Comparative Trial Via Tranforaminal Approach Versus Epidural Catheter Via Interlaminar Approach
A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial of Targeted Injection Via a Transforaminal Approach With Dexamethasone Versus an Epidural Catheter Via an Interlaminar Approach With Particulate Steroid for the Treatment of Cervical Radicular Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Do cervical epidural steroid injections done by transforaminal catheter targeted approach improve pain and function in patients with cervical radicular pain?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2017
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 19, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 22, 2021
CompletedNovember 25, 2022
November 1, 2022
2.6 years
December 4, 2017
August 19, 2020
November 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Percentage of Participants With Reduction of 50% or More of Neck and Arm Pain NRS Score
The Percentage of Participants with Reduction of 50% or More of Neck and Arm Pain NRS score
1 month follow up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Neck Disability Index-5
1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year follow up
Percentage of Participants Reporting >6.8 Reduction on the Medication Quantification Scale III
1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year follow up
The Percentage of Participants Reporting Patient Global Impression of Change Score of 6-7 (Indicating "Much Improved" and "Very Much Improved")
1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year follow up
Study Arms (2)
Transforaminal ESI with dexamethasone
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1: Transforaminal cervical ESI with dexamethasone sodium phosphate
Transforaminal catheter-targeted ESI with triamcinolone
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2: Catheter-targeted cervical ESI with triamcinolone acetonide
Interventions
Catheter-targeted ESI via interlaminar access at the C7-T1 level with dexamethasone sodium phosphate 1.5 mL (10 mg/mL) and 1 ml 1% lidocaine (total volume 2.5 mL).
Catheter-targeted ESI via interlaminar access at the C7-T1 level with triamcinolone acetonide 2 mL (40mg/mL) and 1 ml 1% lidocaine (total volume 3 mL).
Transforaminal ESI with dexamethasone 1.5 mL of dexamethasone sodium phosphate in group #1
1 mL of 1% lidocaine as diluent for the steroid in both group #1 and group #2
Transforaminal catheter-targeted ESI with triamcinolone acetonide 2 mL in group #2
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-80.
- Clinical diagnosis of unilateral C4-C8 radicular pain.
- Magnetic resonance imaging pathology consistent with clinical symptoms/signs.
- Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score of 4 or higher.
- Pain duration of more than 6 weeks despite trial of conservative therapy (medications, physical therapy, or chiropractic care).
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate, provide consent, or provide follow-up information for the 6-month duration of the study.
- Contraindications to Cervical Epidural Steroid Iinjection (CESI) (active infection, bleeding disorders, current anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication use, allergy to medications used for Cervical epidural steroid injection (CESI), and pregnancy).
- Cervical spinal cord lesions; cerebrovascular, demyelinating, or other neuro-muscular muscular disease.
- Current glucocorticoid use or Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) within past 6 months.
- Prior cervical spine surgery.
- Patient request for or requirement of conscious sedation for the injection procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Utahlead
- Epimedcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah Orthopaedic Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
Related Publications (29)
Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994 Apr;117 ( Pt 2):325-35. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.2.325.
PMID: 8186959BACKGROUNDCarette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):392-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp043887. No abstract available.
PMID: 16049211BACKGROUNDHeckmann JG, Lang CJ, Zobelein I, Laumer R, Druschky A, Neundorfer B. Herniated cervical intervertebral discs with radiculopathy: an outcome study of conservatively or surgically treated patients. J Spinal Disord. 1999 Oct;12(5):396-401.
PMID: 10549703BACKGROUNDJohnston MM, Jordan SE, Charles AC. Pain referral patterns of the C1 to C3 nerves: implications for headache disorders. Ann Neurol. 2013 Jul;74(1):145-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.23869. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
PMID: 23424170BACKGROUNDMizutamari M, Sei A, Tokiyoshi A, Fujimoto T, Taniwaki T, Togami W, Mizuta H. Corresponding scapular pain with the nerve root involved in cervical radiculopathy. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010 Dec;18(3):356-60. doi: 10.1177/230949901001800320.
PMID: 21187551BACKGROUNDRhee JM, Yoon T, Riew KD. Cervical radiculopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Aug;15(8):486-94. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200708000-00005.
PMID: 17664368BACKGROUNDMalanga GA. The diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Jul;29(7 Suppl):S236-45. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199707001-00006.
PMID: 9247921BACKGROUNDRenfrew DL, Moore TE, Kathol MH, el-Khoury GY, Lemke JH, Walker CW. Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Sep-Oct;12(5):1003-7.
PMID: 1719788BACKGROUNDMehta M, Salmon N. Extradural block. Confirmation of the injection site by X-ray monitoring. Anaesthesia. 1985 Oct;40(10):1009-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10558.x.
PMID: 4061788BACKGROUNDStojanovic MP, Vu TN, Caneris O, Slezak J, Cohen SP, Sang CN. The role of fluoroscopy in cervical epidural steroid injections: an analysis of contrast dispersal patterns. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):509-14. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00011.
