Improving Antimicrobial-Prescribing in Emergency Departments
The Use of Audit-and-Feedback to Improve Antimicrobial-Prescribing in Emergency Departments: a Quasi-experimental Study
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Antimicrobial resistance is one of today's most urgent public health problems. One of the most important strategies to slow the spread of antimicrobial resistance is the promotion of judicious antimicrobial use. There are tremendous opportunities to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial-prescribing, particularly in Emergency Departments (EDs). In this study, the investigators will work collaboratively with ED providers in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use. Academic-detailing and an audit-and-feedback intervention will be implemented, and the study will assess how overall antimicrobial-prescribing changes once these interventions are performed. ED providers will be shown how their antimicrobial-prescribing compares to their peers, thereby encouraging them to consider their professional reputation when making prescribing decisions. To assess the impact of this intervention, the study will monitor providers' antimicrobial-prescribing behavior through an automated metric, i.e. number of antimicrobial prescriptions per number of patient-visits. To assess changes in the appropriateness of antimicrobial-prescribing, the study team will also perform manual chart reviews and compare prescribing decisions to published guidelines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 28, 2021
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
12 months
November 17, 2017
January 25, 2021
April 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Patient-visits Prescribed an Antimicrobial at Their ED Visit
This outcomes is defined as the total number of antimicrobial-prescribing visits divided by the total number of patient-visits. This metric will be calculated on a monthly basis for each site (2 intervention, 2 control). It will be calculated during the baseline and intervention periods. Therefore, each site will contribute 24 data points.
This outcome will be calculated every month during the baseline and intervention periods. An interrupted time-series analysis will be performed to evaluate how this monthly percentage changed after the intervention period began.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Patient-visits Prescribed a Late Antimicrobial Prescription More Than 24 Hours After But Within 30 Days of Their ED Visit
For both intervention and control sites, the outcome will be reported as a monthly median, which is calculated across the 12 baseline and the 12 intervention months.
Percentage of Patient-visits Who Were Hospitalized More Than 24 Hours After But Within 30 Days of Their ED Visit
For both intervention and control sites, the outcome will be reported as a monthly median, which is calculated across the 12 baseline and the 12 intervention months.
Percentage of Patient-visits Who Died More Than 24 Hours After But Within 30 Days of Their ED Visit
For both intervention and control sites, the outcome will be reported as a monthly median, which is calculated across the 12 baseline and the 12 intervention months.
Percentage of Patient-visits Who Underwent Clostridium Difficile Testing More Than 24 Hours After But Within 30 Days of Their ED Visit
For both intervention and control sites, the outcome will be reported as a monthly median, which is calculated across the 12 baseline and the 12 intervention months.
Percentage of Patient-visits Who Received Guideline Concordant Antimicrobial Management
For the baseline and intervention periods, this outcome will be reported as the percentage of patients who received guideline-concordant management among the sample of qualifying ED visits that were randomly selected for manual chart review.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Audit-and-feedback
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental arm will consist of Emergency Department providers who do receive the intervention.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control arm will consist of providers who do not receive the intervention.
Interventions
We will monitor the antimicrobial-prescribing of providers in the experimental arm. Our study team will meet with providers in the experimental arm to provide guidance on optimal antimicrobial-prescribing. We will provide personalized feedback to providers in the experimental arm once every quarter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- An ED provider at one of the intervention or control sites.
You may not qualify if:
- An ED provider who sees less than 100 patients in the ED per year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Centerlead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Richard Roudebush VAMC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Sioux Falls VA
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Because the study was not randomized, we cannot exclude temporal confounding or selection bias. By conducting a time-series analysis, we tried to account for confounders that may change over time, and by including a matched-control group, we tried to minimize the possibility of regression to the mean. Second, we cannot exclude the possibility that sites had any other processes in place that could have influenced our outcomes.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Daniel Livorsi
- Organization
- Iowa City VA Health Care System
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician-investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2017
First Posted
November 21, 2017
Study Start
October 9, 2018
Primary Completion
September 30, 2019
Study Completion
October 31, 2019
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Results First Posted
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share