Study Stopped
lake of efficiency and poor tolerance of endoscopic technique
Endoscopic Resection in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
RESECT-RGO
Monocentric Study Evaluating the Efficiency and Safety of Anti-reflux Mucosectomy ARMS for the Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This long-term PPI treatment would likely increase the risk of pulmonary and digestive infections and would not prevent evolution to adenocarcinoma of Barrett's Esophagus. Surgical fundoplication is generally recommended when symptoms are poorly controlled with PPIs and considered as standard treatment despite celioscopy risk. A variety of endoscopic techniques for the treatment of GERD has been proposed to obtain non-surgical control. These endoscopic techniques aim to bring the tissues closer to the Œsogastric (JOG) junction. But a low response rate has been demonstrated with these techniques. H. Inoue (inventor of the anti-reflux mucosectomy 20 years ago) and his team postulated that the reflux symptoms would be reduced by creating a relative restriction of gastric cardia. The healing of the mucosectomy zone led to restriction of gastric cardia. This observation suggested that ARMS could represent an effective anti-reflux procedure with the advantage that no prostheses would be left in situ. Few studies have evaluated this new endoscopic technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of gastric mucosectomy for patients with GERD resistant to medical treatment or requiring long-term maintenance medical treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2023
CompletedApril 4, 2019
April 1, 2019
2 years
October 13, 2017
April 3, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of patients no longer requiring medical treatment at 6 months
Suggest that endoscopic treatment would allow the cessation of medical treatment in 50% of cases Rate of patients no longer requiring medical treatment at 6 months
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Improvement in quality of life
6 months
Improvement of gastric PH
6 months
Evaluation for morbidity
30 days
Study Arms (1)
Endoscopic treatment
EXPERIMENTALENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION AT DAY 1
Interventions
Mucosectomy performed at day 1. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is at least 3 cm long. The mucosal resection is carried out along the side of the small curvature of the stomach, in order to preserve a valve of the cardia at the level of the large curvature of the stomach. A coloured solution is injected into the submucosa following markers. The correct submucosal injection is confirmed by the lifting of the mucosal surface. A submucosal dissection is carried out using the dual knife. The mucosectomy is repeatedly performed until the mucosal zone is completely resected. The choice of the resection technique will depend on the anatomy of the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with GERD resistant to medical treatment, or requiring daily long-term medical treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to the realization of a upper GI endoscopy
- Achalasia or other esophageal motor disorders
- Voluminous hiatal hernia Haemorrhagic, haemostasis or coagulation disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
LAQUIERE
Marseille, 13008, France
Related Publications (16)
Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Eklund S, Langstrom G, Lind T, Lundell L; LOTUS Trial Collaborators. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1969-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.626.
PMID: 21586712RESULTCicala M, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, Ribolsi M. Proton pump inhibitor resistance, the real challenge in gastro-esophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 21;19(39):6529-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i39.6529.
PMID: 24151377RESULTKellokumpu I, Voutilainen M, Haglund C, Farkkila M, Roberts PJ, Kautiainen H. Quality of life following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: assessing short-term and long-term outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 28;19(24):3810-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3810.
PMID: 23840119RESULTMarret H, Pierre F, Chapron C, Perrotin F, Body G, Lansac J. [Complications of laparoscopy caused by trocars. Preliminary study from the national registry of the French Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(4):405-12. French.
PMID: 9265066RESULTRickenbacher N, Kotter T, Kochen MM, Scherer M, Blozik E. Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):143-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3140-z. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
PMID: 24018760RESULTMahmood Z, Byrne PJ, McMahon BP, Murphy EM, Arfin Q, Ravi N, Weir DG, Reynolds JV. Comparison of transesophageal endoscopic plication (TEP) with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in the treatment of uncomplicated reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):431-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00534.x.
PMID: 16542276RESULTTriadafilopoulos G. Stretta: a valuable endoscopic treatment modality for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7730-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7730.
PMID: 24976710RESULTFeretis C, Benakis P, Dimopoulos C, Dailianas A, Filalithis P, Stamou KM, Manouras A, Apostolidis N. Endoscopic implantation of Plexiglas (PMMA) microspheres for the treatment of GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Apr;53(4):423-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.113912.
PMID: 11275880RESULTCicala M, Gabbrielli A, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, Ribolsi M, Caviglia R, Costamagna G. Effect of endoscopic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (Gatekeeper reflux repair system) on intraoesophageal dynamic characteristics of acid reflux. Gut. 2005 Feb;54(2):183-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.040501.
PMID: 15647177RESULTWong RF, Davis TV, Peterson KA. Complications involving the mediastinum after injection of Enteryx for GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 May;61(6):753-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02645-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 15855987RESULTChuttani R, Sud R, Sachdev G, Puri R, Kozarek R, Haber G, Pleskow D, Zaman M, Lembo A. A novel endoscopic full-thickness plicator for the treatment of GERD: A pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Nov;58(5):770-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02027-3.
PMID: 14595322RESULTCadiere GB, Buset M, Muls V, Rajan A, Rosch T, Eckardt AJ, Weerts J, Bastens B, Costamagna G, Marchese M, Louis H, Mana F, Sermon F, Gawlicka AK, Daniel MA, Deviere J. Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1676-88. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9594-9.
PMID: 18443855RESULTSatodate H, Inoue H, Yoshida T, Usui S, Iwashita M, Fukami N, Shiokawa A, Kudo SE. Circumferential EMR of carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus: case report. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Aug;58(2):288-92. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.361. No abstract available.
PMID: 12872107RESULTInoue H, Ito H, Ikeda H, Sato C, Sato H, Phalanusitthepha C, Hayee B, Eleftheriadis N, Kudo SE. Anti-reflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the absence of hiatus hernia: a pilot study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27(4):346-351.
PMID: 25330784RESULTVelanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR, Tapia FV, Harkabus MA. Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Sep;183(3):217-24.
PMID: 8784314RESULTLaquiere A, Trottier-Tellier F, Urena-Campos R, Lienne P, Lecomte L, Katsogiannou M, Penaranda G, Boustiere C. Evaluation of Antireflux Mucosectomy for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Medium-Term Results of a Pilot Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 21;2022:1606944. doi: 10.1155/2022/1606944. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35237316DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arthur Laquière, MD
French Society of Digestive Endoscopy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2017
First Posted
November 30, 2017
Study Start
April 10, 2017
Primary Completion
April 10, 2019
Study Completion
April 10, 2023
Last Updated
April 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share