Pre-operative Aqueous Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Open Fractures
Aqueous-PREP
Aqueous-PREP: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-operative Aqueous Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Open Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
1,638
3 countries
15
Brief Summary
The prevention of infection is the single most important goal influencing peri-operative care of patients with open fractures. Standard practice in the management of open fractures includes sterile technique and pre-operative skin preparation with an antiseptic solution. The available solutions kill bacteria and decrease the quantity of native skin flora, thereby decreasing surgical site infection (SSI). While there is extensive guidance on specific procedures for prophylactic antibiotic use and standards for sterile technique, the evidence regarding the choice of antiseptic skin preparation solution is very limited for open fracture surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Apr 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_4
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 19, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 27, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 31, 2023
CompletedMarch 31, 2023
March 1, 2023
3.5 years
December 20, 2017
November 15, 2022
March 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With a Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network reporting criteria (2017): Date of event for infection may occur from the date of fracture to 30 days after the definitive fracture management surgery; AND involves only skin and subcutaneous tissue of the incision; AND patient has at least one of the following: 1. purulent drainage from the superficial incision. 2. organisms identified from an aseptically obtained specimen from the superficial incision or subcutaneous tissue by a culture or non-culture based microbiologic testing method which is performed for purposes of clinical diagnosis or treatment 3. superficial incision that is deliberately opened by a surgeon, and culture or non-culture-based testing is not performed. AND patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: pain or tenderness; localized swelling; erythema; or heat. 4. diagnosis of a superficial incisional SSI by the surgeon.
Within 30 days of the patient's last planned fracture management surgery
Number of Participants With a Deep Incisional or Organ/Space Infection
Guided by CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network Surgical Site Infection reporting criteria (2017): Deep Incisional Infection: Occurs within 90 days post definitive fracture management; \& involves fascial/muscle layers; \& has at least one of the following: 1. deep incision purulent drainage 2. a deep incision that dehisces, or is opened by a surgeon, and organism is identified by microbiologic testing; or microbiologic testing is not performed \& has at least one of the following: fever (\> 38 °C); localized pain or tenderness 3. other evidence of deep incision infection on anatomical exam or imaging test Organ/Space Infection: Occurs within 90 days post definitive fracture management; \& involves any part of the body deeper than the fascial/muscle layers; \& has at least one of the following: 1. organ/space purulent drainage 2. organisms in organ/space identified by microbiologic testing 3. other evidence of organ/space infection on anatomical exam or imaging test
Within 90 days of the patient's last planned fracture management surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With an Unplanned Fracture-Related Reoperation
Within 12 months of the patient's last planned operation
Study Arms (2)
10% povidone-iodine (1% free iodine) in purified water
EXPERIMENTALThe povidone-iodine solution will contain 10% povidone-iodine (1% free iodine) in purified water as the only active ingredient. Operating room personnel will apply the solution to the operative site as the final preoperative skin antisepsis preparation immediately prior to commencing surgical fixation. They will apply the solution as per manufacturer's directions for use (e.g., technique of application, duration of application, drying time, drying techniques, replacement of draping, etc.).
4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in purified water
EXPERIMENTALThe CHG solution will contain 4% CHG in purified water as the only active ingredient. Operating room personnel will apply the solution to the operative site as the final preoperative skin antisepsis preparation immediately prior to commencing surgical fixation. They will apply the solution as per manufacturer's directions (e.g., technique of application, duration of application, drying time, replacement of draping, etc.).
Interventions
Participant recruitment will begin with the clinical sites using their assigned pre-operative antiseptic skin solution for all open fracture surgeries for a two-month period.
Once the first intervention phase is completed, each site will crossover to the opposite study solution. Each site will need to develop local procedures to ensure a successful crossover. They will use the second solution for all open fracture surgeries for a two-month period, and will then crossover back to the solution in the first intervention phase.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18 years of age or older.
- Open fracture of the appendicular skeleton.
- Received or will receive definitive fracture treatment with a surgical implant(s) (e.g., internal fixation, external fixation, joint prosthesis, etc.).
- Open fracture wound management that includes formal surgical debridement within 72 hours of their injury.
- Will have all planned fracture care surgeries performed by a participating surgeon or delegate.
- Informed consent obtained.
- Patient enrolled within 3 weeks of their fracture.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients that did not or will not receive the allocated pre-operative surgical preparation solution due to a medical contraindication.
- Received previous surgical debridement or management of their open fracture at a non-participating hospital or clinic.
- Open fracture managed outside of the participating orthopaedic service (e.g., hand fracture managed by plastic surgeon).
- Chronic or acute infection at or near the fracture site at the time of initial fracture surgery.
- Burns at the fracture site.
- Incarceration.
- Expected injury survival of less than 90 days.
- Terminal illness with expected survival less than 90 days.
- Previous enrollment in a PREP-IT trial.
