Identifying and Treating Depression in Hemodialysis Patients
Using Latent Variables and Directly Observed Treatment to Improve the Diagnosis and Management of Depression Among Hemodialysis Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Depression is present in about 20-30% of hemodialysis patients and is associated with morbidity and mortality. However, depression is inadequately diagnosed and treated among dialysis patients. This is due in part to the overlap between depressive symptoms (e.g. appetite change, trouble sleeping, feeling tired) and symptoms related to persistent metabolic derangements in hemodialysis patients (e.g. nausea, nocturnal cramps, feeling washed out after treatment). The overlap between depressive symptoms and dialysis-related complications makes it difficult to diagnose and therefore to treat depression. In addition, prescription of antidepressant medication may increase an already high pill burden and result in poor adherence. Moreover, the evidence base to guide depression treatment among hemodialysis patients is limited. In the investigators' previous work, they developed methods to use latent variables and structural equation modeling to isolate depressive symptoms. Other investigators have demonstrated that directly observed treatment enhances the effectiveness of tuberculosis and HIV treatment. Investigators now propose a cross-sectional study (Phase 1) followed by a single-arm clinical trial (Phase 2) at 17 dialysis facilities. The cross-sectional study will involve assessments of depressive symptoms (using the PHQ-9 screening instrument) as well as dialysis-related complications, anxiety, and quality of life (Quality of Life Questionnaire) in about 1083 patients. Investigators will then use structural equation modeling to develop and validate a hemodialysis-specific PHQ-9 (hdPHQ-9) that will isolate depressive symptoms. The trial will involve 96 patients with confirmed depression who will be assigned to directly observed weekly antidepressant treatment with fluoxetine. The primary outcome of the trial will be remission of depression at 12 weeks. The trial results will also be used to compare the responsiveness of the PHQ-9 and the hdPHQ-9. Investigators anticipate that the hdPHQ-9 will be a valid and responsive instrument that will isolate depressive symptoms in hemodialysis patients and ultimately improve the screening and diagnosis of depression. Investigators also expect that directly observed weekly fluoxetine treatment will be an effective way to manage depression among hemodialysis patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 depression
Started Mar 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_4 depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 17, 2024
CompletedOctober 17, 2024
October 1, 2024
5 years
October 12, 2017
July 10, 2024
October 15, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To Determine the Impact of Directly Observed Weekly Fluoxetine Treatment on Remission of Depression Among Hemodialysis Patients.
remission of depression, defined as a week 12 Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) total score of \<5. The survey consists of 9 questions to gauge depression/depressive symptoms. Each question asks - Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following problems: Each questions 0-3 scale (0=not at all 1= several days 2= more than half the days 3=nearly every day ). Range =0min to 27max. A TOTAL SCORE OF ≥10 IS AN ESTABLISHED THRESHOLD FOR CLINICALLY RELEVANT DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS. Less than 5 is total remission of depressive symptoms.
3 years
Study Arms (1)
Fluoxetine Group
EXPERIMENTALApproximately 96 patients will be enrolled into the intervention (Phase II) over the duration of the entire study.
Interventions
Patients enrolled into Phase II will be prescribed 2 weeks of short-acting fluoxetine 20 mg and will be instructed to take the prescription daily for 2 weeks. Then patients will be prescribed 10 additional weeks of 90 mg (weekly) fluoxetine and will be observed taking it once weekly at the dialysis unit. At the end of the 12 week study period, participants will be provided 4 additional weeks of 90 mg fluoxetine in order to provide sufficient time to follow up with their primary care physician or nephrologist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- currently on hemodialysis at a CDC dialysis unit
- English speaking
- able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- on hemodialysis for less than 3 months
- comorbid psychotic, bipolar, substance use dependence, Alzheimer's or dementia
- Not eligible for Phase II (intervention) if currently on antidepressant medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Related Publications (10)
Cohen SD, Norris L, Acquaviva K, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL. Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of depression in patients with end-stage renal disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Nov;2(6):1332-42. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03951106. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
PMID: 17942763BACKGROUNDHedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Kuchibhatla M, Kimmel PL, Szczech LA. The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006 May;69(9):1662-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000308.
PMID: 16598203BACKGROUNDWatnick S, Wang PL, Demadura T, Ganzini L. Validation of 2 depression screening tools in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Nov;46(5):919-24. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.006.
PMID: 16253733BACKGROUNDCohen SD, Kimmel PL. Nutritional status, psychological issues and survival in hemodialysis patients. Contrib Nephrol. 2007;155:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000100952.
PMID: 17369709BACKGROUNDKimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, Simmens SJ, Alleyne S, Cruz I, Veis JH. Multiple measurements of depression predict mortality in a longitudinal study of chronic hemodialysis outpatients. Kidney Int. 2000 May;57(5):2093-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00059.x.
PMID: 10792629BACKGROUNDKimmel PL, Peterson RA, Weihs KL, Simmens SJ, Boyle DH, Verme D, Umana WO, Veis JH, Alleyne S, Cruz I. Behavioral compliance with dialysis prescription in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995 Apr;5(10):1826-34. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V5101826.
PMID: 7787151BACKGROUNDLacson E Jr, Bruce L, Li NC, Mooney A, Maddux FW. Depressive affect and hospitalization risk in incident hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):1713-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01340214. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
PMID: 25278546BACKGROUNDLopes AA, Albert JM, Young EW, Satayathum S, Pisoni RL, Andreucci VE, Mapes DL, Mason NA, Fukuhara S, Wikstrom B, Saito A, Port FK. Screening for depression in hemodialysis patients: associations with diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2004 Nov;66(5):2047-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00977.x.
PMID: 15496178BACKGROUNDChiu YW, Teitelbaum I, Misra M, de Leon EM, Adzize T, Mehrotra R. Pill burden, adherence, hyperphosphatemia, and quality of life in maintenance dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jun;4(6):1089-96. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00290109. Epub 2009 May 7.
PMID: 19423571BACKGROUNDKauffman KM, Dolata J, Figueroa M, Gunzler D, Huml A, Pencak J, Sajatovic M, Sehgal AR. Directly Observed Weekly Fluoxetine for Major Depressive Disorder Among Hemodialysis Patients: A Single-Arm Feasibility Trial. Kidney Med. 2022 Jan 17;4(3):100413. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100413. eCollection 2022 Mar.
PMID: 35386606DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study sample size is small for multiple reasons, including more patients than anticipated scoring below the threshold on the PHQ-9 or already being on psychiatric medications before enrollment. conditions. There was no comparison group. As a result, we are unable to compare efficacy and safety with other treatments or to evaluate the potentially confounding effect of frequent interactions with the psychiatric nurse practitioner.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ashwini Sehgal
- Organization
- MetroHealth System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ash Seghal, MD
MetroHealth Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2017
First Posted
January 5, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 28, 2023
Study Completion
February 28, 2023
Last Updated
October 17, 2024
Results First Posted
October 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share