androgen deprivation
  • Prior use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitor is allowed if they have been stopped for 6 or more months and biopsy performed when patient was not taking the drug
  • English language proficient and ability to provide informed consent
  • Managing urologist considers them a candidate for active surveillance
  • Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study, including the ability to read and speak English.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants will be ineligible if they:
  • have pursued any active therapy for prostate cancer will be excluded;
  • are unable to read/speak English; or
  • if their managing urologist does NOT deem them as a candidate for active surveillance.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Palo Alto Medical Foundation

Palo Alto, California, 94301, United States

Location

University of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94158, United States

Location

CentraCare Clinic Adult & Pediatric Urology

Sartell, Minnesota, 56377, United States

Location

Lancaster Urology

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604-3200, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fruro.2023.1127089/full

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Peter R Carroll, MD, MPH

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This is a site-randomized, cluster-crossover clinical trial of a decision support intervention (DSI) vs. usual care, among men with low prognostic risk prostate cancer, to assess differences in informed decision making (i.e., knowledge), anxiety, and decision quality and self-efficacy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2017

First Posted

January 11, 2018

Study Start

July 19, 2018

Primary Completion

September 30, 2020

Study Completion

September 30, 2020

Last Updated

June 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available through a formal data request

More information

Locations