NCT03342989

Brief Summary

In this proposal, we will examine processing speed training (PST) as a potential intervention to reduce the risk of developing long-term cognitive impairment after a delirium episode.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 17, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 13, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 16, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

November 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

deliriumspeed of processingcognitive decline

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • General Cognitive Performance Battery

    Composite Neuropsychological Test Battery

    2 Month Follow-up

  • General Cognitive Performance Battery

    Composite Neuropsychological Test Battery

    24 Month Follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

    2 Month Follow-up

  • Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

    24 Month Follow-up

  • Incident Dementia

    2 Month Follow-Up

  • Incident Dementia

    24 Month Follow-Up

Study Arms (2)

Speed of Processing Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Training involves detection, localization, and discrimination of briefly displayed stimuli (17-500 milliseconds) using tasks with varying demands on visual attention. Cognitive processing speed is defined as response accuracy at a given display duration, regardless of motor speed. Training involves detection, localization, and discrimination of briefly displayed stimuli (17-500 milliseconds) using tasks with varying demands on visual attention. Speed of processing is defined as response accuracy at a given display duration, regardless of motor speed. Training consists of 10 lab-based sessions over 5 weeks, followed by home-based practice on a tablet computer for 24 months with supportive home visits.

Behavioral: Speed of Processing Training

Internet-Based Contact Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Training involves mentally stimulating activity and consists of three levels: (1) using a computer (e.g., mouse training, pull-down menus, selecting options), (2) internet search engine training, and (3) search engine proficiency tasks. Training consists of 10 lab-based sessions over 5 weeks, followed by home-based practice on a tablet computer for 24 months with supportive home visits.

Behavioral: Internet-Based Contact Control

Interventions

This intervention is based on computer-administered tasks that are used to evaluate Useful Field of View test, which measures discrimination between visually presented stimuli in the presence of distractors

Speed of Processing Training

This intervention provides social contact and mentally stimulating activities that do not target speed of processing

Internet-Based Contact Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English speaking (English need not be first language);
  • admission to the inpatient medical wards at University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital;
  • positive screen for delirium, defined as a score ≥ 1 on the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, during hospitalization;
  • presence of delirium, defined using the Confusion Assessment Method, during hospitalization;
  • informant-rated AD8 score ≤ 6;
  • living within 40 miles of the Birmingham, Alabama metro area.

You may not qualify if:

  • active delirium at the time of baseline assessment after hospital discharge, defined using the Confusion Assessment Method;
  • hospitalization in the previous 3 months prior to the index hospitalization;
  • terminal condition with life expectancy \< 6 months;
  • inability to perform cognitive tests due to poor vision or hearing at baseline assessment;
  • history of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder;
  • alcohol withdrawal delirium during hospitalization, history of alcohol abuse, or history of alcohol withdrawal in the previous 6 months;
  • unable to provide informed consent at baseline visit (proxy consent may be used for in-hospital assessments).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Wadley VG, Benz RL, Ball KK, Roenker DL, Edwards JD, Vance DE. Development and evaluation of home-based speed-of-processing training for older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jun;87(6):757-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.027.

    PMID: 16731209BACKGROUND
  • Inouye SK, Marcantonio ER, Kosar CM, Tommet D, Schmitt EM, Travison TG, Saczynski JS, Ngo LH, Alsop DC, Jones RN. The short-term and long-term relationship between delirium and cognitive trajectory in older surgical patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Jul;12(7):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

    PMID: 27103261BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DeliriumDementiaCognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ConfusionNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesCognition Disorders

Study Officials

  • Richard E Kennedy, MD, PhD

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2017

First Posted

November 17, 2017

Study Start

August 13, 2018

Primary Completion

May 31, 2020

Study Completion

May 31, 2020

Last Updated

November 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Given the current lack of treatments for the cognitive and functional complications of delirium, we anticipate that this data will be of great interest to other researchers, both for exploring additional hypotheses that were not part of this proposal and as pilot data for designing future trials of other interventions in delirium. Data to be shared will consist of demographic and medical data, cognitive assessment data, and data on daily functioning collected as part of the study. Data will be stripped of personal identifiers prior to distribution. Data will be made available by request through a secure file-sharing service hosted by the University of Alabama at Birmingham (e.g., UAB Box). Interview data will be made available in file formats for a variety of statistical software (e.g., SPSS, SAS, R). All investigators will provide instructions on how to access the data in any publications and presentations utilizing data from this proposal.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Access to the data by other investigators, and dissemination of information on how to access the data, will begin as soon as possible but no later than within one year of the completion of the funded project period for the parent award or upon acceptance of the data for publication, whichever is earlier.
Access Criteria
Data sets will be distributed to researchers at other institutions after approval by the study investigators. Researchers will be required to submit a data use agreement and a brief research proposal outlining the goals of the research and the specific data elements requested. All requests will also require IRB approval (or documentation of exemption from IRB review) by the researcher's institution prior to release as well as the UAB IRB.

Locations