Anchor for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
ARiSe
The Use of Anchor Versus Suturing for Attachment of Vaginal Mesh in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of absorbable anchor compared to suturing for mesh attachment to vagina in robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy on the length of surgery for this portion of the procedure.
- 2.SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 6, 2019
March 1, 2019
2.1 years
December 4, 2017
March 4, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mesh Attachment Time
Mesh Attachment Time
Assessed at one time point, during the participants surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Perioperative Complications
Assessed at one time point, during the participants surgery.
Postoperative Complications
Assessed at two time points, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Surgeon Satisfaction
Assessed at one time point, during the participants surgery.
Surgical Failure
Assessed at two time points, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Vaginal wall appearance
Assessed at two time points, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Anchor
EXPERIMENTALAnchor used for mesh attachment
Suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORSuture used for mesh attachment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 21 or older
- Diagnosis of POP, defined as the descent of one or more of four different anatomic structures, a)the uterus(cervix), b)the apex of the vagina (in those status post hysterectomy) c) the anterior vaginal wall, or d) the posterior vaginal wall. This is defined on exam as the POPQ points Ba, C, or Bp \>0 cm beyond the hymen, uterine(cervix) descent into at least the lower half the vagina (defined as point c\> -tvl/2) or post hysterectomy vault into the lower 2/3 of the vagina. Bothersome bulge symptoms as indicated on question 3 of the Pelvic Floor Disorder Inventory (PFDI-20) form relating to 'sensation of bulging' or something 'falling out'
- Desire surgical treatment for POP with SCP
- Available for up to 6 months of follow up
- Not pregnant or desiring future pregnancy
- Written informed consent is obtained.
You may not qualify if:
- Known adverse reaction to synthetic mesh, or complications including but not limited to erosion, fistula, or abscess.
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2, CIN3, or cancer)
- Unresolved chronic pelvic pain
- Prior abdominal or pelvic radiation
- Contraindications to the surgical procedures including known horseshoe kidney, pelvic abscess or active diverticular abscess or diverticulitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanentelead
- University of California, San Diegocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kaiser Permanent San Diego
San Diego, California, 92110, United States
Related Publications (1)
Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):258.e1-258.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 13.
PMID: 32413431DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alexander A Berger
Kaiser Permanente
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shawn A Menefee, MD
Kaiser Permanente
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2017
First Posted
December 20, 2017
Study Start
November 29, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share