NCT03381443

Brief Summary

Participants of Immediate Life Support and Advanced Life Support Courses, where two different summative assessment methods were used are asked about their satisfaction with the assessment method using a questionnaire. Both quantitative questions using an 11-point-Likert scale as well as open-ended qualitative questions will be asked. The primary aim of this study is to find out which variant of summative assessment is perceived by course participants as testing their leadership competency best, immediately after the comparison as well as 1 year later to identify any long-term effects on the students.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
428

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 2, 2017

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 22, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

December 18, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 3, 2020

Conditions

Assessment Evaluation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Participant satisfaction with summative assessment methods during Life Support Courses

    evaluation of NTS assessed by assessment

    directly after assessment and 1 year later

Study Arms (2)

ERC

all students assessed by the methods used by the European Resuscitation Council

Other: different assessments

AHA

all students assessed by the methods used by the American Heart Association

Other: different assessments

Interventions

different assessmentsOTHER

coded survey about NTS and assessment

AHAERC

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

All 5th and 6th year medical students at the University of Bern, Switzerland, study year 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

You may qualify if:

  • All 5th and 6th year medical students at the University of Bern, Switzerland, study year 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Bern

Bern, Switzerland

Location

Study Officials

  • Robert Greif, Prof.

    University of Bern

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2017

First Posted

December 22, 2017

Study Start

December 2, 2017

Primary Completion

December 30, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

CH(1)