PMID: 11880836BACKGROUNDVan Zundert J, Huntoon M, Patijn J, Lataster A, Mekhail N, van Kleef M; Pain Practice. 4. Cervical radicular pain. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00319.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
PMID: 19807874BACKGROUNDJohansson A, Hao J, Sjolund B. Local corticosteroid application blocks transmission in normal nociceptive C-fibres. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990 Jul;34(5):335-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03097.x.
PMID: 2167604BACKGROUNDBenyamin RM, Singh V, Parr AT, Conn A, Diwan S, Abdi S. Systematic review of the effectiveness of cervical epidurals in the management of chronic neck pain. Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):137-57.
PMID: 19165300BACKGROUNDStav A, Ovadia L, Sternberg A, Kaadan M, Weksler N. Cervical epidural steroid injection for cervicobrachialgia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 Aug;37(6):562-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03765.x.
PMID: 8213020BACKGROUNDCastagnera L, Maurette P, Pointillart V, Vital JM, Erny P, Senegas J. Long-term results of cervical epidural steroid injection with and without morphine in chronic cervical radicular pain. Pain. 1994 Aug;58(2):239-243. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90204-6.
PMID: 7816491BACKGROUNDSaal JS, Saal JA, Yurth EF. Nonoperative management of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Aug 15;21(16):1877-83. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199608150-00008.
PMID: 8875719BACKGROUNDRiew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Lauryssen C, Goette K. The effect of nerve-root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1589-93. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200011000-00012.
PMID: 11097449BACKGROUNDButtermann GR. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):670-9.
PMID: 15069129BACKGROUNDHuntoon MA. Anatomy of the cervical intervertebral foramina: vulnerable arteries and ischemic neurologic injuries after transforaminal epidural injections. Pain. 2005 Sep;117(1-2):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.030.
PMID: 16055268BACKGROUNDAbbasi A, Malhotra G, Malanga G, Elovic EP, Kahn S. Complications of interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injections: a review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):2144-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a360.
PMID: 17762818BACKGROUNDRathmell JP, Benzon HT, Dreyfuss P, Huntoon M, Wallace M, Baker R, Riew KD, Rosenquist RW, Aprill C, Rost NS, Buvanendran A, Kreiner DS, Bogduk N, Fourney DR, Fraifeld E, Horn S, Stone J, Vorenkamp K, Lawler G, Summers J, Kloth D, O'Brien D Jr, Tutton S. Safeguards to prevent neurologic complications after epidural steroid injections: consensus opinions from a multidisciplinary working group and national organizations. Anesthesiology. 2015 May;122(5):974-84. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000614.
PMID: 25668411BACKGROUNDMcCormick ZL, Nelson A, Bhave M, Zhukalin M, Kendall M, McCarthy RJ, Khan D, Nagpal G, Walega DR. A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial of Targeted Steroid Injection Via Epidural Catheter Versus Standard C7-T1 Interlaminar Approach for the Treatment of Unilateral Cervical Radicular Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;42(1):82-89. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000521.
PMID: 27922950BACKGROUNDAckerman WE 3rd, Ahmad M. The efficacy of lumbar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar disc herniations. Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1217-22, tables of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000260307.16555.7f.
PMID: 17456677BACKGROUNDGharibo CG, Varlotta GP, Rhame EE, Liu EC, Bendo JA, Perloff MD. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroids for the treatment of subacute lumbar radicular pain: a randomized, blinded, prospective outcome study. Pain Physician. 2011 Nov-Dec;14(6):499-511.
PMID: 22086091BACKGROUNDSchaufele MK, Hatch L, Jones W. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar intervertebral disc herniations. Pain Physician. 2006 Oct;9(4):361-6.
PMID: 17066121BACKGROUNDDeyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, Carrino J, Chou R, Cook K, DeLitto A, Goertz C, Khalsa P, Loeser J, Mackey S, Panagis J, Rainville J, Tosteson T, Turk D, Von Korff M, Weiner DK. Focus article: report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain. Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2028-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3540-3.
PMID: 25212440BACKGROUNDDworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Sampaio C. Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.019.
PMID: 19836888BACKGROUNDKovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Tomas M, Mir MA, Cano A, Muriel A, Zamora J, Del Real MT, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N; Spanish Back Pain Research Network. Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Apr 10;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-43.
PMID: 18402665BACKGROUNDGallizzi M, Gagnon C, Harden RN, Stanos S, Khan A. Medication Quantification Scale Version III: internal validation of detriment weights using a chronic pain population. Pain Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00163.x.
PMID: 18211588BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Zachary McCormick
- Organization
- University of Utah, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zachary L McCormick, MD
University of Utah
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Each subject will be randomized into a group assignment in a 1:1 manner, #1 or #2, as outlined in the Methods section
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Zachary L. McCormick, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2017
First Posted
December 26, 2017
Study Start
September 15, 2017
Primary Completion
April 15, 2020
Study Completion
August 19, 2020
Last Updated
November 25, 2022
Results First Posted
March 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2022-11