NCT03384199

Brief Summary

Gold markers implanted in the prostate are used frequently for position verification of the prostate during external-beam radiotherapy. By using the markers as a surrogate for the prostate itself, not only set-up errors, but also the internal motion of the prostate relative to the bony anatomy can be identified. It is thus believed that escalated dose marker guided radiotherapy should result in better biochemical control compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy, with a similar or lower incidence of toxicity. However, clinical data to support this is still limited. The purpose of this study is to directly compare late toxicity as well as biochemical control between patients treated with dose escalated marker guided radiotherapy versus conventional dose non-marker guided radiotherapy who has otherwise been treated with similar radiotherapy planning techniques and equipment. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging has undergone several technical improvements and shows promises for prostate tumor detection and localization. In addition to morphological information, magnetic resonance imaging allows an estimation of physiological properties of tissues. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive to restriction of diffusion of water molecules, and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can analyze tissue micro vascular properties. Multi para metric magnetic resonance imaging combining Diffusion-weighted and Dynamic contrast enhanced has demonstrated its value in distinguishing malignant from benign prostate tissue. Higher radiation dose levels were consistently associated with improved biochemical control outcomes and reduction in distant metastases. Radiation dose was one of the important predictors of long-term biochemical tumor control. Dose levels \< 70.2 Grey and 70.2-79.2 Grey were associated with 2.3 and 1.3-fold increased risks of pro static specific antigen relapse compared with higher doses. However, further dose escalation to the whole gland is limited due to an unacceptable high risk of acute and late toxicity. Moreover, local recurrences often originate at the location of the macroscopic tumor, so boosting the radiation dose at the macroscopic tumor within the prostate might increase local control. A reduction of distant metastases and improved survival can be expected by reducing local failure. Treating the dominant focus or boosting the dose to this area while reducing the dose to as much healthy tissue as possible has significant potential for improving treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 27, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

August 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Localized ProstateVMATDose escalationFiducial markerFocal LesionRandom error during dose escalation radiotherapyfiducial marker image guided technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measurement of systemic error in mm and random error in cm in the different three direction X-Y-Z

    Position verification will be done guided with implanted gold markers with daily portal imaging (AP \& lateral) correction protocol in mediolateral, superior-inferior \& inward-outward directions by mm for 35 fraction. The off-line portal pre-correction images will be verified daily to detect average shifts in the three diresctions. Random or inter-fraction errors which are deviations between different fractions will be taken weekly during a treatment series. Systematic errors Which are deviations between the planned patient position and the average patient position of a course of fractioned therapy will be taken in the first three settings. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the systematic error and SD of random errors will be analyzed.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Biochemical relapse of PSA above normal level 4 ng/dl

    12 months

  • subjective toxicity assessment

    12 months

  • Objective toxicity assessment

    12 months

Study Arms (1)

Dose escaltion

EXPERIMENTAL

insertion of 3 fiducial markers, prostate will receive 78 Gy with dose escalation to prostate focal lesion up to 87 Gy

Radiation: Dose escalation to prostate focal lesion

Interventions

For each patient the radio-opaque marker (used for treatment verification) will be inserted by ultrasound guidance \& local anaesthetic with an 17ga x 30cm brachytherapy needle that has 1.2mm x 3mm one gold marker. The ultrasound probe (as used for transrectal biopsy) will be introduced rectally with the patient in the left lateral position. After measuring the volume of the prostate and determining the desired position (preferably in the corpus of prostate), three gold markers will be inserted as follows: one into right side, one into left side of the base and the third in the apex of the prostate

Dose escaltion

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Performance status ECOG: 0-2
  • Pathologically proven prostatic adenocarcinoma.
  • Localized prostate cancer (Gleason's score: 2-10, Baseline serum prostatic antigen: \>4 ng/dl, T1a-T3b).
  • No extra prostatic invading adjacent structures.
  • Adequate hematological, renal \& hepatic profile.
  • Insertion of more than one fiducial marker in the prostate.
  • Patient did verbal \& written consent and adherence to treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient weight \>130 kg.
  • Performance status EGOG: 3-4.
  • Distant metastasis.
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy.
  • Previous prostatectomy.
  • Urinary bladder stones.
  • General contraindications for MRI (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, metal implants or history of severe allergic reaction after administration of contrast agent).
  • Concomitant neoplastic disease or previous anti neoplastic therapy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Radwa Fawzy Saleh Ahmed

Cairo, Maadi, 11728, Egypt

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: VMAT dose escalation protocol with image guided fiducial markers
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant Lecturer of Clinical Oncology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2016

First Posted

December 27, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

April 1, 2018

Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Abstract and paper publication

Locations