NCT03395379

Brief Summary

The investigators aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using ambient air to protect against thermal injury during RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) based on data from cases at their institute.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2012

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 11, 2012

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 15, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2016

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 4, 2018

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 10, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

January 4, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

RadiofrequencyThermal ProtectionPercutaneous thermal ablationKidney neoplasms

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Failure rate of the air dissection procedure

    The failure rate of the air dissection procedure is defined as the need for another dissection method, the inability to create sufficient space for successful dissection and/or damage to surrounding vital tissues.

    6 weeks post-operative

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative complications

    6 weeks post-operative

Study Arms (2)

Group 1

RFA without air dissection protection

Procedure: RFA

Group 2

RFA with air dissection protection

Procedure: RFA

Interventions

RFAPROCEDURE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a medical procedure in which part of the electrical conduction system of the tumor is ablated using the heat generated from medium frequency alternating current.

Group 1Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study cohort is selected from our institution. Patients with a single SRM of \<4 cm, confirmed as RCC on biopsy, are offered RFA as an alternative to open resection. In cases in which vital tissues are located within 10 mm of the target treatment area, air dissection are planned if the patient provide his consent.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
  • Patients with a single SRM of \<4 cm, confirmed as RCC on biopsy
  • RCC status : pT1a
  • Eligible patients for an RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have already received a RFA treatment for an other tissu or tumor
  • Patients who have a bleeding tumor or prior local treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C. Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997). Urology. 2000 Jul;56(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00534-3.

    PMID: 10869624BACKGROUND
  • Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, Jones RS. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):865-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.026.

    PMID: 17116555BACKGROUND
  • Boss A, Clasen S, Kuczyk M, Anastasiadis A, Schmidt D, Claussen CD, Schick F, Pereira PL. Thermal damage of the genitofemoral nerve due to radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: a potentially avoidable complication. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Dec;185(6):1627-31. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1946.

    PMID: 16304025BACKGROUND
  • Joniau S, Tsivian M, Gontero P. Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small renal masses: safety and oncologic efficacy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2011 Sep;63(3):227-36.

    PMID: 21993321BACKGROUND
  • Pieper CC, Fischer S, Strunk H, Meyer C, Thomas D, Willinek WA, Hauser S, Nadal J, Schild H, Wilhelm K. Percutaneous CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Solitary Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience. Rofo. 2015 Jul;187(7):577-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399340. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

    PMID: 25962750BACKGROUND
  • Arellano RS, Garcia RG, Gervais DA, Mueller PR. Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: efficacy of organ displacement by injection of 5% dextrose in water into the retroperitoneum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1686-90. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2904.

    PMID: 19933665BACKGROUND
  • Laeseke PF, Sampson LA, Brace CL, Winter TC 3rd, Fine JP, Lee FT Jr. Unintended thermal injuries from radiofrequency ablation: protection with 5% dextrose in water. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5 Suppl):S249-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1240.

    PMID: 16632684BACKGROUND
  • Farrell MA, Charboneau JW, Callstrom MR, Reading CC, Engen DE, Blute ML. Paranephric water instillation: a technique to prevent bowel injury during percutaneous renal radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Nov;181(5):1315-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811315. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14573426BACKGROUND
  • Zlotta AR, Wildschutz T, Raviv G, Peny MO, van Gansbeke D, Noel JC, Schulman CC. Radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation (RITA) is a possible new modality for treatment of renal cancer: ex vivo and in vivo experience. J Endourol. 1997 Aug;11(4):251-8. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.251.

    PMID: 9376843BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2018

First Posted

January 10, 2018

Study Start

January 11, 2012

Primary Completion

March 15, 2016

Study Completion

May 15, 2016

Last Updated

January 10, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Submission at several congress: WCE2016, EAU2017, AUA2017 Publication at the Journal of Urology in December 2017