Project Legacy Impact Evaluation Study
1 other identifier
interventional
571
1 country
12
Brief Summary
This study will design and rigorously evaluate the efficacy of Project Legacy, a five week positive youth development intervention to decrease sexual risk for unintended pregnancies and STIs among youth experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness aged 14-19. This randomized control trial will compare Project Legacy to a usual services control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2021
CompletedJanuary 3, 2024
December 1, 2023
3.4 years
November 17, 2017
December 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline lack of consistent current use (<80%) of contraception (including condoms) at 11 months
Current use of contraception (including condoms) is defined as using contraception at \>80% of instances of vaginal intercourse in the past 3 months.
Assessed at baseline and 11 months post-baseline
Change from baseline in current vaginal and anal sex without condom at 11 months
This outcome measure is defined as the proportion of instances of vaginal and anal sex without a condom in the past 3 months.
Assessed at baseline and 11 months post-baseline
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Sexual initiation / activity (vaginal)
Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline
Current birth control use (vaginal sex)
Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline
Current condom use (vaginal sex)
Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline
Proportion of youth who have vaginal intercourse without the consistent use of contraception
Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline
Current contraception use (among females)
Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control/comparison group will be receiving only their usual services which are offered at the agencies they frequent, including mental health services, case management, job training, educational services, and, in specific venue contexts, may receive HIV risk reduction or other "sex education" interventions such as Street Smart. These same services are also open to the intervention group. Usage of these services varies by site (residential vs drop-in; city (San Diego vs Los Angeles) and type of service (case management, mental health, health care, etc.).
Project Legacy
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental/intervention arm will receive the Project Legacy intervention
Interventions
Project Legacy - Project Legacy is a 5-week, twice a week, 10 sessions small group intervention that encourages homeless and at-risk of homeless youth ages 14-19 to imagine a positive future and discuss how current risk behaviors can be a barrier to a successful adulthood. The program includes thinking about the future, the importance of positive social supports, short and long-term goal planning, and decision making. The program also includes life skills building, addressing past and current risk behaviors, linking to resources and navigating service systems, information on contraception and condoms, a healthy life plan and self-sufficiency. The 5 content core elements are the following: * 1\. Thinking about the future * 2\. Present actions to achieve future success * 3\. Safeguarding one's future * 4\. Creating a Healthy Life Plan * 5\. Navigating service systems
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Served or identified on outreach by one of our partner homeless youth serving agencies in Los Angeles or San Diego
- years of age
- English-language speaker (able to complete consent and survey in English)
- not currently pregnant
- no immediate travel plans (are planning on being in the area for the length of the intervention - 8 weeks).
You may not qualify if:
- Outside of age range
- Currently pregnant
- Not planning to be in the area for the length of the intervention
- Previously enrolled in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Children's Hospital Los Angeleslead
- ETR Associatescollaborator
Study Sites (12)
Five Keys
Boyle Heights, California, 90033, United States
Youth Program
Long Beach, California, 90712, United States
Century Villages at Cabrillo
Long Beach, California, 90810, United States
Da Vinci Rise High
Los Angeles, California, 90011, United States
LA CAUSA Youth Build
Los Angeles, California, 90022, United States
Covenant House
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Los Angeles LGBT Center
Los Angeles, California, 90038, United States
YMCA of San Diego County
Oceanside, California, 92054, United States
San Diego Central Library
San Diego, California, 92101, United States
San Diego Youth Services
San Diego, California, 92110, United States
Monarch School
San Diego, California, 92113, United States
Safe Place for Youth
Venice, California, 90291, United States
Related Publications (16)
De Rosa CJ, Montgomery SB, Kipke MD, Iverson E, Ma JL, Unger JB. Service utilization among homeless and runaway youth in Los Angeles, California: rates and reasons. J Adolesc Health. 1999 Mar;24(3):190-200. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(98)00081-0.
PMID: 10195802BACKGROUNDEdidin JP, Ganim Z, Hunter SJ, Karnik NS. The mental and physical health of homeless youth: a literature review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012 Jun;43(3):354-75. doi: 10.1007/s10578-011-0270-1.
PMID: 22120422BACKGROUNDRotheram-Borus MJ, Song J, Gwadz M, Lee M, Van Rossem R, Koopman C. Reductions in HIV risk among runaway youth. Prev Sci. 2003 Sep;4(3):173-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1024697706033.
PMID: 12940468BACKGROUNDTucker JS, Sussell J, Golinelli D, Zhou A, Kennedy DP, Wenzel SL. Understanding pregnancy-related attitudes and behaviors: a mixed-methods study of homeless youth. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;44(4):252-61. doi: 10.1363/4425212. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
PMID: 23231333BACKGROUNDZimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095.
PMID: 2280326BACKGROUNDChen P, Vazsonyi AT. Future orientation, impulsivity, and problem behaviors: a longitudinal moderation model. Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1633-45. doi: 10.1037/a0025327. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
PMID: 21895358BACKGROUNDOyserman D, Terry K, Bybee D. A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. J Adolesc. 2002 Jun;25(3):313-26. doi: 10.1006/jado.2002.0474.
PMID: 12128042BACKGROUNDThompson, S., Pollio, D., Constantine, J., Reid, D., Nebbitt, V. Short-term outcomes of youth receiving runaway and homeless shelter services. Research on Social Work Practice. 2002 Sept; 12: 589-603
BACKGROUNDJuntunen, C.L., & Wettersten, K. Work hope: Development and initial validation of a measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2006; 53(1): 94-106.
BACKGROUNDRobitschek, C. Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development: American Counseling Association. 1998; 30(4): 183-198.
BACKGROUNDStrauman, T.J. (2006). Adolescent Regulatory Focus Questionnaire. Unpublished questionnaire, Duke University, Durham, NC.
BACKGROUNDRice E, Milburn NG, Monro W. Social networking technology, social network composition, and reductions in substance use among homeless adolescents. Prev Sci. 2011 Mar;12(1):80-8. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0191-4.
PMID: 21194011BACKGROUNDHansen WB, Paskett ED, Carter LJ. The Adolescent Sexual Activity Index (ASAI): a standardized strategy for measuring interpersonal heterosexual behaviors among youth. Health Educ Res. 1999 Aug;14(4):485-90. doi: 10.1093/her/14.4.485.
PMID: 10557519BACKGROUNDTrussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
PMID: 21477680BACKGROUNDOyserman D, Bybee D, Terry K, & Hart-Johnson T. Possible selves as roadmaps. Journal of Research in Personality 38: 130-149, 2004.
BACKGROUNDHiggins ET. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol. 1997 Dec;52(12):1280-300. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.12.1280.
PMID: 9414606BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leslie F Clark, PhD, MPH
University of Southern California
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2017
First Posted
December 8, 2017
Study Start
October 30, 2017
Primary Completion
March 30, 2021
Study Completion
March 30, 2021
Last Updated
January 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share