NCT03384927

Brief Summary

  1. 1.Assessing whether the treatment diary can help optimize the overall treatment of patients.
  2. 2.To assess whether the patient finds the treatment diary useful and worth spending time on. Also if the patient finds it easier to evaluate the treatment and, if necessary, set new goals.
  3. 3.To assess whether the patient's quality of life is increased by the use of the treatment diary.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 11, 2017

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2017

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 28, 2017

Completed
8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 23, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8.1 years

First QC Date

December 20, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Treatment diary

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient becomes more satisfied with their treatment using the treatment diary

    To assess if the patient becomes more satisfied with their treatment using the treatment diary. This is assessed by a change in the score on the treatment assessment questionnaire (Questionnaire 1).

    October 2019

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To assess if the patient's quality of life is improved using the treatment diary.

    October 2019

  • The patients' assessment of the treatment diary will be described (Questionnaire 3).

    October 2019

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with muscle overactivity / spasticity independent of the cause and who are being followed as outpatients in the Spasticity Clinic, Neurological Clinic, Rigshospitalet Glostrup.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients where changes are planned regarding their treatment for muscle overactivity during the study period.
  • Patients where the disease is not stable and where it may have a major influence on the treatment effect of botulinum toxin treatment during the study period and where it can be difficult to set SMART (Specific, Measurable, Accepted, Realistic, Timed) goals.
  • Patients who have previously been treated and have used a treatment diary in connection with the botulinum toxin treatment.
  • Patients who can not collaborate on completing goals and evaluating treatment effect due to language or cognitive problems.
  • Patients who at the same time are being treated with botulinum toxin in the bladder.
  • If significant changes occur in the patient's health, which may involve new cancer, stroke, multiple sclerosis attack, etc. during the study period, the participant will be withdrawn from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spasticity Clinic, Neurological Clinic, Rigshospitalet Glostrup

Glostrup Municipality, 2600, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscle Spasticity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Bo BS Biering-Soerensen, Doctor

    Spasticity Clinic, Rigshospitalet Glostrup

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CROSSOVER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor, Head of Clinic for spasticity

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2017

First Posted

December 28, 2017

Study Start

December 11, 2017

Primary Completion

December 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

April 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations