Lyophilized Fecal Transplant vs Lyophilized Fecal Filtrate in Recurrent C Diff Infection
A Prospective Double Blind Randomized Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) to Lyophilized Sterile Fecal Filtrate in the Management of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI) has traditionally been offered as fecal slurry administered by enema, nasogastric tube or endoscopy. Frozen oral capsules have also shown efficacy. The potential advantage of lyophilized FMT is the relative ease of manufacturing and storage compared with fecal slurry. Sterile fecal filtrate has previously been shown to prevent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) recurrence, suggesting that live bacteria may not be needed. This study will compare lyophilized sterile fecal filtrate (LSFF) with lyophilized FMT (LFMT) in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2019
CompletedFebruary 20, 2020
February 1, 2020
1.3 years
November 6, 2017
February 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Resolution of RCDI
Proportion of subjects without RCDI
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Resolution of RCDI
24 weeks
Serious Adverse Events
8 weeks
Serious Adverse Events
8 weeks
Minor Adverse Events
1 week
Minor Adverse Events
1 week
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LFMT
ACTIVE COMPARATORLyophilized fecal microbiota transplant capsules
LSFF
EXPERIMENTALLyophilized sterile fecal filtrate capsules
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- at least 3 episodes of recurrent CDI, with each episode defined as 3 or more unformed stools in 24 hours associated with positive Clostridium difficile toxin, each occurring within 3 months of each other.
- CDI under symptomatic control with 3 or fewer unformed stools in 24 hours for at least 2 consecutive days prior to treatment
- Ability to provide informed consent.
- Females and males must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study as applicable
You may not qualify if:
- Complicated CDI defined as WBC \>35, significant abdominal pain and distention, evidence of toxin megacolon or pseudomembraneous colitis, hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg unresponsive to fluid resuscitation, end organ failure, or requiring admission to intensive care.
- Chronic diarrheal illness such as irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease unless under control or in remission of 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Taking or planning to take an investigational drug within 3 months of enrollment.
- Immunosuppression
- Chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- oropharyngeal or significant esophageal dysphagia
- Ileus or small bowel obstruction
- Subtotal colectomy
- Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant within 3 months of enrollment
- Breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed during the trial
- Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy.
- Life expectancy \<6 months -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dina Kaolead
- University of Albertacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2X8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dina Kao, MD
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- LFMT and LSFF capsules appear identical. Randomization is performed by lab staff not involved in any aspect of treatment administration or care
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2017
First Posted
November 27, 2017
Study Start
February 14, 2018
Primary Completion
June 5, 2019
Study Completion
October 10, 2019
Last Updated
February 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share