Different Radiation Dose of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma
Neo-DRATEC
1 other identifier
interventional
147
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, while more than half new cases and deaths occurred in China. Surgery is the main curative treatment for this disease, the 5-year survival of EC remains poor, since most diseases are diagnosed at advanced stages. In last decades, several large clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery can significantly increase the overall survival of patients with EC compared with surgery alone, while no effect of nCRT was apparent on postoperative health-related quality of life . However, the optimal radiation dose and surgery timing are still unknown. The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive higher dose (50.4Gy/28F) of neoadjuvant chemoradiation will have better pathologic response and progress-free survival compared to lower dose (41.4Gy/23F) of chemoradiation followed by surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2023
CompletedNovember 18, 2024
March 1, 2022
3 years
December 18, 2017
November 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression free survival
Time from randomization to tumor progression or any deaths
2 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
R0 resection rate in each arm
analysis is completed 4 weeks after surgery
Complete pathological response rate
analysis is completed 4 weeks after surgery
Postoperative complications in each study arm
30 and 90 days after surgery
Treatment failure pattern
2 year
Overall survival
5 year
Study Arms (2)
Higher dose (50.4Gy/28F) of neoadjuvant chemoradiation
ACTIVE COMPARATORNeoadjuvant chemoradiation: RT: 50.4Gy/28F/5.6W; CT: paclitaxel 50mg/m2 d1, qw + CBP AUC2 d1, qw, weekly for 6 wks; Surgery: 4-6 weeks after nCRT
Lower dose (41.4Gy/23F) of neoadjuvant chemoradiation
ACTIVE COMPARATORNeoadjuvant chemoradiation: RT: 41.4Gy/23F/4.6W; CT: paclitaxel 50mg/m2 d1, qw + CBP AUC2 d1, qw, weekly for 5 wks; Surgery: 4-6 weeks after nCRT
Interventions
50.4Gy/28F radiation and concurrent chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus CBP used weekly
41.4Gy/23F radiation and concurrent chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus CBP used weekly
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age:18-70 years
- Histologically verified squamous carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.
- Patients with performance status 0-1 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale at the pre CRT evaluation and judges to be fit for surgery at the pre and post CRT evaluations.
- Tumors should be resectable or potentially resectable and without distant metastasis, as assessed before neoadjuvant CRT, including clinical stage T2-4N0M0 or T1-4N1M0 according to the 6th AJCC system.
- Joined the study voluntarily and signed informed consent form
- No surgical contraindications
- No serious system dysfunction and immuno-deficiency, Adequate organ function including the following: Hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL, Neutrophils (ANC )≥1.5x109/L, platelet count ≥100x 109/L, TBIL\<1.5 x ULN, ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN, creatinine≤1.5 x ULN
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical esophageal cancer (The upper end of the lesion is in the esophagus of the cervical segment).
- Patients with biopsy (by endoscopic ultrasound, laparoscopy, or laparotomy) proven metastatic supraclavicular or celiac nodes are ineligible.
- Invasion of the tracheobronchial tree or aorta
- Tracheoesophageal fistula
- Concurrent pregnancy or lactation
- Severe diabetes mellitus with poor blood glucose control
- History of a second malignancy
- Patients being unable to undergo esophageal reconstruction with gastric tube, due to prior surgery.
- Patients undergoing esophageal reconstruction with jejunum.
- Patients have allergy reaction or contraindications to taxanes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Related Publications (7)
Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Zalcberg JR, Simes RJ, Barbour A, Gebski V; Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):681-92. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
PMID: 21684205BACKGROUNDShapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, van Laarhoven HWM, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Hospers GAP, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJB, Busch ORC, Ten Kate FJW, Creemers GM, Punt CJA, Plukker JTM, Verheul HMW, Bilgen EJS, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJC, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AHM, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A; CROSS study group. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
PMID: 26254683BACKGROUNDTepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Reed CE, Goldberg R, Kiel K, Willett C, Sugarbaker D, Mayer R. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 1;26(7):1086-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9593.
PMID: 18309943BACKGROUNDGebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM, Foo K, Zalcberg J, Simes J; Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Mar;8(3):226-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70039-6.
PMID: 17329193BACKGROUNDNoordman BJ, Verdam MGE, Lagarde SM, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, van Laarhoven HWM, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Hospers GAP, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJB, Busch OR, Ten Kate FJW, Creemers GM, Punt CJA, Plukker JTM, Verheul HMW, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJC, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AHM, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, Sprangers MAG, van Lanschot JJB. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Esophageal or Junctional Cancer: Results From the Randomized CROSS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 20;36(3):268-275. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7718. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
PMID: 29161204BACKGROUNDvan Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
PMID: 22646630BACKGROUNDTeoh AY, Chiu PW, Yeung WK, Liu SY, Wong SK, Ng EK. Long-term survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation versus surgery in patients with resectable squamous carcinoma of the esophagus: results from a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):165-71. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds206. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
PMID: 22887465BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Weimin Mao, M.D.
Zhejiang Caner Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Head of thoracic surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2017
First Posted
December 22, 2017
Study Start
February 22, 2018
Primary Completion
February 22, 2021
Study Completion
February 22, 2023
Last Updated
November 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2022-03