NCT03372265

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND Total knee arthroplasty can be severely painful, and peripheral regional anesthesia is highly recommended as part of the perioperative pain treatment. Whether catheter-based techniques are better than single injection techniques are debatable. Furthermore, in catheter-based techniques, whether a low-dose automated, periodic infusion can produce similar analgesic effectiveness compared to a conventional, high dose, continuous infusion has never been explored. AIM Comparison of the analgesic effectiveness of a low-dose automated, periodic infusion, a conventional continuous infusion and patient-controlled boluses only in catheter-based adductor canal blocks for patients undergoing total knee arthrplasty.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Typical duration for phase_4 postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 6, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 13, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 17, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

December 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Peripheral regional anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative pain, 1-72 hours postoperatively

    Postoperative pain using the visual analogue pain scale (VAS, 0-100 milimetres). Measurements will be patient-reported.

    1-72 hours

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Opioid consumption, 1-72 hours postoperatively

    1-72 hours

  • Volume of patient-initiated boluses, 1-72 hours postoperatively

    1-72 hours

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Opioid related side effects

    1-72 hours

  • Pain at bolus request

    1-72 hours

  • Motor nerve block

    1-72 hours

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

API+PCA

EXPERIMENTAL

Infusion of ropivacaine 0.2 %, 15 mL, every 10th hour. Patient-initiated bolus of ropivacaine 0,2 %, 15 mL. Lock-out time: 5 hours.

Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2%

CI+PCA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2 %, 6 mL/hour. Patient-initiated bolus of ropivacaine 0,2 %, 15 mL. Lock-out time: 5 hours.

Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2%

PCA only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient-initiated bolus of ropivacaine 0,2 %, 15 mL. Lock-out time: 5 hours.

Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2%

Interventions

Perineural infusion using a peripheral nerve block catheter and a portable infusion pump.

Also known as: Naropin 0.2%
API+PCACI+PCAPCA only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I-III
  • Normal cognitive function in order to sign written, informed consent and to understand trial protocol
  • Agreement to the trial protocol, including the randomized manner

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to LA
  • Infection in or near insertion site of the peripheral nerve catheter
  • Anatomical abnormalities preventing successful peripheral catheter insertion
  • Habitual use of opioids

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød

Hillerød, DK-3400, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, DMSci

    Department of Anesthesiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital & University of Copenhagen

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
All patients and outcome assessors will be blinded to the delivery administrations. Investigators will not be present while programming of the infusion pump is taking place. The display of the infusion pump will be concealed at all times after initiation. Furthermore, throughout the trial, the infusion pump will be concealed from the patient through a non-transparent bag. Trial interventions will not be visible in electronic patient charts. The infusion pump is making a discrete noise when administering medications. To make sure that the PCA group and the continuous infusion group is blinded to interventions, a sham administration is activated every 10th hour. This sham administration will be 0.1 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. Such a small dose of LA will not have any anesthetic effect nor pose a risk for the patient.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 3 arms (API, CI and PCA only)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2017

First Posted

December 13, 2017

Study Start

December 6, 2017

Primary Completion

February 1, 2019

Study Completion

April 1, 2019

Last Updated

September 17, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Locations