Comparison of Stethee® to the Conventional Stethoscope for Auscultation of Simulated Heart Sounds
STELIT
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the relative capability of Stethee® (new wireless digital stethoscope) and 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™ (conventional stethoscope) in the identification of manikin-simulated heart sounds by medical doctors. A randomised, non-blinded, two-period crossover, non-inferiority design will be used to compare the acoustic performance of the two stethoscopes. We aim to determine if Stethee® is as effective as 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™ for auscultation of simulated heart sounds, and whether Stethee® could be recommended for use in clinical practice based on a non-inferior comparison with 3M™ Littmann® Classic III™.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 18, 2019
February 1, 2019
9 months
November 13, 2017
February 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correctly identified manikin-simulated heart sounds
The proportion of correctly identified heart sounds between groups will be compared. The test consist of 10 cardiac conditions (represented by 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds). Subjects (medical doctors) are required to auscultate each heart sound and write the complete answer on the answer sheet. The 'all-or-nothing' marking scheme is used, i.e. answers must exactly match the marking scheme.
Measured immediately after the test
Secondary Outcomes (3)
User preference for the two stethoscopes
Measured immediately after the test
Difference in the performance between subgroup of doctors from different clinical settings
Measured immediately after the test
Comparison of the performance of the two stethoscopes in identifying heart sounds of different levels of difficulty
Measured immediately after the test
Study Arms (2)
Stethee (new stethoscope)
EXPERIMENTALTest 1: Use Stethee® to auscultate and identify a set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds. Test 2: After a 10-minute break, use 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM to auscultate and identify the same set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds but played in a different sequence to Test 1.
Littmann (conventional stethoscope)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTest 1: Use 3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM to auscultate and identify a set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds. Test 2: After a 10-minute break, use Stethee® to auscultate and identify the same set of 10 manikin-simulated heart sounds but played in a different sequence to Test 1.
Interventions
Stethee® is a new wireless digital stethoscope.
3MTM Littmann® Classic IIITM is the conventional stethoscope.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-specialist medical doctors with up to 6 years of working experience post-house officer training
- Non-specialist medical doctors currently working in the Medical, Paediatric, Anaesthesiology, and Emergency departments of specialist hospitals
You may not qualify if:
- \. Non-specialist medical doctors who have worked in the Cardiology department for more than 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Clinical Research Centre, Malaysialead
- M3DICINE Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital
Ipoh, Perak, 30450, Malaysia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amanda Wei Yin Lim, Pharmacy
Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amar Singh HSS, Paediatrics
Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Pharmacist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2017
First Posted
November 17, 2017
Study Start
April 26, 2018
Primary Completion
February 1, 2019
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share