Exploring the Role of the GABAergic Modulation in Pain Transmission in Human
NDMC-101
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neuropathic pain affects about 7% of the general population in European countries. Meta-analyses indicate that only a minority of neuropathic pain patients has adequate response to drug therapy and management of neuropathic pain is still an unmet medical need. New insights into the contribution of defined subtypes of GABAA receptors (GABAARs) to the different clinical effects of benzodiazepines, including analgesia, have suggested that α1-sparing selective benzodiazepines, such as N-desmethylclobazam (NDMC), may be a new realistic alternative for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Results from our previous study in healthy volunteers assessing the antihyperalgesic and sedative effects of benzodiazepines on a UVB-induced pain model of central sensitization showed that, at the time of maximum effect, clobazam and clonazepam antihyperalgesic effect was greater than placebo by respectively 15.7% (95% CI 0.8 - 30.5) and 28.6% (95% CI 4.5 - 52.6), p\<0.05. Moreover difference in sedation (VAS), as compared to placebo, was only significant for clonazepam 26.3mm (95%CI 15.0-37.7), p\<0.001. Our preclinical data also demonstrate that, in recombinant receptors, NDMC has a better α2- over α1GABAARs activity ratio than clobazam and diazepam. And, unlike diazepam, NDMC caused no or modest sedation at antihyperalgesic doses in two strains of wild-type mice. In addition NDMC α2/α1 in vitro activity profile and long term clinical experience from its marketed parent compound (clobazam) make it an advisable clinical candidate for further proof-of-concept assessments in human. Therefore the Geneva University Hospitals have manufactured a new chemical entity and initiated a drug development program for NDMC starting with this proof-of-concept phase 1b randomized double-blind crossover (4 arms) study that will assess the analgesic and sedative effects of NDMC 20mg and 60mg compared to clonazepam 1.5 mg or placebo on a UVB-induced erythema pain model in healthy volunteers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2018
CompletedApril 19, 2019
April 1, 2019
9 months
September 8, 2017
April 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the area of secondary hyperalgesia from baseline
The mapping of the area of secondary hyperalgesia is determined by pricking the skin surrounding the erythema with a hand-held von Frey filament (235 mN), normally felt as non-painful. The punctuated probe is moved along the 8 radial lines defined by the center (erythema) and the corners of a regular octagon. Testing starts outside the hyperalgesic area and the probe is moved towards the center in steps of 5 mm. The position is marked where the pin-prick sensation changes to become painful. Once complete boundaries had been defined, the areas are transcribed onto clear film and weighed. The surface area will then be calculated based on a standard measure of the weight of an area of 100cm2.
Hour 1, Hour 2, Hour 3, Hour 4, Hour 5, Hour 6, Hour 7, Hour 8, Hour 9, Hour 10 following drug administration
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in static mechanical pain threshold (SMPT) from baseline
Hour 1, Hour 2, Hour 3, Hour 4, Hour 5, Hour 6, Hour 7, Hour 8, Hour 9, Hour 10 following drug administration
Change in dynamic mechanical sensory VAS (DMSV) from baseline
Hour 1, Hour 2, Hour 3, Hour 4, Hour 5, Hour 6, Hour 7, Hour 8, Hour 9, Hour 10 following drug administration
Change in subjective feeling of sedation from baseline
Hour 1, Hour 2, Hour 3, Hour 4, Hour 5, Hour 6, Hour 7, Hour 8, Hour 9, Hour 10 following drug administration
Change in memory test score from baseline
Hour 4 and Hour 10 following drug administration
Change in AUC of N-desmethylclobazam from Baseline following administration of single dose (20mg, 40mg and 60mg) of N-desmethylclobazam
Hour 0.5, Hour 1, Hour 2, Hour 4, Hour 6, Hour 8, Hour 10, Hour 12, Hour 24, Hour 32, DAY 3, DAY 4, DAY 5, DAY 6, DAY 7, DAY 8, DAY 9, DAY 10, DAY 14 following drug administration
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
NDMC 20mg
EXPERIMENTALoral single dose
NDMC 60mg
EXPERIMENTALoral single dose
Clonazepam 1.5mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORoral single dose
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORoral single dose
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male subject, age between 18 and 50 years old
- Caucasian
- Type 3 skin phototype (white skin that can tan gradually and burns moderately)
- Non smoker or moderate smoker (\< 10 cigarettes/day)
- No clinically abnormal findings on history and/or on physical examination
- Positive minimal erythema dose (MED) determination
You may not qualify if:
- Any active significant illness
- Current or past history of drug and alcohol abuse or current intake of more than 3 glasses of alcohol a day or more than 21 glasses of alcohol per week
- Psychotropic drug intake during the last month
- Sun allergy or any skin disease
- Any regular drug intake
- CYP2C19 poor metabolizer (phenotype)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jules Desmeuleslead
Study Sites (1)
UGeneva
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2017
First Posted
December 15, 2017
Study Start
March 30, 2017
Primary Completion
December 28, 2017
Study Completion
January 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04