- Currently enrolled in a study that does not permit co-enrollment.
- Unable to obtain informed consent due to language barriers.
- Likely problems, in the judgment of study personnel, with maintaining follow-up with the patient.
- Excluded due to sampling strategy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Maryland, Baltimorelead
- McMaster Universitycollaborator
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
Study Sites (15)
The CORE Institute / Banner University Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Wright State University / Miami Valley Hospital
Dayton, Ohio, 45409, United States
Greenville Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37240, United States
San Antonio Military Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234, United States
McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Science Center Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2, Canada
McMaster University, Center for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 8E7, Canada
Hospital Parc Tauli de Sabadell
Barcelona, Spain
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
Barcelona, Spain
Related Publications (5)
O'Hara NN, Heels-Ansdell D, Bzovsky S, Dodds S, Thabane L, Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Devereaux PJ, Slobogean GP, Sprague S; PREP-IT Investigators. A pragmatic randomized trial evaluating pre-operative aqueous antiseptic skin solutions in open fractures (Aqueous-PREP): statistical analysis plan. Trials. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06541-0.
PMID: 36096826BACKGROUNDPREP-IT Investigators. Aqueous skin antisepsis before surgical fixation of open fractures (Aqueous-PREP): a multiple-period, cluster-randomised, crossover trial. Lancet. 2022 Oct 15;400(10360):1334-1344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01652-X.
PMID: 36244384DERIVEDSprague S, Guyatt P, Bzovsky S, Nguyen U, Bhandari M, Thabane L, Petrisor B, Johal HS, Leonard J, Dodds S, Mossuto F, O'Toole RV, Howe A, Demyanovich HK, Camara M, O'Hara NN, Slobogean GP; PREP-IT Investigators. Pragmatic randomized trial evaluating pre-operative aqueous antiseptic skin solution in open fractures (Aqueous-PREP): the feasibility of a cluster randomized crossover study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00800-8.
PMID: 33648577DERIVEDSprague S, Scott T, Dodds S, Pogorzelski D, McKay P, Harris AD, Wood A, Thabane L, Bhandari M, Mehta S, Gaski G, Boulton C, Marcano-Fernandez F, Guerra-Farfan E, Hebden J, O'Hara LM, Slobogean GP; PREP-IT Investigators. Cluster identification, selection, and description in cluster randomized crossover trials: the PREP-IT trials. Trials. 2020 Aug 12;21(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04611-9.
PMID: 32787892DERIVEDProgram of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREP-IT) Investigators; Slobogean GP, Sprague S, Wells J, Bhandari M, Rojas A, Garibaldi A, Wood A, Howe A, Harris AD, Petrisor BA, Mullins DC, Pogorzelski D, Marvel D, Heels-Ansdell D, Mossuto F, Grissom F, Del Fabbro G, Guyatt GH, Della Rocca GJ, Demyanovich HK, Gitajn IL, Palmer J, D'Alleyrand JC, Friedrich J, Rivera J, Hebden J, Rudnicki J, Fowler J, Jeray KJ, Thabane L, Marchand L, O'Hara LM, Joshi MG, Talbot M, Camara M, Szasz OP, O'Hara NN, McKay P, Devereaux PJ, O'Toole RV, Zura R, Morshed S, Dodds S, Li S, Tanner SL, Scott T, Nguyen U. Effectiveness of Iodophor vs Chlorhexidine Solutions for Surgical Site Infections and Unplanned Reoperations for Patients Who Underwent Fracture Repair: The PREP-IT Master Protocol. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2215.
PMID: 32259266DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The uncontrolled use of adjunctive skin preparations before final antisepsis is a potential limitation of our study design. Although the use of a prewash with adjunctive alcohol was similarly distributed between the treatment groups, post-randomization confounding from this practice might exist. The trial has other limitations, including unmasked treatment allocation and the decision to initiate each recruitment site as soon as possible.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Research Administrator
- Organization
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gerard Slobogean, MD
University of Maryland, Baltimore
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheila Sprague, PhD
McMaster University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohit Bhandari, MD
McMaster University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The orthopaedic team (including the study coordinators) cannot be blinded to the treatment allocation as the antiseptic solutions are visually distinguishable and these individuals need to lead the implementation of the cluster-crossover protocol at their clinical site. The Adjudication Committee Members and data analysts will be blinded to the study treatment. All interpretation of study results will initially be done in a blinded manner by developing two interpretations of the results. One interpretation will assume treatment A is povidone-iodine, the other interpretation will assume it is CHG. Once the data interpretations for each assumption are finalized, the data will be unblinded and the correct interpretation will be accepted.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2017
First Posted
December 28, 2017
Study Start
April 8, 2018
Primary Completion
October 19, 2021
Study Completion
June 27, 2022
Last Updated
March 31, 2023
Results First Posted
March 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share