An RCT of a Smartphone-based TID Programme
A Smartphone Messaging Programme for Tobacco Industry Denormalisation - a Randomised Controlled Trial
A Smartphone Messaging Programme for Tobacco Industry Denormalisation - a Randomised Controlled Trial
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
163
1 country
1
Study Start
March 22, 2018
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 29, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 29, 2018
Actual (reported)The study aims to test the effect a smartphone-based intervention on primary school students and their parents' attitudes towards tobacco industry and their tobacco-related communications.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 29, 2018
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
November 8, 2017
Actual (reported)November 17, 2017
Actual (reported)March 22, 2018
Actual (reported)June 29, 2018
Actual (reported)June 29, 2018
Actual (reported)TID beliefs in parents
Parents will report their opinions towards 4 sentences: 1) Tobacco companies are a respectable industry; 2) the tobacco industry does everything it can to get young people to smoke; 2) the tobacco industry use many tactics to resist tobacco control regulations; 4) the tobacco industry deceived the public for financial interests. All the 4 questions have 5 options from definitely yes to definitely no. The options will be recoded into 0-4 or 4-0, as appropriate, with higher scores indicating more negative attitudes towards the industry. A sum of scores from the 4 questions will be deemed a measurement of TID beliefs.
1 month
TID beliefs in children
Students will report their opinions towards 4 sentences: 1) Tobacco companies are a respectable industry; 2) the tobacco industry does everything it can to get young people to smoke; 2) the tobacco industry use many tactics to resist tobacco control regulations; 4) the tobacco industry deceived the public for financial interests. All the 4 questions have 5 options from definitely yes to definitely no. The options will be recoded into 0-4 or 4-0, as appropriate, with higher scores indicating more negative attitudes towards the industry. A sum of scores from the 4 questions will be deemed a measurement of TID beliefs.
1 month
Tobacco related communication reported by parents
1 month
Sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) related communication reported by parents
1 month
Tobacco related communication reported by children
1 month
SSB related communication reported by children
1 month
Intention to smoke in children
1 month
Messages will be sent 1-2 times per week containing information that aims to denormalise the tobacco industry.
Messages will be sent 1-2 times per week containing information on the adverse health effects of sugar sweetened beverages.
For the TID arm, the messages' contents include the tobacco industry's (TI's) anti-smoking campaigns that made smoking more grown-up and more appealing to youth; the TI's role in smoking in movies; etc. For the sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) arm, the messages' contents include the disease conditions linked to SSBs, and the interference of sugar industry in scientific research.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Local primary schools
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Sai Yin Ho, PhD
The University of Hong Kong
163 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
November 8, 2017
First Posted
November 17, 2017
Study Start
March 22, 2018
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
June 29, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 29, 2018
Actual (reported)Last Updated
September 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: