NCT03393351

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate a theoretically and empirically grounded implementation program designed to foster shared decision-making in routine cancer care. The intervention program consists of several components (e.g. training for health care professionals, patient empowerment strategies) that will be rolled out in three clinics at a comprehensive cancer center in Germany.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,131

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2017

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 5, 2018

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 12, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 4, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

December 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Shared Decision-MakingDecision MakingPatient ParticipationPatient CenterednessHealth Services ResearchImplementation ResearchOncologyStepped Wedge DesignMixed Methods

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in uptake of shared decision-making from the patients' perspective

    Action to employ shared decision-making as measured by the German version of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)

    All clinics: baseline, 8 months, 16 months, 24 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in uptake of shared decision-making from external observers' perspective

    All clinics: baseline, 8 months, 16 months, 24 months

  • Acceptability of shared decision-making from the health care providers' perspective

    All clinics: baseline, 8 months, 16 months, 24 months

  • Readiness for implementing change from the health care professionals' perspective

    All clinics: baseline, 8 months, 16 months, 24 months

  • Appropriateness of shared decision-making from the health care professionals' perspective

    All clinics: baseline, 8 months, 16 months, 24 months

  • Change in penetration of shared decision-making at the clinic level

    baseline, 3 years

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Shared decision-making program

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Shared decision-making program

Usual care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Usual Care

Interventions

The intervention is shared decision-making. The implementation strategy to foster shared decision-making in routine cancer care is a multicomponent implementation program. The implementation program consists of the following components: 1. shared decision-making trainings for health care professionals, 2. individual coaching for physicians, 3. patient activation strategy, 4. provision of patient information material and decision aids, 5. revision of the clinics quality management documents, and 6. critical reflection of current organization of multidisciplinary team meetings. Implementation: after baseline assessment (t0) for clinic 1, after assessment at t1 for clinic 2, after assessment at t2 for clinic 3.

Shared decision-making program

No specific study related intervention. Treatment decisions are made according to current routine practice at the comprehensive cancer center in Germany.

Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosed with neoplasms (ICD 10: C00-D49, excluding D10-D36)
  • admitted for inpatient or outpatient treatment at the participating clinics
  • age \> 18 years
  • German-speaking

You may not qualify if:

  • severe cognitive impairment
  • physician or nurse working at the participating clinics
  • none

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Oncology, II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic

Hamburg, Germany

Location

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Surgical Sciences, Department of Gynecology

Hamburg, Germany

Location

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Head and Neurocenter, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Scholl I, Hahlweg P, Lindig A, Bokemeyer C, Coym A, Hanken H, Muller V, Smeets R, Witzel I, Kriston L, Harter M. Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.

    PMID: 29580249BACKGROUND
  • Hahlweg P, Lindig A, Frerichs W, Zill J, Hanken H, Muller V, Peters MC, Scholl I. Major influencing factors on routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: qualitative process evaluation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09778-w.

  • Scholl I, Hahlweg P, Lindig A, Frerichs W, Zill J, Cords H, Bokemeyer C, Coym A, Schmalfeldt B, Smeets R, Vollkommer T, Witzel I, Harter M, Kriston L. Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2021 Dec 29;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01174-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsPatient Participation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Isabelle Scholl, Dr.

    Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: A stepped wedge design, a variant of the cluster randomized controlled trial feasible to evaluate interventions in routine implementation, will be used. Participating clinics will receive the multifaceted implementation program in a randomized sequence.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Research Group, Prinicipal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2017

First Posted

January 8, 2018

Study Start

March 5, 2018

Primary Completion

September 12, 2020

Study Completion

December 31, 2020

Last Updated

June 4, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations