Dose Escalation Using Fiducial Markers in Image Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy to the Focal Lesion Micro Boost of Localized Prostate Cancer
The Impact of Dose Escalation Using Gold Markers in Image Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy to the Focal Lesion Micro Boost of Localized Prostate Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gold markers implanted in the prostate are used frequently for position verification of the prostate during external-beam radiotherapy. By using the markers as a surrogate for the prostate itself, not only set-up errors, but also the internal motion of the prostate relative to the bony anatomy can be identified. It is thus believed that escalated dose marker guided radiotherapy should result in better biochemical control compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy, with a similar or lower incidence of toxicity. However, clinical data to support this is still limited. The purpose of this study is to directly compare late toxicity as well as biochemical control between patients treated with dose escalated marker guided radiotherapy versus conventional dose non-marker guided radiotherapy who has otherwise been treated with similar radiotherapy planning techniques and equipment. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging has undergone several technical improvements and shows promises for prostate tumor detection and localization. In addition to morphological information, magnetic resonance imaging allows an estimation of physiological properties of tissues. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive to restriction of diffusion of water molecules, and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can analyze tissue micro vascular properties. Multi para metric magnetic resonance imaging combining Diffusion-weighted and Dynamic contrast enhanced has demonstrated its value in distinguishing malignant from benign prostate tissue. Higher radiation dose levels were consistently associated with improved biochemical control outcomes and reduction in distant metastases. Radiation dose was one of the important predictors of long-term biochemical tumor control. Dose levels \< 70.2 Grey and 70.2-79.2 Grey were associated with 2.3 and 1.3-fold increased risks of pro static specific antigen relapse compared with higher doses. However, further dose escalation to the whole gland is limited due to an unacceptable high risk of acute and late toxicity. Moreover, local recurrences often originate at the location of the macroscopic tumor, so boosting the radiation dose at the macroscopic tumor within the prostate might increase local control. A reduction of distant metastases and improved survival can be expected by reducing local failure. Treating the dominant focus or boosting the dose to this area while reducing the dose to as much healthy tissue as possible has significant potential for improving treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 14, 2019
August 1, 2019
1.6 years
August 21, 2016
August 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of systemic error in mm and random error in cm in the different three direction X-Y-Z
Position verification will be done guided with implanted gold markers with daily portal imaging (AP \& lateral) correction protocol in mediolateral, superior-inferior \& inward-outward directions by mm for 35 fraction. The off-line portal pre-correction images will be verified daily to detect average shifts in the three diresctions. Random or inter-fraction errors which are deviations between different fractions will be taken weekly during a treatment series. Systematic errors Which are deviations between the planned patient position and the average patient position of a course of fractioned therapy will be taken in the first three settings. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the systematic error and SD of random errors will be analyzed.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Biochemical relapse of PSA above normal level 4 ng/dl
12 months
subjective toxicity assessment
12 months
Objective toxicity assessment
12 months
Study Arms (1)
Dose escaltion
EXPERIMENTALinsertion of 3 fiducial markers, prostate will receive 78 Gy with dose escalation to prostate focal lesion up to 87 Gy
Interventions
For each patient the radio-opaque marker (used for treatment verification) will be inserted by ultrasound guidance \& local anaesthetic with an 17ga x 30cm brachytherapy needle that has 1.2mm x 3mm one gold marker. The ultrasound probe (as used for transrectal biopsy) will be introduced rectally with the patient in the left lateral position. After measuring the volume of the prostate and determining the desired position (preferably in the corpus of prostate), three gold markers will be inserted as follows: one into right side, one into left side of the base and the third in the apex of the prostate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Performance status ECOG: 0-2
- Pathologically proven prostatic adenocarcinoma.
- Localized prostate cancer (Gleason's score: 2-10, Baseline serum prostatic antigen: \>4 ng/dl, T1a-T3b).
- No extra prostatic invading adjacent structures.
- Adequate hematological, renal \& hepatic profile.
- Insertion of more than one fiducial marker in the prostate.
- Patient did verbal \& written consent and adherence to treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient weight \>130 kg.
- Performance status EGOG: 3-4.
- Distant metastasis.
- Previous pelvic radiotherapy.
- Previous prostatectomy.
- Urinary bladder stones.
- General contraindications for MRI (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, metal implants or history of severe allergic reaction after administration of contrast agent).
- Concomitant neoplastic disease or previous anti neoplastic therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Radwa Fawzy Saleh Ahmed
Cairo, Maadi, 11728, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant Lecturer of Clinical Oncology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2016
First Posted
December 27, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Abstract and paper publication