Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women
A Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Multi-center Double-blind Study of Efficacy Tolerability & Safety of Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (uUTI) in Adult Women
1 other identifier
interventional
1,671
1 country
60
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Aug 2018
60 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 17, 2020
CompletedJanuary 12, 2021
December 1, 2019
1.5 years
November 20, 2017
November 20, 2020
December 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall Success
Overall Success: Clinical Success (resolution of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) symptoms present at study entry and no new symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
Day 12+/-1 day
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall Success
Overall Success is Clinical Success (resolution of uUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new uUTI symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
Day 12 +/- 1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic Success
Day 12+/-1 day
Other Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat (Micro-MITT) Participants With Overall Success
12 +/- 1 day
Study Arms (2)
Sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid
EXPERIMENTALSulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid 500 mg PO twice daily for 5 days
Ciprofloxacin
ACTIVE COMPARATORCiprofloxacin 250 mg PO administered twice daily for 3 days
Interventions
Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection
Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients ≥18 years of age with 24-96 hours of urinary symptoms attributable to a urinary tract infection (UTI)
- Two of the following signs and symptoms of uUTI: urinary frequency, urinary urgency, pain or burning micturition, suprapubic pain
- A mid-stream urine specimen with:
- a dipstick analysis positive for nitrite AND
- evidence of pyuria as defined by either:
- i. a dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase ii. at least 10 white blood cells per cubic millimeter on microscopic analysis of unspun urine iii. White blood cell count ≥10 cells/high-powered field in the sediment of a spun urine
- Has given written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of signs and symptoms suggestive of acute pyelonephritis: fever (temperature \> 38°Celsius), chills, costovertebral angle tenderness, flank pain, nausea, and/or vomiting
- Receipt of antibacterial drug therapy potentially effective as treatment of uUTI within the prior 7 days
- Concurrent use of non-study treatments that would have a potential effect on outcome evaluations in patients with uUTI
- Patients with ileal loops or urinary stoma
- Patients with an indwelling urinary catheter in the previous 30 days
- Patients with paraplegia
- Patients who are likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis after treatment of uUTI (e.g., patients with vesico-ureteral reflux)
- Any history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract
- Patient's urine culture, if available at study entry, identify more than 2 microorganisms regardless of colony count or patient has a confirmed fungal UTI
- Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or had a renal transplant
- Known history of creatinine clearance \<50 mL/min
- Patients known to have liver disease
- Patients who are pregnant, or females of child-bearing age unable to take adequate contraceptive precautions
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Patients with history of blood dyscrasias
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (60)
Medical Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, 35242, United States
Medical Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032, United States
Medical Facility
Tolleson, Arizona, 85353, United States
Medical Facility
Cerritos, California, 90703, United States
Medical Facility
Chula Vista, California, 91911, United States
Medical Facility
Fullerton, California, 92835, United States
Medical Facility
La Mesa, California, 91942, United States
Medical Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90057, United States
Medical Facility
San Diego, California, 92108, United States
Medical Facility
Sylmar, California, 91342, United States
Medical Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20011, United States
Medical Facility
Bradenton, Florida, 34209, United States
Medical Facility
Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States
Medical Facility
Doral, Florida, 33166, United States
Medical Facility
Edgewater, Florida, 32132, United States
Medical Facility
Hialeah, Florida, 33012, United States
Medical Facility
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33126, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33135, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33144, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33145, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33155, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33165, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33172, United States
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33173, United States
Medical Facility
Miami Springs, Florida, 33166, United States
Medical Facility
New Port Richey, Florida, 34653, United States
Medical Facility
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174, United States
Medical Facility
Palmetto Bay, Florida, 33157, United States
Medical Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33711, United States
Medical Facility
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880, United States
Medical Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312, United States
Medical Facility
Norcross, Georgia, 30092, United States
Medical Facility
Perry, Georgia, 31069, United States
Medical Facility
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601, United States
Medical Facility
Metairie, Louisiana, 70115, United States
Medical Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115, United States
Medical Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109, United States
Medical Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121, United States
Medical Facility
Brooklyn, New York, 11215, United States
Medical Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Medical Facility
Hugo, Oklahoma, 74743, United States
Medical Facility
Easley, South Carolina, 29640, United States
Medical Facility
Lancaster, South Carolina, 29720, United States
Medical Facility
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
Medical Facility
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Medical Facility
Austin, Texas, 78735, United States
Medical Facility
Carrollton, Texas, 75010, United States
Medical Facility
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414, United States
Medical Facility
Dallas, Texas, 75204, United States
Medical Facility
Houston, Texas, 77029, United States
Medical Facility
Houston, Texas, 77036, United States
Medical Facility
Pearland, Texas, 77584, United States
Medical Facility
Plano, Texas, 75024, United States
Medical Facility
Sugar Land, Texas, 77478, United States
Medical Facility
Bountiful, Utah, 84010, United States
Medical Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109, United States
Medical Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121, United States
Medical Facility
South Jordan, Utah, 84095, United States
Medical Facility
St. George, Utah, 84790, United States
Related Publications (1)
Dunne MW, Aronin SI, Das AF, Akinapelli K, Zelasky MT, Puttagunta S, Boucher HW. Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):66-77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac738.
PMID: 36069202DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director, Clinical Development
- Organization
- Iterum Therapeutics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2017
First Posted
November 28, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2018
Primary Completion
January 16, 2020
Study Completion
January 20, 2020
Last Updated
January 12, 2021
Results First Posted
December 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share